Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Friendliest aviation Ccmmunity on the web
  • Modern site for PC's, Phones, Tablets - no 3rd party apps required
  • Ask questions, help others, promote aviation
  • Share the passion for aviation
  • Invite everyone to Flightinfo.com and let's have fun

FedEx chief pilot rant

Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Modern secure site, no 3rd party apps required
  • Invite your friends
  • Share the passion of aviation
  • Friendliest aviation community on the web
The best of the best is only one, and redundant at that; "best" being superlative and all. Grammatically speaking of course. Maybe it is big al or JAM-BRO, but it can't be both. Which one will you recommend? ;)


I don't know, maybe we should have a competition to see which one is really the best. I know... we could have a landing competition, and put a quarter 1500' down a runway, and whichever ones main tires come closest could be determined as "the best". I would imagine though, that in their case a quarter is much too big a target, maybe we should use a dime, or the head of a pin....we will probably need to measure the difference in millimeters.
 
We ought to put each interviewee in the MD-10 sim, fully configured and at the marker, day VFR, and tell them to land it. Maybe they get three warm ups or something, then a test one. Throw in a crosswind, and tell them to put the boot in at 300'.

I would also turn off the auto-throttles, but that's blasphemy.....
 
ATS OFF?! Are you mad, man?
 
So what (or who) determines what the "best of the best" is? I'm guessing in your eyes, you guys are it!!! Please forward your names and SSNs to me so I can be sure to put in a recommendation for you, I want to get credit for getting the "best of the best" on property. Thanks!

I am not saying I am the best... I only commented on the hiring practices at FeDex. You can't deny the fact that it is a good ole boys club. When a FeDex CP emails their pilots not to reccommend anyone that ACTIVELY works at any other major but will take NON-ACTIVE furloghees shows to me poor judgement. I've got nothing against furloghed guys. It's that some have not flown in some time versus someone who is current.

I know someone that went thru MD11 training at Fedex and his sim buddy was a Navy guy who could not land with a required 25kt crosswind. The aircraft carrier was always sailed into the wind... Learning to land with a crosswind at FeDex is a little too late in the game.

Hiring should be done by your resume and then thru your interview. Not solely by someone going to their chief pilot and reccommending their bunk buddy. Active_herk is proof of that. "Please forward your names and SSNs to me so I can be sure to put in a recommendation for you, I want to get credit for getting the "best of the best" on property."

Believe me, I would love to work for FeDex. This is not a shot at you guys but at the hiring process. I think it should be more transparent and fair to everyone who does not have the insider ladder
 
Last edited:
I think it should be more transparent and fair to everyone who does not have the insider ladder

While, in essence, I agree, I also think that we should have eternal peace, no hungry or homeless people, and it shouldn't rain on the days I want to play golf. Bruce Hornsby sang eloquently about it, but it really is just the way it is. I think when we weed out all the humans we'll have what we want. Except then I won't be able to play golf. Not saying it's right; it just is.
 
I think it should be more transparent and fair to everyone who does not have the insider ladder

Transparency in hiring? At a US corporation? Are you really serious?

A company is free to use any process to weed through applicants as long as it doesn't discriminate against people in protected categories (race, religion, etc.). Outside of that, if you don't get hired because you were off-key during your rendition of the FedEx fight song during the mandated 'a capella' part of the interview, you're pretty much SOL.

Pie-in-the-skyers will always find the process unfair. Kiss some butt, get your buds to make the right phone calls and key strokes, and within a few years you'll find yourself on the property. It's not rocket science.

Hell I'm still waiting for United to send me my Scantron so I can update with them again. Sure hope I can get Arnautical to get me into the Frasca before my sim check. :rolleyes:

Hoops are hoops, just jump through 'em!
 
I am not saying I am the best... I only commented on the hiring practices at FeDex. When a FeDex CP emails their pilots not to reccommend anyone that ACTIVELY works at any other major but will take NON-ACTIVE furloghees shows to me poor judgement. I know someone that went thru MD11 training at Fedex and his sim buddy was a Navy guy who could not land with a required 25kt crosswind.
Believe me, I would love to work for FeDex.

Actually, It's FedEx, not FeDex. Perhaps if you spelled it that way on your cover letter you might have a shot at an interview.
 
Last edited:
This is not a shot at you guys but at the hiring process. I think it should be more transparent and fair to everyone who does not have the insider ladder
Anytime you have 100 applicants for every position, the process is going to seem arbitrary and/or unfair to 99 of them. Look at it from an employers perspective..they have perhaps an hour or 2 and a background check to ascertain what kind of employee you'll be for the next 30 years. It doesn't hurt to have somebody say on your behalf, "Yea, I know that guy. He doesn't seem like one to pick his nose in the cockpit or f*art before a pack is online, stiff a van driver, trashe hotel room, or spend an entire trip trying to get other crewmembers to buy into his multi-level marketing schemes. And most of all, he seems like the kind of guy who, even when he thinks nobody's looking or cares, would still fly pretty much by the book"

The alternative to personal recommendations for pilots would be for the company to administer a United-style stanine test. Believe me, that has it's own shortcomings.

If you feel you've been overlooked in the hiring process, the only thing I can tell you is to relocate to Memphis and involve yourself in every cultural, civic, and social activity you can think of, paying special attention to those things that appeal to pilot-types in particular. In time, you'll connect with one or more people who will make the necessary introductions to HR.

As for this CP's "rant," I haven't seen it (yet), but if the company has had to cover $170,000,000 worth of broken airplanes and equipment because of complacency on the part of some pilots, he would be remiss in his job NOT to raise he11 about it. FedEx, for the most part, has a pretty good core-group of pilots. Maybe it's time to "cull the herd" a little bit...
 
I don't know, maybe we should have a competition to see which one is really the best. I know... we could have a landing competition, and put a quarter 1500' down a runway, and whichever ones main tires come closest could be determined as "the best". I would imagine though, that in their case a quarter is much too big a target, maybe we should use a dime, or the head of a pin....we will probably need to measure the difference in millimeters.

Maybe a competition of who knows more people...that's the way it is and we all know it. Your post is funny, really, HaHa. I read it a second time and laughed even harder than the first. Getting on at fx is not about being a super pilot. It's about who you blow.
 
ahhh the tone of this discussion is "pilot applicant profile" at Delta Airlines circa mid-90's
 

Latest resources

Back
Top