What I saw in the video...
This is not a armchair QB moment. I just observed something that piqued my interest. If anyone sees it differently, please by all means chime in.
It appears to me that the aircraft touched down on the mains (albeit firmly), and the mains stuck. The nose was then lowered and came back up off the runway. In this time though, the mains appear to remain planted on the runway. Having bounced my fair share of planes, even larger ones, I must say that I have never seen main tires stay in contact with the runway so long on a "bounce". The mains come off only after the nose gear comes down and then departs the runway surface again. Even then, there is a delay until the mains lift again.
To me, it seems that the landing should have been successful. The mains were down, and remained down for a decent amount of time. I would venture to say that some sort of pilot-initiated abort occurred prior to the initial touchdown, or at least a significant increase in power that then caused the aircraft to power back off the runway. I am not faulting anyone. If there was an abort decision, I am sure it was justified. it just appears to me that, if the pilots had been so inclined, the aircraft was done flying upon the initial touchdown. The video is quite grainy, so I may be seeing things wrong.
I offer my observation up only as a point of discussion, and not as an attack upon the crew's airmanship or decision making skills. I know heavy aircraft can and do touchdown after a low altitude go-around is initiated. Perhaps the aircraft did not keep up with pilot demands and hindered their go-around procedure.
Any feedback?