Superpilot92
LONGCALL KING
- Joined
- Nov 7, 2004
- Posts
- 3,719
Just curious, how do you know we have 300 to 400 guys on the fence about leaving?
HR rumor TIFWIW
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Just curious, how do you know we have 300 to 400 guys on the fence about leaving?
Again, if there are fences and they only park the DC9s, (and the DC9s are fenced), only NWA pilots or new hires after the DCC would be sent to compass.
Bye Bye--General Lee
Wild Guess Alert
With the rush to get the SLI done and the timing of the fleet changes and the fact that an aircraft change would be an entire training cycle....
IF it is true that Delta is delaying their hiring THEN my guess is that there will be displaced NWA pilots on a Delta advanced entitlement bid within the next five months.
Makes more sense than hiring to furlough. Explains the urgency and I think would be approved by the FAA, even with separate certificates. Requires an airplane change & full training cycle.
My theory could be shot down (or confirmed) fast by someone with intricate knowledge of the NWA transition agreement. Are the bidding requirements a minimum limit, or a maximum limit? Can they do bids faster than the transition agreement? Can management be in compliance faster than agreed? I bet the answer is yes.
This seems like something that is a "nice to have" that could go either way. ACL65's comment went over my head, but I think one reason for the cancellation of the displacement was that things are moving too fast to train up pilots when the bids are going to be overcome by events.
Occam, FDJ2 (where's he been) and others - am I nuts?
And what would you do with the DC9 Captains - furlough 12+ year NWA pilots while yesterday's DAL new hire is safe. What about a 25 year 747-200 Captain? Don't think so, and a reason I'm guessing there will be no fences.
Even though it's inconceivable to you right now, it could cut the other way as well - the MD-88's are only marginally more efficient than the DC-9-50. IF for some reason 88's were parked and DC9's were not would you be in favor of furloughing those pilots out of seniority, or rather have them be able to bump into a more junior position, even it's a DC9?
GL,
Again not talking fences. With a single list your seniority number determines what you fly not your pre-merger aircraft. You may well have 737 F/O's junior to DC9 F/O's. If the DC9 gets parked the senior pilots go where their seniority will let them.
Sans a SOC does not mean that a former NWA DC9 pilot could not displace into a 737 F/O ahead of a SOC. All us former NWA'ers will have to go through a DAL indoc at some point, and full training would simply be indoc + aircraft.
I know you desperately want former NWA pilots to take all the hits, but bottom line is seniority will determine where a pilot goes.
And what would you do with the DC9 Captains - furlough 12+ year NWA pilots while yesterday's DAL new hire is safe. What about a 25 year 747-200 Captain? Don't think so, and a reason I'm guessing there will be no fences.
If we start furloughing out of seniority we open a Pandora's box of problems that would make USair look tame. Even though it's inconceivable to you right now, it could cut the other way as well - the MD-88's are only marginally more efficient than the DC-9-50. IF for some reason 88's were parked and DC9's were not would you be in favor of furloughing those pilots out of seniority, or rather have them be able to bump into a more junior position, even it's a DC9?
This also supports the no hiring in the fall rumor.....
do we need to argue this bs anymore? the sli and integration will happen regardless.