j41driver
Well-known member
- Joined
- Mar 31, 2002
- Posts
- 1,300
Struck work is defined by the striking party...
Exactly. No strike = no struck work.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Struck work is defined by the striking party...
the n# on the airplane did not change. this was a former mid atlantic (usair) airplane. there are several other MA/MD tail numbers and has nothing to do with the Midex N#s
So as long as it's not struck work you can just screw over another pilot group? By the way, I never used the word scab.
Shouldn't you HoJet pilots be saying "HEIL HULAS"?HEIL ALPA, ALL HEIL ALPA!!!!
I know you didn't, but others have. But really, what choice do Republic pilots have? Trust me, if Delta wasn't in the picture, they'd have turned out the lights at Midwest months ago. Republic isn't screwing anyone. TPG was able to jettison 16 717's. I think that's a much bigger screwjob. And if this is so groundbreaking, why aren't Frontier and Spirit doing the same thing?
Also, be very afraid after the entire MEC at Midwest get furloughed. Many of the top 100 are not very pro-union. I'd be more concerned about them screwing everyone.
Exactly. No strike = no struck work.
Republic is still furloughing. The Midwest deal has had zero impact on that. Why, you ask? The furloughs (forgot the final number, but in the 150 range) cover the 15 E135's being sold and the handful of CRJ's being returned as leases expire. We never furloughed a number that corresponded to the loss of the above mentioned aircraft AND the parked Frontier airplanes. RAH management has been planning around this Midwest deal for a while now... we the pilots never knew what was coming, but the seemingly small furlough number indicated that we needed more pilots than projected fleet size dictated.
Anyhow, I digress. You say that Republic pilots are rejoicing because the Midwest deal has helped avoid furloughs. That is wrong. You are wrong. Perhaps in coming to grips with your incorrect information, you will begin to hate a little less and desire to learn a little more.
You are correct. It's called an Alter-ego airline. The end result is the same.
I stand corrected. You've furloughed some pilots. Doesn't change the fact that others have rejoiced in this flying to prevent more furloughing. If management has been planning this for a while, it still shouldn't change the reaction of your pilot group. 75% of the mainline pilots are losing there jobs because of an agreement that your management is pursuing. Be careful there. Those pilots will not be all to happy, and there have been blacklist lists' for lesser evils. Be unified and do the right thing.
How about you mind your own business and worry about yourself. Leave the real decisions to the grown-ups and trust that we will do the best we can.
Be careful there. Those pilots will not be all to happy, and there have been blacklist lists' for lesser evils. Be unified and do the right thing.
This is not an alter-ego. Everyone needs to take a step back and give the RAH pilots some breathing room. They have done nothing wrong, and I doubt they will do anything wrong. The decision to do flying for MEH was not theirs, it was Bedford's and Timmmaaaaay's. Until a lawful strike is called, the RAH pilots have no grounds to refuse any flying.
Lawful strike? It's my understanding that if you are not in Sec 6 negotiations and under oversight of the NMB that a collective bargaining unit can strike anytime they want.
No, I don't think so. If you are not in negotiations you would still be under a contract. Under the RLA your contract is extended indefinetly after the amendable date. If you "strike" then that would be unlawful and you will be in court instantly. There will be a restraining order ssued and if you persist, jail time is in your immediate future.
When I say the collective "you" I mean your union officers and in some cases individual members. Ask the AA guys about that. Then came the civil lawsuits, again against individual members.
Trust you. Nice. Mind my own business? You don't know me and you don't know my business. All I know is there aren't many Repubic types speaking up about how this is wrong. Mostly just apathetic statements and avoiding the real issue.
The telling thing will be if RAH has to find people to fly in MKE due to lack of volunteers. If they wind up paying for everyone's hotel on a TDY, then the pilots are not to blame. However, if people willingly bid for MKE then they are to blame.
I can pretty much guarantee that RAH planned on bidding this without paying for every crew's hotel and round the clock per diem in MKE. Stick it to them by having everyone at that airline refuse to bid for MKE.
Trust you. Nice. Mind my own business? You don't know me and you don't know my business. All I know is there aren't many Repubic types speaking up about how this is wrong. Mostly just apathetic statements and avoiding the real issue.