Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Friendliest aviation Ccmmunity on the web
  • Modern site for PC's, Phones, Tablets - no 3rd party apps required
  • Ask questions, help others, promote aviation
  • Share the passion for aviation
  • Invite everyone to Flightinfo.com and let's have fun

Good NJA Flight

Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Modern secure site, no 3rd party apps required
  • Invite your friends
  • Share the passion of aviation
  • Friendliest aviation community on the web

NJAowner

Well-known member
Joined
May 22, 2003
Posts
748
Since my last "feedback" to this board was not positive, I am glad to say I had a few flights this past week. I would say the crews' attitudes were back to normal -- very pleasant, courteous, etc. The only "attitude" was a positive one centered around good service. I had a good discussion with one SIC about the current negotiations etc. -- the conversation was initiated by me and he asked alot of questions since I feel he usually doesn't get to ask certain questions to owners. On another flight, the crew meals were usually light and we shared some of out extra food which was greatly appreciated. Most important of all -- ithey were safe and uneventful flights. Thanks.

Fly safe.

P.S. - I have recently spoken with another owner I know who is seriously considering switching to CS. Not pilot issues but multiple Owner Services issues. He has a different team than me and I have not had any OS issues in a while.
 
Last edited:
Want a cookie?

The only "attitude" was a positive one centered around good service

I haven't read a statement as arrogant and condescending as that one in a long time. You should be thankfull the pilots get you there safely and on time given the current climate NJA is placing them in. Made any false accusations about pilots sleeping in the cockpit lately?

The pilots have been making up for owner services mistakes for years and now that they have stoped covering owner services butt owners are blaming the poor service on the pilots.

Whats next, eh?
 
Fracster said:
You should be thankfull the pilots get you there safely and on time given the current climate NJA is placing them in.

What are you talking about? I apologize for being so ignorant about the "unsafe" environment NetJets is placing you in. Can you give us some instances where NetJets has purposely placed you in an unsafe situation? I'm sure that there is the occasional paperwork mistake or something of that nature, but you make it sound like you pilots are being targeted or something.

Or would your statement be called "reverse flamebait"?
 
Fracster said:
Want a cookie?



I haven't read a statement as arrogant and condescending as that one in a long time. You should be thankfull the pilots get you there safely and on time given the current climate NJA is placing them in. Made any false accusations about pilots sleeping in the cockpit lately?

The pilots have been making up for owner services mistakes for years and now that they have stoped covering owner services butt owners are blaming the poor service on the pilots.

Whats next, eh?

I think you misread what he meant.
 
Some guy said:
Can you give us some instances where NetJets has purposely placed you in an unsafe situation?
Recently, a crew had electrical smoke coming from the yoke. They were able to isolate the source of the electrical fire, pull the appropriate circuit breaker and land without event. Under the company's new Maintenance Carry Over program (the mechanic's ability to MEL items that are not covered by the MEL), a maintenance tech collared the circuit breaker and pronounced the plane safe for 3 additional legs. To me, that sounds unsafe. Why wouldn't you want to inspect the control column area and see exactly what was damaged? Any other associated wires damaged? I guess not, as long as it's more important to "keep 'em flying" instead of "keep 'em from burning". Care to defend that?
 
Majik said:
Recently, a crew had electrical smoke coming from the yoke. They were able to isolate the source of the electrical fire, pull the appropriate circuit breaker and land without event. Under the company's new Maintenance Carry Over program (the mechanic's ability to MEL items that are not covered by the MEL), a maintenance tech collared the circuit breaker and pronounced the plane safe for 3 additional legs. To me, that sounds unsafe. Why wouldn't you want to inspect the control column area and see exactly what was damaged? Any other associated wires damaged? I guess not, as long as it's more important to "keep 'em flying" instead of "keep 'em from burning". Care to defend that?

Excellent question. I had not heard of this incident in particular. My job requires me to be very closely involved with the maintenance side of things with NetJets. I cannot speak for this incident, but if this were to happen on my shift, I would have had the tech absolutely determine where and what the problem was and ensured that it was isolated to one spot / system. Yes an inspection of the affected area would be required and if found to be safe, the acft would be flown via ferry permit (no pax) one flight to a service center. (I'm not sure I would have used the MCO myself) Are you sure the technician didn't inspect the wires / etc inside the yoke? I'll bet that there is a little more to the story. I don't believe, nor have I seen, anyone in the dept I work in knowingly allow any pilot to take an unsafe aircraft. You know you are always welcomed to call us and question anything that doesn't seem right. It is our built in system of checks & balances. As far as (maintenance) safety goes we all need to be on the same side.

As of now, our DOM must approve of all MCO items. By time it gets to him, 2 or 3 people have already agreed that we can MCO the item in question.
 
Oh yeah, I work for the same company that provides you excellent service, who gets you to your destination safely and who are having horrible labor/management relations. I am a member of above pilot group who you can so easily b!tch about because some pilot or two didn't greet you with a smile and kiss your a$$.
I don't give a fook how much money you have or who you are but don't complain about my pilot group. If you don't like it, LEAVE!

We do an excellent job. We are on time, efficient and above all safe. We make sure YOUR catering is on board. We make sure YOUR newspapers, magazines and personal items are on board. We make sure YOUR car/limo/rental is ready for you and we don't call the company and complain when you show up pissed off because you broke a nail or had a lousy day on the golf course.
 
Thank you acaTerry and Publishers. Plus I do not think that FRACster is a NJA pilot.

If he is he's an embarrassment to our company.

Unfortunately, he may very well be who he says he is. I've been with the company longer than most, and until recently I didn't think we had people like that.

Many of us know who really pays the bills and despite our differences appreciate the work and your patronage.

One can only hope he will heed his own advice....

If you don't like it, LEAVE!
 
Fracster said:
Oh yeah, I work for the same company that provides you excellent service, who gets you to your destination safely and who are having horrible labor/management relations. I am a member of above pilot group who you can so easily b!tch about because some pilot or two didn't greet you with a smile and kiss your a$$.
I don't give a fook how much money you have or who you are but don't complain about my pilot group. If you don't like it, LEAVE!

We do an excellent job. We are on time, efficient and above all safe. We make sure YOUR catering is on board. We make sure YOUR newspapers, magazines and personal items are on board. We make sure YOUR car/limo/rental is ready for you and we don't call the company and complain when you show up pissed off because you broke a nail or had a lousy day on the golf course.

You, my friend, are a total dork. You are an embarrassment to all corporate pilots. Regardless of whatever struggle you are going through, you are (or a supposed to be) a professional. Act like one. This ‘guy’ you are insulting and have so much disdain for, is the bread and butter of our industry. How would you like it if your surgeon called you a little baby because you wanted all these silly scared questions asked before he cut into your body. Or if your shrink called you whiner for having so many problems. Our job is to make these peoples lives happier and more convenient. If it were just about safety, they could go fly on American or United. Get a clue.



Again, if you have so much animosity towards ‘rich’ people, then get another job. Read the headlines: private jets are paid for by rich people!



Ace
 
Coming up to this July 4th, Independence Day, we are thankful for all who have given to defend freedom and this nation.


P.S. to Some Dude ---- that is Dan Ackroyd in the avatar.
 
Last edited:
Fracster said:
Oh yeah, I work for the same company that provides you excellent service, who gets you to your destination safely and who are having horrible labor/management relations. I am a member of above pilot group who you can so easily b!tch about because some pilot or two didn't greet you with a smile and kiss your a$$.
I don't give a fook how much money you have or who you are but don't complain about my pilot group. If you don't like it, LEAVE!

We do an excellent job. We are on time, efficient and above all safe. We make sure YOUR catering is on board. We make sure YOUR newspapers, magazines and personal items are on board. We make sure YOUR car/limo/rental is ready for you and we don't call the company and complain when you show up pissed off because you broke a nail or had a lousy day on the golf course.

I see where you get your ire at the current labor conditions, pay, etc. But lashing out at NJAowner, or ANY owner, is not the answer. The gripes he brought up last week (which are seperate from this thread) were legitimate gripes that would make anyone unsatisfied. I have followed his posts for quite some time and have not found anything to get mad about.
I'm sure he is pleased with the pilots as a whole and feels safe with us, after all he hasn't headed over to FLOPS.
In fact, when I see a profile filled out with things like "enough" and "seberal", it looks more like a fake pilot than one who is actually what he claims to be.
 
Last edited:
You see he and the other owners own aircraft so they can depart when they want to depart, not when some airline planning department have figured out they can get 135 people together,

they want to have the catering they like on board, not the fresh peanuts offered.

Yes they want the same level of first class equipment and piloting that a carrier has. They do want to be able to drive to the aircraft and not have to stand in some TSA line for an hour. No they do not want to be searched and screened like some box going through a machine.

To do that, they pay money. Money erned and spent on aircraft and services. It is that money that pays for the design and construction of that piece of metal your flying through the sky. It pays for the fuel to keep it in the air. When you pull into the FBO and they come running out to help you and see what you need, they are really there for him not you.

That money he spends is why you have someone on the other end of that radio to assist you along on your flight without running into others. That money pays for your shoes and those shiinny bars on your shoulder.

He is one of your owners because he had faith in your company. Without him, your company, your job does not exist at all.

Oh you do not need him, heh no problem. I jsut cannot wait to see your lagacy when you die. That life accomplishment because so far you are just taking up space.
 

Latest resources

Back
Top Bottom