bobbysamd said:Once more, my friend, I thank you for your kind comments. Just as you are doing, sir, I am only expressing my $0.02 opinions.Here is a link to the crap.
Prove me wrong. How old were you when you were hired? And in what year? What was your level of experience? Did you have 135 experience? If you have read my posts carefully, you will have noted that I have said I do not believe there is age discrmination against over-40 pilots who started out young and got their chances later and/or who had previous 135, 121 or corporate experience. Just so you understand, I believe that age discrimination is practiced against later-life career changers without 135, 121 or corporate experience.
Having written all that, please, send me more insults.
Bobbysamd, Booby,
Phil Henry, or whatever your name is.
Let's just say I had the same qualifications, maybe even less than you had.
I had the same theories as you, when I too, was turned down from COEX when they were pay for training. I had to adapt, change my interview techniques.
I saw people PFT and I should have done it. Those folks are by far way ahead of the crowd. Heck one quarter of the folks at my current outfit paid for training. Oh yeah they were paid back from company, are they PFT rats?
Gees, we have drifted way off of this thread.
Booby,
aviation has changed structurally in the last two years.
If you wanna bash and insult people,
rant against the management of the legacy carriers.
They have essentially destroyed the future of both "PFT" and "non PFT" folks.
We the taxpayers, are gonna wind up funding BILLIONS in pensions.