Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Friendliest aviation Ccmmunity on the web
  • Modern site for PC's, Phones, Tablets - no 3rd party apps required
  • Ask questions, help others, promote aviation
  • Share the passion for aviation
  • Invite everyone to Flightinfo.com and let's have fun

Flying Struck Work???

Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Modern secure site, no 3rd party apps required
  • Invite your friends
  • Share the passion of aviation
  • Friendliest aviation community on the web

SF340Guy

Well-known member
Joined
Sep 26, 2004
Posts
148
What is ALPAs or Teamsters or any other unions definition of flying struck work?

If Republic begins flying for Midwest, and they have an established schedule, before the Midwest pilots walk out, if the Republic pilots continue to fly their schedules, but refuse changes to fly what Midwest has canceled is this "Struck Work"?

Please, i am not trying to start anything, I am just curious, because I have never been through this before.
 
When Comair went on strike, they defined struck work as any increase in frequency or guage along the struck city pairs. Although SkyWest began service SLC-DSM (Comair had a route CVG-DSM) it was not struck work. Neither would the flying you described in your scenario. On the other hand, I recall that Delta did increase frequency and/or guage on ATL-CVG with no repurcussions.
 
I've heard alot of people are fired up about the RAH / Midwest thing. Some points to remember:

1. Nobody asks the Pilots around here about business decisions.
2. None of the Pilots I've talked to think it's good for us EITHER!! - At what point are the tables turned on us??????
3. It is a violation of the CBA and the union is trying to expedite a grievance to stop this in it's tracks.
4. Everyone feels for the the Midwest guys - it sucks!!
5. What financial mess is Midwest in, that they would do this kind of deal?? Are they about to close the doors?
6. Our guys will probably cross an INFORMATIONAL PICKET , which does not make them Scabs. If they don't they will be fired and then good luck on getting your job back.
7. Even Airtran guys are asking our guys about this and chiming in - why aren't you lending Midwest money????

If you guys are really concerned about this topic (rightfully so), then have your MECs contact our union and talk it out with those guys.

P.S. I'm not a scab and will not cross a picket line (strike picket), as will all of the guys I've talked with. So if you are going to strike, make sure you get a committment from our union that they will back us up!!
 
What is ALPAs or Teamsters or any other unions definition of flying struck work?

I'll field this one. If anyone who is on ALPA's poop list even looks at an airplane airplane or merely sets foot in an airport, this is flying struck work. If you fly routes that used to belong to mainline, that is also flying struck work. If you vote down ALPA in a union drive and then draw a paycheck from that same company, this is also flying struck work (because those routes belong to ALPA, dangit!).

These people, who have the audacity and gall to challenge the ALPA uber alles mentality, should be blackballed and never allowed to fly again. All flying should be preserved for the "brotherhood."

Heil ALPA!!!

I hope this clears things up.

-Goose
 
Last edited:
I'll field this one. If anyone who is on ALPA's poop list even looks at an airplane airplane or merely sets foot in an airport, this is flying struck work. If you fly routes that used to belong to mainline, that is also flying struck work. If you vote down ALPA in a union drive and then draw a paycheck from that same company, this is also flying struck work (because those routes belong to ALPA, dangit!).

These people, who have the audacity and gall to challenge the ALPA uber alles mentality, should be blackballed and never allowed to fly again. All flying should be preserved for the "brotherhood."

Heil ALPA!!!

I hope this clears things up.

-Goose

Uh, what?
 
I'll field this one. If anyone who is on ALPA's poop list even looks at an airplane airplane or merely sets foot in an airport, this is flying struck work. If you fly routes that used to belong to mainline, that is also flying struck work. If you vote down ALPA in a union drive and then draw a paycheck from that same company, this is also flying struck work (because those routes belong to ALPA, dangit!).

These people, who have the audacity and gall to challenge the ALPA uber alles mentality, should be blackballed and never allowed to fly again. All flying should be preserved for the "brotherhood."

Heil ALPA!!!

I hope this clears things up.

-Goose


HEIL ALPA, ALL HEIL ALPA!!!!
 
Struck work is defined by the striking party, and is defined clearly at that time for the benefit of other pilot unions. If there is a strike at Midwest, they will let everyone know what they see as being struck work. Once that work is defined, we at RAH:

1) Will not fly it, as we are not scabs, and never have been scabs

2) Are, by CBA, compelled to not fly the struck work

3) Are no longer obligated to fly that work

4) Are protected from disciplinary actions by the company


Everyone seems so quick to judge, but very few of you have any actual experience with these matters. Strikes and struck work are legal actions and principles, and legality does not move an expeditious pace. we at RAH cannot refuse to fly for Midwest until they announce a strike, and then ALPA defines struck work for this particular strike. On another front, we at RAH are mounting our own legal challenge to this new deal in protection of our CBA. However, legal challenges are not made overnight, and run on the schedule of the courts.

So everyone settle the flip down, and let this play out. NO PILOT AT RAH has crossed a picket line, flown a Midwest plane against the advisement of our union, or acted in any way contrary to the CBA of RAH or Midwest.
 
Midwest can't strike, they have no legal standing to do so. Republic is not replacement work. Midwest is removing aircraft from service, not replacing aircraft in service.

I honestly don't understand how so few people can figure this out. Midwest is almost dead. Republic is just holding the gates until the Delta merger. TPG put up money. NW didn't. Enter Republic. They put up money for NW to fulfill its (Republic's) duty to shareholders, fly all of the planes. The bonus is that there will be some sort or reward after the merger. I really think this money puts Comair at a big risk.

Ultimately, this really isn't a union matter. All of you keep talking it up like it's the worst thing that ever happened.
 
Republic is not replacement work. Midwest is removing aircraft from service, not replacing aircraft in service.

Ehhhhh? Could you explain that? Are they taking out a 717 and replacing it with a 17?


I am lost, so what exactly is going on?
 

Latest resources

Back
Top Bottom