HueyPilot
Well-known member
- Joined
- Nov 26, 2001
- Posts
- 207
This just in from CNN.com:
http://www.cnn.com/2003/TECH/ptech/11/26/master.term.reut/index.html
Essentially, an worker out in LA filed a complaint with the equal opportunity office stating that he had seen boxes of computer equipment in which components were labeled "master" and "slave". Here is LA's response:
It appears that our tech manuals can no longer legally condone the reprehensible behavior of refering to one engine as the "master" and the other engine as the "slave" when describing engine synchonizing systems. How racist! Isn't it obvious that by applying those terms to inanimate objects, we're actually offending living people by somehow suggesting that their race is inferior?
OK, back to reality...come on folks, this is ridiculous.
http://www.cnn.com/2003/TECH/ptech/11/26/master.term.reut/index.html
Essentially, an worker out in LA filed a complaint with the equal opportunity office stating that he had seen boxes of computer equipment in which components were labeled "master" and "slave". Here is LA's response:
We would request that each manufacturer, supplier and contractor review, identify, and remove/change any identification or labeling of equipment components that could be interpreted as discriminatory or offensive in nature
It appears that our tech manuals can no longer legally condone the reprehensible behavior of refering to one engine as the "master" and the other engine as the "slave" when describing engine synchonizing systems. How racist! Isn't it obvious that by applying those terms to inanimate objects, we're actually offending living people by somehow suggesting that their race is inferior?
OK, back to reality...come on folks, this is ridiculous.