Dornier 335
Well-known member
- Joined
- Aug 3, 2005
- Posts
- 1,089
The F/A's at AA are angels when compared with their gate agents....
From a personal experience I must say this is true. There's a reason they are being nicknamed "Eva" ...
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
The F/A's at AA are angels when compared with their gate agents....
Vote with your feet.
...another ditto
Again...WHO CARES what the job "used" to be? Again, WHY do YOU care? Why do pilots INSIST on pointing that out all the freakin' time? What's your point? It doesn't matter what it USED to be...it's what it is NOW.The real problem is the flight attendant position was never meant to be a full time career, just a temporary job like being a waiter. Unfortunately the politically correct types demanded an end to weight/age/fitness/etc. requirements and so forth, and now I wish all those soft boiled legal brains the bad service they deserve on which ever particular flight they happen to embark.
Irrelevant. $ for $ you get more work out of your FA staffing than you do your pilot staffing. Careful: I'm not quantifying value of the job; that's usually what pilots do to belittle FA's. The jobs are vastly different...I get that. I'm saying you get more workers for the money...there's a difference.Do the multiplication....
Is your GED working for you?It's a job that can be done with a GED and a weeks worth of training. They are basically qualified to be a "Merry Maid" outside of AA.
I've got to hand it too them.
Just dem facts'
why do they need GEDs? That seems like overkill for a job that involves opening cans of soda. . .
Agreed.Notice also that my problem is with certain members of that group who provide documented crappy service, yet have been paid near the top of the industry for over a decade.
But apparently not career FA's. Qualifications aren't skills.Note that I also stated pure fact regarding skills and qualifications and that I have total respect for Merry Maids and many other entry level jobs,
1. It was paid ticket
2. I re-affirm that attitude towards paying customers is a poor way to represent the company
3. They were major b**tches
If there are two levels of service available, why don't you pony up some money for the higher service level? Or why don't you charter a jet? IMHO, first class on my airline is a darn fine product. And we do treat those customers better. They pay more.
I highly doubt that. Most of us corporate guys understand that things happen, and we do know that most US airline employees are treated like crap. Honestly, I feel pretty bad for a lot of them and go out of my way to thank everybody on the way out (both cabin crew and pilots). More importantly, the number of us corp/frac pilots traveling on revenue tickets is nothing but a small fraction of the tickets sold. There's absolutely NO WAY we could be the ones doing most of the complaining. I'd say it's most likely the Orbitz crowd that is your biggest critic... They want champagne service for peanuts.The harshest critique we get in the airline business is from corporate guys riding around on tickets somebody else is paying for.
Nobody here has suggested that have they?Fill out a comment card, will ya? At my airline [CAL] that card has to be answered by a VP if you're a Onepass member. We're really trying to clean house on our worst customer service FA offenders. (most are pretty good) But seems that it's more fun to whine on FI. Maybe you're more interested in going back to the days when customers were allowed to beat the crap out of airline employees? Frankly, that seems to be what customers miss the most these days. Sad.
Ah, yes that would certainly be a brilliant move. Stop selling tickets to some of your best paying customers - brilliant! When we travel, it's usually at the last minute and we pay whatever we gotta pay to be there. Trust me, your airline would MUCH rather have me than an Orbitz traveler.What i'd like to see happen? (not that you've asked) I'd like to see airlines stop selling tickets to ALL fractional and corporate pilots. I'd like to see how cost effective those things are when you can't use an airline ticket to get the help moved around to fly it. It's not like the customers in the back of those things are going to stop traveling. I'd like to re-acquaint them with the airline.
The airlines learned long ago that the exact opposite is true.
If there are two levels of service available, why don't you pony up some money for the higher service level? Or why don't you charter a jet? IMHO, first class on my airline is a darn fine product. And we do treat those customers better. They pay more.
The harshest critique we get in the airline business is from corporate guys riding around on tickets somebody else is paying for.
Fill out a comment card, will ya? At my airline [CAL] that card has to be answered by a VP if you're a Onepass member. We're really trying to clean house on our worst customer service FA offenders. (most are pretty good) But seems that it's more fun to whine on FI. Maybe you're more interested in going back to the days when customers were allowed to beat the crap out of airline employees? Frankly, that seems to be what customers miss the most these days. Sad.
What i'd like to see happen? (not that you've asked) I'd like to see airlines stop selling tickets to ALL fractional and corporate pilots. I'd like to see how cost effective those things are when you can't use an airline ticket to get the help moved around to fly it. It's not like the customers in the back of those things are going to stop traveling. I'd like to re-acquaint them with the airline.
Just flew AA a few days ago, MD-80, DFW to MMMX. Superb, grade-A, b**tches as FA's on that flight.
WTF is wrong with your FA program. The pax are the reason the company is afloat, and the FA is the primary face of the company.