Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Friendliest aviation Ccmmunity on the web
  • Modern site for PC's, Phones, Tablets - no 3rd party apps required
  • Ask questions, help others, promote aviation
  • Share the passion for aviation
  • Invite everyone to Flightinfo.com and let's have fun

Experts predict Comair may be sold

Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Modern secure site, no 3rd party apps required
  • Invite your friends
  • Share the passion of aviation
  • Friendliest aviation community on the web

skydraulic

remember
Joined
Sep 5, 2003
Posts
74
http://www.cincypost.com/2004/04/20/region042004.html

Experts predict Comair may be sold
Delta in dire need of cash
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
By Alexander Coolidge
Post staff reporter

Some aviation experts predict Delta Air Lines may sell off one or both of its regional airlines -- including Cincinnati-based Comair Inc. -- to slow its financial tailspin.
Analyst Raymond Neidl of Blaylock & Partners thinks Delta will ultimately sell one or both of the regional carriers to raise money. He noted rivals Northwest and Continental airlines have done the same.

"I think they're going to do that at the end of the day," he said. "There's no reason for them to hold on to them."

Delta, a major employer in Greater Cincinnati and Northern Kentucky, is awash in red ink and its cash on hand is being depleted. Chief executive Gerald Grinstein last week was peppered with questions from investment analysts about the airline's financial options as Delta announced it lost $383 million in another dismal quarter ending in March.

Grinstein downplayed the possibility of a spin-off or initial public offering of stock in the airlines, noting they add passengers to Delta's mainline network from smaller cities.

"We think they're essential," he said. "They feed our hubs and are integral to our operations."

But UBS analyst Sam Buttrick pointed out Delta doesn't need to own the airlines to continue using them to connect to points around the country. Delta could contract with Atlantic Southeast and Comair as it did before buying them.

"The economic benefit could be maintained without maintaining the equity position," he said.

Chris Lozier, an analyst with Morningstar, said such a deal could raise money but might not be enough to make a difference. He said Delta needs to address its uncompetitive operating expenses, such as its industry-leading pilots' salaries.

"They need to generate cash from operations to get themselves out of this hole," he said. "If you can't get a good price, it's not something you can just do -- even though you desperately need cash."

Other experts also stressed a sale of the regionals wouldn't solve Delta's inability to turn a profit or make much of a dent in its $20 billion in debt and long-term leases.

"It would be a Band-aid," said Paul Biederman, a professor at New York University and former Trans World Airlines chief economist. "It's what we did at TWA -- we just sold off assets until we didn't have anything."

Biederman said a sale could only buy Delta time. He said Delta should seek bankruptcy protection to renegotiate better terms for aircraft leases and pilots pay.

Still, other airlines have sold portions of their regional subsidiaries.

Last November, Northwest raised $299 million selling almost 89 percent of its regional carrier, Pinnacle, in an public stock offering. In 2002, Continental raised $300 million with an IPO of ExpressJet that left it with a 53 percent stake in the regional. It has sold off more of that stock since.

Neidl speculated Delta was holding off on a sale to get a better price, but predicted the airline could get only "a few hundred million for each" regional airline.

That would be a far cry from the $700 million Delta bought ASA for in 1999 and the $1.8 billion it spent for Comair in 2000.

Neidl predicted Comair would be a tougher sell because its costs are higher than its sister regional ASA.

Delta has sold other assets to raise cash. Last summer it raised $285 million from selling its 40 percent stake in Worldspan, a computer reservation system.

Spokesman John Kennedy said he wasn't aware of any discussions regarding selling or spinning off regional carriers at this time.

Grinstein has promised the investment community a comprehensive turnaround plan by the end of summer.
 
I'll believe it when it happens. Does make one wonder why ASA received the largest percentage of the RFP award, though. Certainly does make it a more attractive investment that way.

Never a dull day in this industry, that's for sure.
 
Delta bought Comair for $1.8 billion, then they turn around 4 years later and sell us for $200-300 million. That'll look good.
 
What about the $2.3 billion stock buy back per-9-11 that all but vanished when the stocks fell? There have been a lot of mistakes, and Grinstein will have to correct them. As far as "industry leading pilot pay" over here---I think that problem could be fixed immediately if they came to the table---and I bet they would get an immediate 20% pay cut with some other benies that could save them $500-600 million a year---enough to raise bond ratings and possibly get refinancing for the upcoming debt payments. But, they would be crazy to enter Chap 11 without selling Comair and ASA first---every stock holder would ask why that wasn't done first......Sad but true.

Bye Bye--General Lee:rolleyes:
 
Good Idea

Continental has done just fine without 100% of COEX (it still retains some equity). Delta would do just fine without 100% ownership of Comair and ASA - there would be no major operational changes. Makes a lot of sense - and some cash from the spinoff is better than NO CASH....
 
Certainly some pluses for Comair as well. To sell something, you have to market a product that someone else wants to buy. To make a successful IPO, Delta will have to give assurances to the purchasers that there will be a reasonable chance for a profit. For the same reason, it couldn't saddle it with too much debt. Being a two-way street, if Delta was going to require limits on other activites by the company (against flying larger aircraft for example, or flying for other carriers) then the marketplace is going to demand guarantees of return on investment. I'm thinking fee for departure and a guarantee of a certain number of departures per year. If we sell before our contract gets shredded, then those guarantees will have to be based on our current and projected payscales.

I think a couple of posters here think that a sale might be some painful "payback" to the Comair pilot group. But if Delta wants to raise any money on the sale, there has to be some surety that the new independent entity will turn a profit. Otherwise, no institutional investor will touch it. Selling us with our contract intact greatly reduces the chance that we'll have to give up anything.

A bankrupt Delta could try and renegotiate any pre-sale agreements, but I don't think the institutional investors are stupid enough not to factor that into the sales price. Since the object would be to actually sell shares, vice having to pay people to take them off your hands, Delta may have to give up more than it would otherwise want to, only to raise a few hundred million dollars. It will be an interesting exercise if it comes to pass, could actually mean deeper paycuts at mainline.
 
skiddrivr,

If you don't think you guys are also in line for MAJOR pay cuts, you are dreaming. You will get them during the next round of talks, and Delta could give any investors a guarantee that Comair will still be under the Delta umbrella for a ten year period--just like Skywest. But, at the same time you will still be under the Delta pilot PWA--and the associated scope clauses. The key here is that eventually things will turn around, and your contract will be broken with your higher rates going down, which will EVENTUALLY lead to investor profit. There may be some releif on some extra 70 seaters--and that may help too. Also, if investors knew that something that was once worth $1.8 billion and is now on sale for $300-400 million---many may jump at the chance.

Grinstein stated at this last CVG meeting that the current RJ policy is wrong, and that we needed to grow and seek new opportunities--like fighting more out West and eventual flights to more cities in Asia. That doesn't mean he will park any current RJs---it just means you won't see huge future growth, but that doesn't mean investor profits would be down. And, a potential selling of Comair would come along with some debt---which would be used against you guys in your next round of talks---just like we are seeing with us now. As far as deeper cuts for mainline---no, I doubt that. Even the two analysts in this article stated that it won't hurt Delta to sell off the two regionals---nothing will change except some extra cash at Delta. Then the real whipsawing will begin---and the potential investors will get the wage concessions they want. Hey, we were able to sell Morgan Stanley some bonds for $325 million about 4 months ago-------how did that happen? People will take risks---and Comair or ASA could yield them a tasty profit in the long run.....There is little chance that Grinstein would not sell Comair/ASA before any possible Chap 11----every stockholder and his/her lawyer would be asking why that did not happen first....

Bye Bye--General Lee:rolleyes:
 
Last edited:
There is little chance that Grinstein would not sell Comair/ASA before any possible Chap 11----every stockholder and his/her lawyer would be asking why that did not happen first....

Investors would be asking 100s of questions, and that question would be near the bottom.
 
General,

While neither of us is a Wall Street expert (or else we wouldn't be posting on this board), your assertions don't pass the sniff test. Sure, if we remain owned by Delta, our contract is up for grabs in a bankruptcy hearing. But if we get sold off, then our contract is like Skywest's or Chautauqua's - outside of the reach of Delta management. The terms of delivery and payment may be up for discussion, but if there are shares to be sold, those shares need to provide some hope of return. If not, no one will buy them. We have no reason to give up pay yet. If we stay as a wholly owned, it may be forced on us. As an independent financial entity, I don't think so. A separate entity financially controlled by Delta might be a possibility, but then Delta has a fiduciary responsibility to the Comair shareholders as well as the Delta shareholders.

The undertone to your posts on this subject have been - the Comair pilot group will lose pay AND we'll get rid of them by selling them off. To make a sale worthwhile however, it will need to come soon (before Delta burns through all their available cash in 18 months or so), and it will need to provide some hope of return soon, not years down the road. I don't think there is enough time to accomplish both of the things that you seem to hope for. We'll just have to wait and see.
 
Why don't we ask gg why he has a bunch of MD-11's sitting in the desert doing nothing except costing 445 k per month? Each. Seems to me those things ought to be doing a he11 of a lot of flying to pay for themselves and not adding more of a drain to the bottom line. Have the stockholders as that question!!!!!
 
I hope they spin you guys off...you guys are getting beat-up just like United did with us (ACA). When they spin you off, then you can buy Airbuses and you guys can take over the midwest...

ACA will take care of the East Coast...

OK Skywest...we need your non-union punk a$$ out on the West Coast to back us up...

Regional MOB is taking over...

booooooooooooooooyaaaaaaaaaaaaa!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
 
Skiddrivr,

I am just trying to post the obvious, that before any Chap 11 hearing--there would have to be a sale of some assets first---and most of the investors (including the large investors) would ask Grinstein why he didn't sell off ASA/Comair first. That would be their first question. Remember, Grinstein does NOT want us to go Chap 11----he would lose control and he even stated that in the company report (for the share holder meeting in three days--Fri in ATL) that he believes they will NOT have to use Chap 11. So, he must have a plan---and that could include many things. (I am sure pilot pay cuts is first on the list.....)

I am just trying to lay it out the way I think it MIGHT happen. You are right, I am not a Wall Streeter. But, I think you guys (like us) are in for some rough years ahead---and we will both get pay cuts. I just think it is very possible that you guys could get spun off.


ATRDriver,

I agree with you, and I wonder what they plan to do with those 11 MD-11s that cost $15,000 a day each? Could they bring those back and start more Asia service like Grinstein says? Why keep paying for them? Can't we sell them to someone? I did hear that FedEx offered us a very very low ball offer and they refused. We still have the sim in ATL, and supposedly we are training a lot of World Airways pilots currently.

House X,

Even if we did spin them off, they would still be subject to the Dalpa PWA with the scope clause still in effect. But, I do see some 70 seater RJ relief for them eventually.

Bye Bye--General Lee:rolleyes:
 
Last edited:
We've been discussing this through several forums throughout the past month, and it seems as though those who said it would never happen are starting to do the math. Now, what comes next?

For Comair, as its own entity, things will be nothing like before the buyout. Right now Comair and ASA enjoy a 7% advantage over CHQ and SKYW because of their operating margins since all of Comair and ASA's operating margins return to mother Delta. Without that 7% Comair and ASA could not compete with SKYW and especially CHQ. If you thought Delta's request for concessions last October was ludicrous, just wait until our own stock holders ask/demand them. When we inevitably deny the concessions, how many furloughs will there be? At least General will be happy to see Comair pilots on the street. Of course Comair/ASA would not be able to go independent or code-share with any other airlines due to the inevitable 10-year or longer contract. Remember that Comair enjoyed a very liberal contract with Delta before 1999, which was due to be renegotiated, and was one of the reasons Comair decided to sell. The offer on the table from Delta to maintain Comair as a code-sharing regional would not have allowed Comair to be profitable. Comair had two choices, go independent or sell to Delta. We all know which one they chose. What so many people don't seem to understand, however, is that the type of contract Comair could not accept in 1999 is the very same type SKYW and CHQ operate under today, and Comair/ASA may be forced to operate under after an IPO. Comair deemed the contract unprofitable in 1999, so what makes us think that after a significant pay raise resulting from a three month strike we would be profitable now, let alone be able to make the kind of returns Comair made in the previous code-share agreement?

For the Comair/ASA pilot, an IPO is a very bad thing. Best case scenario, there is no more growth...best case!. More likely concessions will be demanded and, god forbid, some aircraft could be reassigned to the cheaper regionals, with furloughs all around.

If I were Grinstein I would IPO ASA/CMR. Take the $700 million total and run. Negotiate a lucritive contract with the two regionals to boost the IPO, and then declare bankruptcy. The contract is then renegotiated at Delta-favored terms, and Comair and ASA suddenly find themselves in the red. The only way to save Comair and ASA then, would be to take concessions, because of course Delta would spin us off with no cash, and a butt-load of debt.

I'm frustrated by the many Comair pilots who are excited about a spin-off because, as they argue, Comair always made money. The kind of returns Comair saw in the past will never rematerialize because the code-share contract they operated under is dead, and never to be resurrected as long as there are the CHQ's and MESA's out their begging for more aircraft at razor thin fee for departure rates. After an IPO, the only difference between Comair/ASA and CHQ/MESA is that Comair/ASA will cost more.

Good morning...*sniff* Is that coffee I smell?
 
Delta is starving for cash? With 2bil in the bank I think we should be talking about how hot the olson twins looked on tv earlier this evening instead. Everyone needs to calm the he11 down. Yeh, yeh, delta has 20 billion in debt payments, due over the next five years. Compare that to revenue and this is one BIG propaganda campaign to get concessions from dalpa. Nothing more, nothing less. BVT, what is this 7% thing your talking about? Are you comparing pilot wages? If pilot wages drove profitability than USairways would be the most profitable airline in the world.

Everyone, step away from flightinfo, walk to the fridge, and drink a beer.

mmmm, I still can't believe that a pint of guiness is only 125 calories!
 
StaySeated said:
Delta is starving for cash? With 2bil in the bank I think we should be talking about how hot the olson twins looked on tv earlier this evening instead. Everyone needs to calm the he11 down. Yeh, yeh, delta has 20 billion in debt payments, due over the next five years. Compare that to revenue and this is one BIG propaganda campaign to get concessions from dalpa. Nothing more, nothing less. BVT, what is this 7% thing your talking about? Are you comparing pilot wages? If pilot wages drove profitability than USairways would be the most profitable airline in the world.

Everyone, step away from flightinfo, walk to the fridge, and drink a beer.

mmmm, I still can't believe that a pint of guiness is only 125 calories!


True.
 
Oh no! The shame of it all! How could those guys live with themselves? Going from being a wholly owned "Delta pilot" to flying for one of those scumbag portfolio carriers. WOW. ;)
 
bvt1151,

First of all, I don't want anyone to be furloughed. You obviously have missed all of my comments on how I would like our own furloughs to fly for someone, even though Comair managment would not allow that without seniority resignation---and ASA's did.
My whole thought here was that it is inevitbale for ALL of US to get pay cuts it seems----and I am not happy about that. And, Grinstein cannot just declare Chap 11 after getting needed cash----that is not allowed. The deal here is that Delta could possibly get cash from an IPO---and still uses ASA and Comair the same way---with a ten year contract like Skywest got. Remember, until shortly after 9-11 Delta owned about $120 million worth of Skywest stock--and then sold it and signed a 10 year feeder agreement. It would make sense to do the same with ASA or Comair, get the cash--pay some bills---and then move forward.


Stayseated is also correct. Delta does have some large debt payments---and the majority start next year. We are looking pretty good for the rest of this year, and hopefully we will be able to come to an agreement and refinance some of that upcoming debt. We don't have $20 billion in debt owed in the next 5 years--that is wrong. We do have some large debt payments---and we have reduced some of our larger capital expenditures due in 2005---like those 777 orders and 11 738 orders. But, we still have $500 million in RJs due in 2005---of course that is our fault (the DL mainline pilots'). Our management, even though they seem to be bailing, has been moving things around to try to make sure we come through with payments in 2005, and a concession package from us is very possible also. I have a feeling it will work out for mainline and Dalpa will agree with management on something, but not everything they want. But, a sell off or IPO of Comair and or ASA is possible.

Bye Bye--General Lee:rolleyes:
 
General,

I'm just trying to state the obvious, just wanting to sell assets isn't enough. You have to to offer something worth buying. Airline IPO's aren't open to the "bigger fool" theory. Wall Street will run the numbers everyway from Sunday. If there isn't any potential for profit, the institutional buyers won't bite. No one is going to buy based on a "and all you have to do is negotiate lower pay from the pilots" profit plan. The numbers for the sale will be built around our contract at the time of sale.

And some folks may be stupid enough to buy shares in an IPO based on a Delta plan to make the spinoff look profitable, and then declare bankruptcy and renig on the terms of sale within a few months, but the big institutional buyers who will be required to float an IPO don't number among those rubes.

The only way to make that work is to negotiate lower pay rates before a sale. They can either enter bankruptcy to force our contract open, or offer something that makes it worthwhile for us to open it ourselves. So while your assertion that Delta may WANT to sell Comair/ASA prior to BK may be correct, the fact is that unless they can create a saleable entity that has the potential to turn a profit for investors in a reasonable period of time (not at some indefinite point in the future) no one will buy it. No matter how much sense it makes to Delta pilots.
 
skiddrivr,

It also makes sense to atleast two major aviation analysts. You can re-read the article if you want. NW didn't wait to get Pinnacle's new pay rates down, they IPO'd it when they needed the cash. Look at CoEX---they are in the middle of talks now, and they IPO'd it two years ago(?). Maybe they will wait awhile until you are about to go back to talks and then IPO it......I don't know.

Bye Bye---General Lee:rolleyes:
 
General,

We don't go into talks for a couple of years. Delta can sell us with our contract intact, go into bankruptcy without selling us and try and get our contract opened in court, or "buy" paycuts from us by giving us something in exchange - then either sell us or not. I never said that Delta wouldn't sell us, what I said is that YOU haven't thought through what it is that Delta might have to offer the marketplace to make the sale, or offer us to get us to open our contract early. If we leave the fold with our contract intact, before bankruptcy, our piece of the recovery concessions goes with us. Any money that could be gained from the sale will only fund Delta's burn rate for a couple of months at the most. The idea that our sale will lessen deep paycuts from your pilot group is wishful thinking on YOUR part, as is the assumption that we will give up any portion of our contract without some reciprocal incentive from Delta management. They don't have a crowbar big enough to pry our contract open...yet.

Now that the spinoff thing is out of the bag, it is in our interest not to give up anything. Reducing our pay would just boost money going into Delta's pocket from the sale. If we have to give up pay, it makes much more sense (from our viewpoint) to do so when it makes our new separate company healthier and more competitive. That's AFTER we're sold, not before. Delta is going to have to offer us a lot to unlock the contract now.
 
Last edited:
Interesting article, it's kinda funny how those who belittle airline "experts" suddenly champion those whose views support their own agendas.

Let's see, getting a "few hundred million dollars each" for a $2.5 billion initial investment and $670 million lost during the strike for a strike that was costed out at $175 million in pilot demands, and desperately needed aircraft wilting in the desert. Yep, there is no limit to the monumentally stupid business decisions Delta has made.

Perhaps Delta might be on its way to becoming a virtual company. All services will be performed by outside companies under more or less direct control ala Delta Ground Services insead of Delta mainline for ground handling. Their largely non union employee groups could be easily split into competing groups, each vigorously competing for work. They do it now in CVG with aircraft cleaning, instead of mainline doing aircraft cleaning, at one point they had four outside companies doing it locked in cut-throat competition.

But there is no reason to expect they would stop short with the pilot groups with this type of business model. Comair and ASA IPOs? Sure it's possible, so is Song and Shuttle and every other flight division at Delta. I think we can compete with them and the rest of the DCI carriers just fine, the question is, (and I think Skids has touched on it) why would Delta pilots want that?

One last point, IPO contractural stipulations would become subject to some sort of renegotiation in the face of Chapter 11. As an independant company, a spun off company such as ASA or Comair would be subject to alter the recently imposed terms. You can't have it both ways.

Interesting times.
 
Last edited:
StaySeated

The amount of cash in the bank is NOT indicative of how close a company is to bankruptcy.

To be honest the company determines its own personal minimums in that regard since the more liquidity you go INTO bankruptcy with, the more likely you are to successfully emerge.

I would venture a guess that around 1 billion Delta's accountants will start recommending chapter 11 in order to restructure debt.

If Comair and ASA are spun off and/or sold prior to such a filing they will be excluded from the restructuring. The company would, however, most likely try to ammend the codeshare agreements (along with agreements with Chautauqua, ASA, Skywest etc...) through the bankruptcy process.

In doing so Delta would take the chance that the "new" Comair might terminate the codeshare agreement altogether, or rewrite the agreement (in exchange for a more lucrative fee-per-departure agreement for Delta) allowing them to pursue codeshare opportunities with other carriers.

Bankruptcy is a slippery slope. I have no doubt that the paperwork is signed and sitting in a locked drawer in Grinstein's desk with the lawyers on speed-dial to run it over to the courthouse some Friday afternoon. The filing's impact on Comair and the career expectations of Comair's pilots is entirely dependant upon Comair's relationship with Delta when it occurs.

Personally i'd much rather be an independant entity, free to negotiate normally with management, than a wholly-owned suddenly FORCED to negotiate by a judge with no knowledge of the airline industry.

When the pilot group was asked to take concessions it was in order to "buy growth". They did the right thing declining that request. You dont buy growth. If the economics of growth exist than the company will grow regardless.

If the pilot group is faced with concessions in order to SAVE the airline, save jobs, prevent the loss of flying -- I personally hope and believe that they will engage the company to prevent the loss of jobs.

I wont "buy" new jobs at this company. But i'll fight like hell to keep the ones we have. From the most junior to the most senior, each job on this property is every bit as valuable as every other job. If we do spin off and go it on our own, i'm willing to work with management to make it a success and to keep all 1800+ of us working. Thats my choice.

If we're still wholly-owned after a bankruptcy filing we simply wont have a choice. We will be solely dependant upon the will of a judge who will likely compare our agreement to Mesa's.

FurloughedAgain(?)
 
IMHO it hasn't happened yet, wall street analysts know absolutely nothing when it comes to speculation. Nobody at Delta has even mentioned a selloff.This is just a goofball analyst making a statement about what he thinks will happen.He must be the almighty Mesia.

Anybody have the number to R. Branson's office. I may want a piece of that new US Virgin airline when it comes around. I will SPECULATE that they will have some good looking FA's.
 
posts

Back when Pinnacle and Express were being put together, I mentioned that the possibility of spinning off a regional was one main reason that a major would never merge talks with their regionals. This is an example of why you have the regional set up in the first place.

In the other two examples, they have contracts for a speicified period and then you are on your own. That does not mean that they would not be attractive, depending on the price. They havea quality fleet and route structure.

With or without a BK consideration, the potential cash influx may be worth it.
 
General Lee said:
NW didn't wait to get Pinnacle's new pay rates down, they IPO'd it when they needed the cash. Look at CoEX---they are in the middle of talks now, and they IPO'd it two years ago(?). Maybe they will wait awhile until you are about to go back to talks and then IPO it......I don't know.

Bye Bye---General Lee:rolleyes:

General,

I agree with you on most of your posts, but I must disagree with this one. I don't have a dog in the Delta / Comair battle, but even so I highly doubt their pilots will vote in any kind of concessions after the lengths they went through to get a decent wage (finally) at a crappy level of this industry.

Your post above makes it seem as though you expect CoEx and PCL to take pay CUTS this time around in negotiations when quite the opposite is true. If you listen to CoEx's union hotlines, the Company has already offered the CoEx pilots close to Comair rates, and the Association turned it down because of other problems in that offer.

Pinnacle is starting negotiations next month and I can guaran-fu*kin-tee you that we're not going to take pay cuts, nor are we going to sign for anything NEAR what Mesaba negotiated for our same seat jet rates which are, by the way, less over the term of their contract than our CURRENT rates if adjusted by 2.5% per year which our current contract does. Are we worried about giving that flying to Mesaba? Not really. We have 89 aircraft right now and our IPO makes it illegal to reduce us to less than 79 aircraft and we could give a d*mn about more growth as long as we have decent pay rates and QOL. Most of us are actually shooting for Comair rates and it would take a bankruptcy filing by NW mainline to change our minds.

The Comair guys might actually be better off if DAL files and they were already spun off because their contract wouldn't be up for discussion and they'd remain profitable - DAL needs the feed. As long as a regional airline is profitable, even if by a thin margin, there is absolutely NO reason to even DISCUSS a pay cut, not here, not CoEx, and certainly not Comair either. Let them find more money from more routes, better aircraft utilization, and new contracts...

Good luck to all of you, I'm back to scouring the jobs to help my dad find a new one after his 23 years at USAirways... Fu*king Bast*rd Siegel needs to be kneecapped for taking his money and running at the first opportunity. :mad:
 
What will Comair have to lose if DAL spins them off? TravelNet at home, DAL flight pass, DAL scope, Limits of aircraft type. I would take the possibilities of getting more and larger aircraft and the ability to fly for other partners over the few little bennies we get from being a WO.

I only hope that ASA can gain it's freedom from DAL before the whole ship sinks into Ch 11.
 
An ASA/CMR spinoff gives DAL four to six months more cash to burn through, then what? It is like amputating because of a cut, it still doesn't stop the bleeding, though.

Big words, Lear70. You talk the talk, let's see if the Pinnacle pilots will walk the walk. Best of luck.
 
Thanks for the good wishes Fly... After being on reserve for three years I'm disgruntled enough to walk NOW. H*ll, I NEED a vacation; can't we just save all the time and effort and strike now? ;)

Kidding of course; the company wanted to start early, wouldn't it be great if they had bigger plans in mind and are willing to give a little more to get a contract quickly? Come on, we can all dream... :D
 

Latest resources

Back
Top Bottom