MauleSkinner
Well-known member
- Joined
- Sep 4, 2005
- Posts
- 638
Well, not exactly..."holding out" is one of the things that MAKES it a commercial operation. No money need change hands for the FSDO to call it a 135 operation.taloft said:"Holding out" only applies to commercial operations. Since this guy is advertising for someone to just ride along and look out the window (which is required by regs when wearing a view limiting device), I don't see how that applies. Now if the situation were reversed and he put up a flyer advertising his Safety pilot services for a fee...
The CFI idea is a good one. However, I wouldn't call a CFI stupid if they expected to be paid for giving dual instruction, which is exactly what they will be doing as "safety pilot."
Depending upon how the flyer is worded, and whether they actually land at another airport, I could see how an FAA inspector could twist this into "holding out". They could say that the safety pilot is "paying" (with his safety pilot services) the guy providing the airplane to go somewhere, which WOULD be a 135 operation were it actually the case. The fact that you're willing to use anybody (remember, you're putting up a flyer for everybody), rather than someone you normally fly with, would support this reasoning.
135 violations have been built on not much more than this, unfortunately.
Fly safe!
David
Last edited: