Rez O. Lewshun
Save the Profession
- Joined
- Jan 19, 2004
- Posts
- 13,422
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I commute to DEN and live in LAS so this would be a dream come true. Course I'm at Lynx so I'm not holding my breathe...fingers crossed though.
Good luck with that! I bet all the lynx guys are licking their chops waiting on a Swa number!
With 4 years seniority at F9 I think I can live with getting stapled as long as we get WN longevity pay. After my last furlough I have never really worried about getting a captain bid anywhere and have resigned myself to being a professional gear monkey for the majority of my career. The hardest thing for me, and I believe many other F9 guys, is the fact that we will probably not be able to hold DEN as a base for quite awhile (I am also a Colorado native, FWIW). Seems pretty unfair to me that we will probably be commuting to OAK (or wherever is most junior at WN) when DEN is OUR OWN BASE. This will be the majority of our guys since F9 has a lower percentage of commuters than most other airlines. WN will not even have a DEN domicile until after this transaction, no matter which way it goes. Perhaps we can have some sort of protection to keep us in the base even though our seniorty won't support it. TWA guys were protected in STL after the AA deal. Im sure there are some WN DEN guys that are commuting now and licking their chops over driving to work. I hope they think about us when they see us hanging out by the gate sweating to get the jumpseat for the west coast or wherever....
PS, save your sick days Animals, you may need them!
Good luck with that! I bet all the lynx guys are licking their chops waiting on a Swa number!
I made $143,000 as a 4th year FO. I think swa will be a much better deal for you guys.
Just remember, we don't get paid by the hour, we get paid by the trip. I average about 115 to 120 trips per month.
Dick
ATA all over again.[/QUOTE said:I've got an idea: From now on when anyone wants to bring up the SWA/ATA deal and compare it to the SWA/F9 deal, they must get a note from their lawyer that confirms they have been briefed and understand that there are almost no similarities in the two scenerios. Good? Ok.
SWA pilots; Don't let the posers on this board (Instructor Dude, numerous RAH pilots) succeed in stirring the pot. The F9 pilots and the SWA pilots are cut from the same cloth and share common attitudes and atributes. Most importantly, there is generally a mutual respect for one another. This could be a good deal for both sides going foward if executed properly.
Frontier pilots; Be respectful and let the process play out. You bring a lot to the table including near international operations, a profitable airline operation, a loyal customer base, and a great corporate culture that will meld well with the SWA group. Don't sell yourselves short but at the same time don't be greedy.
At the end of the day most F9 pilots would prefer to stay independent with non-airline investment capital, but absent that, the SWA deal is certainly better for the pilot group than the RAH alternative in terms of their financial and long-term future.
I hope we can break the trend that has been ruining this profession by instead implementing a fair seniority integration in an amicable fashion.
I've got an idea: From now on when anyone wants to bring up the SWA/ATA deal and compare it to the SWA/F9 deal, they must get a note from their lawyer that confirms they have been briefed and understand that there are almost no similarities in the two scenerios.
I've got an idea: From now on when anyone wants to bring up the SWA/ATA deal and compare it to the SWA/F9 deal, they must get a note from their lawyer that confirms they have been briefed and understand that there are almost no similarities in the two scenerios. Good? Ok.