Deuce130
Durka Durka Jihad!
- Joined
- Jun 9, 2005
- Posts
- 1,237
Laughing_Jakal said:Bottom line is this, the company wanted something. So they engaged the MEC in negotiations and we negotiated a reasonable deal. This is the kind of thing that we want to happen. We need to support this deal 100% because the NC successfully negotiated it and the MEC recommends it. It will become part of the new contract.
We want the company to get the message loud and clear that the Negotiating Committee "Speaks for Me" and we want them to handle negotiations and we will engage good faith negotiations and not "direct dealing"....send the message that the way to negotiate with us is thru the negotiating committee......if you voted no there is still time to change your vote.
Rejecting a legitimately brokered deal that the NC was able to negotiate and the MEC endorses ....but then saying "My Negotiating Committee speaks for me" is the equivalent of Bashing the way "Americans are murdering innocent Iraqis....then cowardly saying "But I support our troops".
If the Negotiating Committee speaks for you.....then this should be a no brainer. If you send the message that you won't accept the deals that they negotiate, then you are asking for cherry picking and "direct dealing". Furthermore, the sticking point in our negotiations is our core goals......and this wasn't one of them.....This one is a bonus.
--Out
Well put. I'll vote yes.