Rez O. Lewshun
Save the Profession
- Joined
- Jan 19, 2004
- Posts
- 13,422
Somehow, the spirit of forgiveness is growing.
The Sunflower by Wiesenthal
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Somehow, the spirit of forgiveness is growing.
What is your aviation background?
I would be willing to be that next time that young Marine finds himself in a jet that is not working right, this incident will pop up in his head...if ever so briefly. I am not questioning whether he did the right thing or not but flying skills and judgment is based on past experience and training. This experience will most likely effect his judgment IF he finds himself in a similar situation. Statistics and studies prove it. The man is human and has suffered a traumatic event and one that he will remember for the rest of his life. It WILL be there when and if. This is in no way an indictment on his abilities as a pilot, Marine, or a human being. He is not super human...this will stick with him. I am sure he will have the mental and emotional fortitude to strap a jet back on and be a wonderful asset to the community.
The same factors effect ground forces to include the most elite of special operations forces. It is the sum of their experiences both good and bad that help guide their actions when bullets start flying.
Let me suggest a good book called "On Combat" by Dave Grossman. http://www.amazon.com/Combat-Psychology-Physiology-Deadly-Conflict/dp/0964920514
There are no pictures in it...just so you know.
F-14 crash after take off from KBNA, 3 on the ground killed.
Pilot error is normally to blame in about 80% of all accidents.
This was serious pilot error. The pilots family was at the airport and he was showing off.
In other words it was negligence and a doesn't help the arguement of houses should not be near airports.
The difference is that an F-18's engines are adjacent to each other and an uncontained failure will probably damage the other engine while this failure mode is unlikely in a 737.
We will have to wait for the investigation results. I just hope it is not something stupid like fuel exhaustion.
The difference is that an F-18's engines are adjacent to each other and an uncontained failure will probably damage the other engine while this failure mode is unlikely in a 737.
We will have to wait for the investigation results. I just hope it is not something stupid like fuel exhaustion.
Another person...How come they didn't divert him to another airport away from homes.
OMG.......STFU.....uneducated DW!!!
Just freaking wait 30 days!!!!!!!!
Well educate me then smartass. Does the -18 have a impenetrable kevlar belt between the engines and accessory bays?
We will have to wait for the investigation results. I just hope it is not something stupid like fuel exhaustion.
Charlotte, NC news (2/29/08) reporting an AV-8B down at Cherry Point.
Hey Milky...who lit the string on your tampon?
Relax dude...
It pisses me off that a guy was risking his life landing on a carrier at night, and this idiot makes stupid remarks.
February? They are just now getting around to reporting it because they were busy getting Obama elected........:laugh:
Do you know enough about the design of the hornet to even ask an intelligent question about it? Obviously not. There are two engines. There is no recorded incident of a chunk failure causing one engine to destroy the other engine.
I have seen landing gear jammed into both intakes and the jet still make it to land. The jet was designed to got in to battle and sustain damage. But, fail to connect the oil line properly to the engine, and just like any jet, it will stop working pretty quickly.
You know, looking back at your original post, I am sorry I even dignified you with a response. You truly are an idiot. You have no idea the mission and training that happens right off the coast. I have nearly had to deal with fuel exhaustion more than once just off the coast of California. There is a HUGE difference between an airline running out of gas and a tactical jet running out of gas. If you knew all the situations we put ourselves into each day that you would consider a serious emergency, you'd keep your stupid mouth shut until you have some clue as to what happened.
edited... I'll just keep my mouth shut
Ableone, Milky makes some very good points... you have NO idea the situations we put ourselves in on a daily basis. Life around the boat in a jet that has no gas to begin with is something you can't even fathom. I routinely (like this morning) return from the warning area with about 20 minutes of gas (2,000 #'s) left.
Why? Because we have to squeeze every amount of training out possible, there's an inherent level of risk involved that we accept, that you would consider a serious emergency. To have someone that knows absolutely ZERO about tactical aviation start spouting off at the mouth second guessing a pilots decisions based on speculation and hearsay pisses off not only him but ALL of us.
You saying that you have never heard of it happening is not at all the same as saying you are aware of a specific feature on the F-18 that protects one engine from the other.As far as an uncontained engine failure taking out the other, I've NEVER heard of it happening in the Hornet.
This jet has taken direct surface to air fire, surface to air missiles, blown up engines, lost entire control surfaces, and made it home time and again. A wild compressor section taking a trip is MINOR.
And WTF are you talking about bleed air and sonic inlet flow? Playing too many video games?
Wise decisions. Catfish is a retired CO, and distinguished vet. I'd be willing to bet he's seen the dark side of aviation on a personal basis more times than you.
Ableone, Milky makes some very good points... you have NO idea the situations we put ourselves in on a daily basis. Life around the boat in a jet that has no gas to begin with is something you can't even fathom. I routinely (like this morning) return from the warning area with about 20 minutes of gas (2,000 #'s) left. Why? Because we have to squeeze every amount of training out possible, there's an inherent level of risk involved that we accept, that you would consider a serious emergency. To have someone that knows absolutely ZERO about tactical aviation start spouting off at the mouth second guessing a pilots decisions based on speculation and hearsay pisses off not only him but ALL of us. As far as an uncontained engine failure taking out the other, I've NEVER heard of it happening in the Hornet. This jet has taken direct surface to air fire, surface to air missiles, blown up engines, lost entire control surfaces, and made it home time and again. A wild compressor section taking a trip is MINOR.
And WTF are you talking about bleed air and sonic inlet flow? Playing too many video games?