PastFastMover said:
I am always willing to learn. Could you please explain what you mean by the above. Do you have any studies to support your statement or is this just a gut feel. Not that it matters, but how old are you?
I am 44 years old. In case you want information on my UAL status, I was hired in Jun 00 and furloughed in Mar 02. I have about 1500 pilots to be recalled before I go back to work with UAL.
The reason why I oppose over 60 PIC is because if you allow over 60 PIC, you automatically allow over 60 SIC. Read the accident report of the crew that was supposed to take George Bush Sr to South America. That's why I'm opposed to over 60 PIC.
Spooky1 invoked the name of Mike Melville (63 YO) who flew the first x-prize flight. He did not fly the second. The ground crew called for an abort during the uncommanded roll problems, which he ignored. I don't want someone who ignores black and white calls in the same cockpit as me.
Here's a link:
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/6126386/ (eighth paragraph)
Yes, in public, Mike did a great job. If I were Burt Rutan, I would have beaten him to death with a tire iron. If I were Mike's copilot, I would have gone to pro standards. However, I would prefer to go to pro standards as the captain than the copilot, because 1) I would be more likely to go to pro standards, and 2) my voice would probably carry more weight as a captain.
Too many of us don't know when it's time to hang up the spurs. I hope that I'm not so full of myself that I try to physically intimidate someone 20 years my junior over the internet by saying that I'd pick their 'sorry fat a#s off the bar floor.'
The ego factor alone among pilots is a dammed good reason for the age 60 rule.