Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I also predict that Frontier will serve cookies within a year.
So if I read between the lines of your post, the rumors about Republic FAs b!tching about the crushing burden of serving cookies are indeed true. Midwest has impressive brand loyalty, despite what Hoeky has put the customer through. In no small part because of the cookies. Brand loyalty is one of the very few things that can command a minor revenue premium in this environment. The easiest way to get trounced by the MKE invaders is to make oursleves indistinguishable from them. If competing on CASM alone, bringing a smaller airplane is like bringing a knife to a gunfight. The gimmick is necessary.
There will be a good number of "synergies" achieved through code share as time goes on. I feel confident that those Airbus flights will be flown by Frontier pilots in Frontier painted aircraft. The 190's will be operated by Republic certificate (only a part of the RAH conglomerate), with the first 12 aircraft, at least, being in Midwest colors, even if they are flying through Denver.
In the end, one brand will go away, but a lot of behind the scenes work needs to happen first. Also, by putting Midwest passengers on F9 Airbuses out of MKE, Midwest passengers will get to experience the Frontier product, which I think they will find to be an acceptable replacement to the Midwest product of the last 18 months. Once Midwest-loyal passengers are acclimated to and accepting of Frontier, the change over will begin and the Midwest brand will be shelved. I also predict that Frontier will serve cookies within a year.
As for point to point service in general, I think RAH overall has the aircraft that would make less hub-oriented routings more profitable. Southwest has proven that point to point is still viable, and RAH can practically access markets that may not offer good returns if a 737 was utilized.
I am a Republic Employee, and it saddens me, the YX staff with 20 to 25 years with the company, who know how the airline works are being let go, and replaced with people who have no idea how a airline runs or any factor to good customer service
Spoken like a true expert
He forgot to factor the 37$ hr max pay rate in his analysis, It's funny how those pucks are now so proud of that S@@@t hole they create.
Damn Southwest guys they could have taken that cancer out before it spread..
Yup. Single seniority list from Caravan through Airbus, with no outsourced flying. What an evil and cancerous concept. You may point to the pay (of an "expired" contract), but you overlook the successful killing of an alter-ego airline, and you overlook scope that keeps all flying in house and all pilots on one list, with no aircraft too small to be included. Personally, I would rather build my future upon a contract with great scope and work to improve pay than build my future on a contract with great pay and loose scope.
And before you call me a hypocrite because I fly scoped out airplanes, let me remind you that mainline pilots gave me this job, and I could not have interviewed at a major airline with the low hiring numbers and high turbine PIC requirements of the past 8 years.
I am willing to put in the work to improve this place. And I am glad that our scope gives me the security of knowing that my company can't replace or outsource my job. It amazes me how critical everyone is of RAH when we are one of the few airlines that has solid scope that has never been conceded.
Little Icarus those Jets got so Shiny that you got blind....
Yup. Single seniority list from Caravan through Airbus, with no outsourced flying. What an evil and cancerous concept. You may point to the pay (of an "expired" contract), but you overlook the successful killing of an alter-ego airline, and you overlook scope that keeps all flying in house and all pilots on one list, with no aircraft too small to be included. Personally, I would rather build my future upon a contract with great scope and work to improve pay than build my future on a contract with great pay and loose scope.
And before you call me a hypocrite because I fly scoped out airplanes, let me remind you that mainline pilots gave me this job, and I could not have interviewed at a major airline with the low hiring numbers and high turbine PIC requirements of the past 8 years.
I am willing to put in the work to improve this place. And I am glad that our scope gives me the security of knowing that my company can't replace or outsource my job. It amazes me how critical everyone is of RAH when we are one of the few airlines that has solid scope that has never been conceded.
Or is Frontier just doomed to being told that they cost too much and need to come down to the rest of the groups rates?
Let's see, Bedford has publicly stated his desire to raise the current F9 Airbus rates by about 3%, and wants to keep their contract in place for three more years. So I am going to have to say that, no, Frontier will not be told to step in line.
And I don't know if I would call it "exploiting loopholes" in scope. When Delta pilots say "you may fly x number of 76 seat airplanes", and RAH then gets 76 seat airplanes, it seems like a straight forward business deal to me. And while I personally am not in favor of the entire Midwest fiasco, you need to ask yourself if any fewer jobs would have been lost had Republic not gotten involved. Midwest management lost those 717's to Boeing. There would still be 0 jobs remaining within a year had republic or anyone else not stepped in.