Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Obviously you are management.Not at all. It has a few warts, like allowing 10 hours of block during certain times of day, but overall, it's pretty damned good.
Actually, I don't mind that so much.Not at all. It has a few warts, like allowing 10 hours of block during certain times of day, but overall, it's pretty damned good.
Do you have any constructive criticism of the NPRM, or are you just being a typical flightinfo malcontent with plenty of complaints, but no solutions?
Your high-and-mighty attitude is laughable considering your past decision- making ability in this career.
I'm sure, however, you will say "mostly good is good enough."
Increasing flight times should be an absolute no-go item, irrespective of what is in the rest of it.
9 hours of rest? Inadequate. Seems it can still be reduced to 8 at times, also inadequate.
There should be -zero- items that are unacceptable
I don't really like that part, either. Unfortunately, the science doesn't back up an 8 hour limit across the board. I think they went too far with the 10 hours, though, so hopefully we'll be able to correct that during the comment period.
The 9 hours is time actually at the hotel, which makes a big difference. I think 10 would be better, but again, that's something we can try to fix in the comment period. The important part in the NPRM is that the FAA based the time on time at the hotel, rather than including transportation time like it is now. That's a big step.
I agree, but I think you would admit that we probably won't accomplish that. We're dealing with politicians here, remember. We should do everything we can to clean it up in the comment period, though.