Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Friendliest aviation Ccmmunity on the web
  • Modern site for PC's, Phones, Tablets - no 3rd party apps required
  • Ask questions, help others, promote aviation
  • Share the passion for aviation
  • Invite everyone to Flightinfo.com and let's have fun

FUD at Flight Options

Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Modern secure site, no 3rd party apps required
  • Invite your friends
  • Share the passion of aviation
  • Friendliest aviation community on the web
So how do you ban B19 for not making any sense? If he made a little sense fine, but he dosen't.

Because you are not fully informed, I understand why it doesn't make sense to you. There are many that have been screwed over by unions that what I say makes perfect sense.

You would simply prefer the union to speak for you and accept the terms of the MEC rather than take responsibility for your own career.


That makes sense to me.
 
Because you are not fully informed, I understand why it doesn't make sense to you. There are many that have been screwed over by unions that what I say makes perfect sense.

You would simply prefer the union to speak for you and accept the terms of the MEC rather than take responsibility for your own career.


That makes sense to me.

Dear BOB TYLER, Quit patting yourself on the back for your vacuous and mindless anti union drivel. You are under the delusion that your points have merit. Every one of them has be debunked and many in several different ways. Yet, you keep repeating them in every Groundhog Day after Groundhog Day post. You're stupid enough to congratulate yourself as some anti union crusader but, your arguments are just lame. You're the bane of the industry......scab.
 
Last edited:
Because you are not fully informed, I understand why it doesn't make sense to you. There are many that have been screwed over by unions that what I say makes perfect sense.

You would simply prefer the union to speak for you and accept the terms of the MEC rather than take responsibility for your own career.


That makes sense to me.

Wabi is not the only one who is not fully informed.

I have asked you repeatedly to do your homework on fracs, 1108, and especially NJA. Your inaccuracies make you look like a fool, and annoy everyone else.

Missing the start date of the fractional industry by 41 years is an example.
 
What a moron!

So, which statement is the lie? This...
Until February of 2005, fractional ownership was a free-for all. The cost of implementing 91K regulations for a Part 91 operator is staggering.
HaaaHaaaa! Or this...
Fractionals were "born" then, not before then. If it was a great business model, there would be more than 18 companies that hold management specifications.

________________________________________________

Were fractionals a "free for all" before they were "born"? You're funny!

My take is that all your posts are lies. You are a joke.
 
My thoughts.....

B19, you are either refusing to, or are completely incapable of understanding a few basic things here. For example, take these quotes from your posts....
Furthermore, unions have redirected my career twice, and I will never believe that unions will help the industry or are needed in today's day and age.
OK, fine. How many pilots careers have been "redirected" because of bad management? Based on what I have seen and heard while working in this industry, a whole lot more than those who have been negatively affected by unions. Does this mean that all management is bad? Of course it doesn't. Just because you had bad experiences with unions doesn't mean they are all bad or are not needed.

Two thirds of the FLOPS pilots asked for a union and they are living with the result.
Yes, we are living with the "result". However, it is not the union (ie. the pilots) who are creating this "result". It is our management who is doing everything they can to make this process long and miserable. We are just rolling with it because that's all we can do, for now.

It's proof positive that a union isn't needed to make a good living and feel secure in your job.
I haven't talked to anyone here who thinks that unions are always needed. Options/RTA has not always needed a union. We certainly need one now. I'm glad that your company doesn't need one. Well-managed companies generally do not.

However, this company is not well-managed. Personally, I understand exactly what MS and Co. have been doing here. There are so many better and proven ways to reach the same result. Until recently, I have never seen such Mickey Mouse BS actions and practices come from a group of so called management professionals. I have witnessed first hand their intimidation tactics. I have personally heard (from their mouths) completely illogical and misleading practices, designed that way for only one logical reason. The examples go on.

I will not go into further detail because I don't want to be identified. If identified, I will most certainly be brought to CGF to talk about my "attitude" and probably be dismissed just for this one post. Hogwash, you say? Unfortunately, it is not. This is an example of what they have been doing.
 
Wabi is not the only one who is not fully informed.

I have asked you repeatedly to do your homework on fracs, 1108, and especially NJA. Your inaccuracies make you look like a fool, and annoy everyone else.

Missing the start date of the fractional industry by 41 years is an example.

My apologies to Wabi. My intent was not to say that he is ill informed, just as a transition to B19's lack of knowledge of the current situation.

Cheers brother.:beer:
 
No more debate with B19. He obviously is of the delusional camp that if you repeat lies and half truths enough times they become true.

Well, they don't.

FLOPS now has a union because all other avenues have been tried and led to dead ends. Talking with, discussing, and asking management for improvements at FLOPS has obviously failed. It seems to be working relatively well at Flex, and thus far no union there. But that just isn't the case at FLOPS.

B19 says the union isn't needed. His best advice for these pilots is to just suck it up and take it since you accepted employment there. Oh, and keep talking things over with management. After all, it's worked really well so far (for management!). Don't worry, one day they MAY throw you a bone. But a union certainly isn't needed.:rolleyes:

B19 continues to try to make it sound like unions ruin companies. He continually fails to discuss whether these companies were doing well before the unions supposedly 'killed' them or if, as is the case in pretty much every example, the company was teetering on the brink of financial ruin anyway.

How many companies do we all know about and see every day, that when times were tough, whether union or non-union, wages and benefits were slashed to the bone, and the company still went under anyway.

B19 likes to hold up United and American as prime examples of how unions can ask for too much and ruin a company. He fails to mention that the union contracts at those companies didn't cause the problems, the economy and bad management did. The economy slowed down. The average airline pax couldn't afford to fly so much. The airline's own overscheduling at hub airports created massive delays. Refusal to keep pax in the loop, or even provide basic decent service created much ill will. Cutting back on amenities and services further incited pax backlash. Competition from LCC's (some of whom still have highly paid pilots) cut into the money further. Soaring fuel costs. Costly govn't regs that had to be implemented. And so on and so forth.

But according to B19, none of these factors had anything to do with United's and American's downfall. It was the unions. Riiiiight (in my best Dr. Evil voice).

And he STILL, after numerous posts about it, hasn't commented on upper management walking away with huge sums of money and bonuses while the unions are expected to take concessions. His take: management's contracts should be honored, the unions should give it up.

From now on, when B19 holds a company up as an example of how a union destroyed it, do a little research and see what condition the company was in before the union killed it. I think you'll find he's kind of glossing over the most important parts.

No more debating with someone with his, ahem, 'background', as has been revealed on these boards.

Good luck FLOPS guys and gals! It really IS a tough fight, but few things worthwhile in life aren't gotten without some kind of fight.
 
It is tempting to think that ignoring him would shut him up...but I don't think it will. He is directed by Fud and Harrassment to post his sludge for any fence sitters who may use a forum like this looking for the truth that mgmt so desperately seeks to hide. He will continue to post and find ANYONE to argue with in his vain attempt to prove the unprovable, that unionization is "bad" and hurts careers....when unions come about because corrupt managers like HIM, are what ruin the careers and necessitate the existence of unions so good honest employees can band together and demand what is right in terms of work rules, safety, compensation packages and the like.

In fact, his presence on here, and the constant refuting of his spew probably help us more than anything, even though it is irritating to have to even look at it.
 
You're right brother. My "solidarity on a message board" comment was made tongue in cheek.

But let's not get side tracked. The point is a moderator (who would know) has confirmed he crossed a picket line. That makes him filth.

One effective course of action might be to consistently refer to him in the third person. That will be madding for him. Refuted and disputed never acknowledged. Kind of like picking up a piece of dog s**t with a hankie and tossing it in the rubbish.
 
Last edited:

Latest resources

Back
Top