Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
They'll take it to an arbritrator who will enforce seat protection and a blend of DOH/relative seniority. Its federal law.
They'll take it to an arbritrator who will enforce seat protection and a blend of DOH/relative seniority. Its federal law.
I'm not sure we're reading this correctly. there are a few ways that a 'pay protection' could go down.
1 - it depends on if FAPA guys bring their current longevity to any combined list for pay/vacation purposes
2 - it depends on how the integration goes, obviously. any type of ratio/feather and they'd see higher rates from day one at SWA pay so pay protection wouldn't be necessary
3 - assume a staple for the sake of this argument. it wouldn't make sense to 'pay protect' them at 12 year SWA captain rates. it would make sense to make sure they make at least the same as they made at F9 prior to A&M. So, there would seem to be some kind of conversion of their hourly rates to our trip rates, and they would maintain that higher rater until they surpass it at normal SWA pay scales.
doesn't seem that tough to figure out. "pay protection" that paid F9 guys 1st year SWA wages wouldn't be pay protection. neither would "pay protection" that paid the well above their current rates. the idea of pay protection is so that no one takes a pay cut in the merger.
thoughts?
Here is my only heart burn with this incessant 'pay protection' argument. There is more to a career than money. I have made more, I do not want to make less, but I could. What I would rather have is a stable career. That being said, seniority is king. Southwest has been a hugely successful company that has been the place to go for a long time. I remember a time about 10 years ago when United was the place to go. That has not worked out so well for a lot of folks. I am not completely convinced that just paying me more and stapling me is better than a seniority integration at Republic that keeps all my fellow pilots, not just 80% of them, and a future that contains growth.
All that said, it is still too early to worry until the auction is over and we have a winner. Until that time, there is not any point to speculating.
There will not be any kind of vote. The f9 pilots are not choosing between RAH and SWA.
The F9 BOD chooses, and they make a recommendation to the UCC.
There will not be any kind of vote. The f9 pilots are not choosing between RAH and SWA.
The F9 BOD chooses, and they make a recommendation to the UCC.
When I say vote I mean voting for what SWA offers them. I would assume that SWAPA members will get the chance to vote on the proposal. Maybe someone from SWAPA can confirm this.
I've met some very happy former Morris pilots. Good luck to F9 guys, hope everything works out.I have 3 words that are good review on how to correctly or incorrectly integrate yourself with a potential acquiring airline.
1. Muse
2. TranStar
3. Morris.
I cannot, and will not vote for a deal that puts 20% of my fellow pilots on the street on day one of a new deal. They will not see anything in the way of "pay protection" for many many years.
The current bid by WN for F9 is $175m and they only want 40 of the 51 AC that F9 is currently operating. Being that WN is overstaffed and said that they are shrinking their operation this year, it is unlikely that the judge or F9 management will allow WN to take over F9 on these terms. F9 pilots will end up furlough fodder and WN can still say they have never furloughed a WN pilot because it will be 200 F9 pilots that will be getting the axe. Also, many redundant admin staff will lose their jobs do to this. WN is going to have to take ALL the pilots, not just enough to fly 40 aircraft or the judge and/or FAPA will scuttle the deal and we go with RAH. This judge is jobs oriented and not just creditor oriented.
FAPA has more leverage than I believe SWAPA is willing to admit. GK want this deal real bad because WN has failed to compete effectively with F9. I believe they thought they would have us out of business by now. Since WN's product is inferior to F9s, for about the same price, then Kelly feels like it is cheaper to buy the competition than to spend much more money trying to put us out of business over several more years. F9 actually get a small premium over WN on tickets in competing markets. WN is not going to meet it's contractually mandated 5% growth if it does not get F9. WN actually needs F9 worse than F9 needs WN
Having said this I hope that a deal can be worked out with WN if they win the auction. But rest assured fellow animals, FAPA will not accept a staple if it appears that it is to protect current WN pilots from furlough no matter how much money they throw our way to tempt us.