"Why are the ex-mil folks so quick to say it ain't so when it clearly is?"
By the way, I am a civilian-only guy at FedEx. I am only trying to make the point that there is a difference between advantage and bias. I'm not trying to shout anyone down, but I have to call BS on the bias.
When one says that there is a bias, it sounds like it's inherent in FedEx's actual hiring practice. I don't consider it a bias when everyone plays by the same rules (i.e. you need a sponsor to get hired). You get a sponsor, you have your fair shot. Once you are in the system, I think it's a fair deal.
Sure, there could be an advantage if you were prior military and you happen to know a ton of pilots at FedEx who will vouch for you. Just like if you live in Memphis you probably know a bunch of FedEx pilots who will vouch for you. Advantage, Memphis pilots!
Why are there more military pilots at FedEx? Perhaps because many of them are not averse to flying at night because they have done it before while flying for Uncle Sam. Most of my friends in the passenger-only world live in fear of the "vampire bit"...they have never flown at night, and assume the worst. I recall that pre 9/11 most of my (civilian / pax flying) friends never even applied to FedEx yet had apps out to every passenger airline out there, good or bad, that operated a Boeing or Airbus product. Even in today's job market, many people won't take FedEx as a last resort because they would have to fly at night for 6-8 months. IMO, dislike for night flying by civilian / passenger only background pilots is a significant factor as to why you have more military pilots here. Now that FedEx is cool, we are seeing an uptick in civilian new hires. The trend will continue.