Please indicate where I came off as patronizing/stupid. If I offended you guys in any way asking what seems to me to be a fair question, please accept my apologies. But it really comes as a surprise to me that the corporate piloting profession can be so splintered so as to allow a radically different pay scale between a global jet (BBJ) and a regional turboprop (King Air) whereby the King Air pilot makes almost triple what the BBJ pilot makes. It seems really wrong to me. Wouldn't the BBJ pilot making $50k have ANYTHING to say about that? And why would he take that job when he could be making triple flying a King Air? Sorry, but the logic just doesn't add up for me. Again, apologies if I came off the wrong way but I'm really curious as to how this can happen in your field. Thanks for any input. Your "lowly" airline compadre,
73
It seems really wrong to me. Wouldn't the BBJ pilot making $50k have ANYTHING to say about that?
Not really, all he can say is, "I will not work for that little." Then the owner says, 'Fine, I'll hire someone who will."
And trust me on this, there is always a pilot out there that will. Always has been, always will be. There are pilots out there that will fly for free, I know, because when I was a Chief Pilot/Flight Deparpment Mannager for various companies I had some apply for jobs, not only willing to fly for free, but I had two pilots actually inform me that they would pay for their own type ratings. Needless to say I threw all of them out of my office.
And why would he take that job when he could be making triple flying a King Air?
That's easy, the ego of flying a BBJ. We pilots do have rather large egos you know, sometimes it works for us, sometimes against us.
Now, on a personal note, I left the left seat of a 727 to go fly a Sabre 65, for about twice the money. It was a Government 727 at that.
I never looked back.