Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Friendliest aviation Ccmmunity on the web
  • Modern site for PC's, Phones, Tablets - no 3rd party apps required
  • Ask questions, help others, promote aviation
  • Share the passion for aviation
  • Invite everyone to Flightinfo.com and let's have fun

First SLI thread of the day

Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Modern secure site, no 3rd party apps required
  • Invite your friends
  • Share the passion of aviation
  • Friendliest aviation community on the web
Pinnacle's method of DOH couldn't have been a surprise to XJ and 9L... It was one of the first things the pilot group brought to our negotiators.

To say that we sprung this last minute is preposterous.
 
Pinnacle's method of DOH couldn't have been a surprise to XJ and 9L... It was one of the first things the pilot group brought to our negotiators.

To say that we sprung this last minute is preposterous.
Your feeding into the political propaganda posted on Internet message boards. The issue wasn't with the entire groups method of DOH, but over 100 DOH adjustments between the original list shared at the start of negotiations, and the updated list shared Monday. The idea of adjusting the DOH to class date is not in question, in fact that's defined in the JCBA contract. That idea is just a internet board distraction. Basically, this was sprung last minute, albeit legal by the terms of the negotiations LOA.
 
Last edited:
I just wonder if Blotch hadn't requested the updated lists, what would have happened to the guys affected. It's a very bad situation that was caused solely by the 9E SLI committee. Had they done their due diligence we would not be here. I'm happy the discrepancy came to light and we had the time to fix it before the ISL was published. But to blame the XJ SLI committee for disputing the list is asinine. It needed to be disputed to verify and fix the discrepancies in the 9E list, otherwise those 9E pilots would have paid the price.

The errors were identified on Monday and corrected by Tuesday morning. There are no more known errors. XJ and Colgan still dispute the PCL list because they don't acknowledge that our posted company hire dates changed with the ratification of the JCBA. Everyone will have their different proposals on the methodology of the list sorting but what XJ and Colgan are trying to do is manipulate the factual data that is applied to the methodology to disadvantage PCL pilots in case DOH has anything to do with the award.

Mesaba and Colgan's position on interpretation of ALPA merger policy just don't fit. PCL new hires have been being paid in training since around 2007. Colgan has a known lack of pay during training over the past 20 years and I'm sure that over the past 30 years Mesaba has had varying pay schemes for its pilots during training. If XJ and CJC want a strict application of the DOH definition in merger policy it will require a full investigation into every last pilot's pay treatment during training and the reordering of all three lists.
 
The errors were identified on Monday and corrected by Tuesday morning. There are no more known errors. XJ and Colgan still dispute the PCL list because they don't acknowledge that our posted company hire dates changed with the ratification of the JCBA. Everyone will have their different proposals on the methodology of the list sorting but what XJ and Colgan are trying to do is manipulate the factual data that is applied to the methodology to disadvantage PCL pilots in case DOH has anything to do with the award
.

Mesaba and Colgan's position on interpretation of ALPA merger policy just don't fit. PCL new hires have been being paid in training since around 2007. Colgan has a known lack of pay during training over the past 20 years and I'm sure that over the past 30 years Mesaba has had varying pay schemes for its pilots during training. If XJ and CJC want a strict application of the DOH definition in merger policy it will require a full investigation into every last pilot's pay treatment during training and the reordering of all three lists.

How do you know this, or are you just speculating?
 
todays the day! we will all know the ins and outs of the SLI by 1259pm! Ahh crap, its 100pm. Never mind
 
The errors were identified on Monday and corrected by Tuesday morning. There are no more known errors. XJ and Colgan still dispute the PCL list because they don't acknowledge that our posted company hire dates changed with the ratification of the JCBA. Everyone will have their different proposals on the methodology of the list sorting but what XJ and Colgan are trying to do is manipulate the factual data that is applied to the methodology to disadvantage PCL pilots in case DOH has anything to do with the award.

Mesaba and Colgan's position on interpretation of ALPA merger policy just don't fit. PCL new hires have been being paid in training since around 2007. Colgan has a known lack of pay during training over the past 20 years and I'm sure that over the past 30 years Mesaba has had varying pay schemes for its pilots during training. If XJ and CJC want a strict application of the DOH definition in merger policy it will require a full investigation into every last pilot's pay treatment during training and the reordering of all three lists.
Just checked with a 23 year guy and a 26 year guy. XJ has paid from day one that far back.
 
yeah the guy "DoingTime" is just pulling crap out of the air-where is he getting this crap? Do your research and find out if Mesaba has changed any pay during training over the last 30 years. ANyone on our list was a full employee and fully paid all through training. Period. It is not Mesaba holding this up, it is guys like DoingTime and their MEC/SLI committee who just make crap up, lie, try to screw over Colgan and Mesaba (don't even tell me that is false). You Pinnacle guys can go ahead and try and change your DOH in your minds, but I am sure a company like Pinnacle is not going to change it because it would cost them a lot of money. Let me ask you this-I really do not know. Were you paying ALPA dues when you were not an employee and not getting paid before your hire date? When you proposed to change your DOH, did you also propose to pay back dues for that time? Oh you did not? Then you are all not in good standing- :)
 
yeah the guy "DoingTime" is just pulling crap out of the air-where is he getting this crap? Do your research and find out if Mesaba has changed any pay during training over the last 30 years. ANyone on our list was a full employee and fully paid all through training. Period. It is not Mesaba holding this up, it is guys like DoingTime and their MEC/SLI committee who just make crap up, lie, try to screw over Colgan and Mesaba (don't even tell me that is false). You Pinnacle guys can go ahead and try and change your DOH in your minds, but I am sure a company like Pinnacle is not going to change it because it would cost them a lot of money. Let me ask you this-I really do not know. Were you paying ALPA dues when you were not an employee and not getting paid before your hire date? When you proposed to change your DOH, did you also propose to pay back dues for that time? Oh you did not? Then you are all not in good standing- :)

Not disagreeing with you, but alpa dues are 1.95% of your pay. if they were not getting paid then, their dues were 0 so, yes they were paying their dues which were 0 dollars and 0 cents.
 

Latest resources

Back
Top