I speak to that by pointing out that nobody is being thrown off of Love Field now. American Airlines agreed to give up their gates there (that they weren't even using) as a condition to get the government to approve their merger with USAir. They didn't have to merge. They didn't have to agree to divest those particular things. They didn't have to agree to anything; they had an expedited court date to fight. Or, they could have picked other assets to divest themselves of to satisfy the government.
The actual fact is that American giving up sub-leased gates at Love Field is just like them giving up sub-leased slot pairs at LGA. It's an empty, face-saving gesture. How much of a burden is it for American to "give up" things they weren't even using in the first place? All it does is pads the list of things that they "gave up" so that the government could say that they got more concessions from the mega-merger than they really did.
Well, I suppose you could look at the side that Delta (who owned nothing there) might be forced out. But that's only because Delta didn't own the gates they were using, and its landlord got rid of the asset out from under them. But that's hardly Southwest's doing. They're more than welcome to bargain with the new owner (whoever that may be) to continue to rent those gates. On the other hand, maybe they should have bought them from American before all this went down; then they wouldn't be in this mess.
Bubba