Falconjet
Well-known member
- Joined
- Mar 28, 2002
- Posts
- 1,586
Airline Job Aspirations
If you have ANY interest in getting an airline job when you get out of the military you should be logging your time in a logbook yourself. You should also review it once in a while to make sure it jibes with your AF Form 5 if you have one. You can add the sortie correction as you go if you log it yourself or you can try to add it all up later on in life. It would be a heck of a lot easier to just keep a real time log (esp with computer programs so easy now) as you go with your signature at each year or month or some other duration to vouch for your times. Its not that hard to do. Figuring out which time to log and how, however, seems to be quite a source of debate.
tkr-toad: I don't think the AF folks are biased, I just think often readers get confused when AF folks generalize their AF experiences by saying "military" instead of "AF". They sometimes assume that the way they did it in the AF is applicable to any military pilot, but its not. No big deal, just a point of order perhaps.
YeOldeProp: Yes the CG was in the DOT, but were incorporated into the new Dept of Homeland Security last year. Still the same service (I think), but no longer having to battle the FAA for funds through the DOT. Most Coasties think that is a change for the better.
FJ
If you have ANY interest in getting an airline job when you get out of the military you should be logging your time in a logbook yourself. You should also review it once in a while to make sure it jibes with your AF Form 5 if you have one. You can add the sortie correction as you go if you log it yourself or you can try to add it all up later on in life. It would be a heck of a lot easier to just keep a real time log (esp with computer programs so easy now) as you go with your signature at each year or month or some other duration to vouch for your times. Its not that hard to do. Figuring out which time to log and how, however, seems to be quite a source of debate.
tkr-toad: I don't think the AF folks are biased, I just think often readers get confused when AF folks generalize their AF experiences by saying "military" instead of "AF". They sometimes assume that the way they did it in the AF is applicable to any military pilot, but its not. No big deal, just a point of order perhaps.
YeOldeProp: Yes the CG was in the DOT, but were incorporated into the new Dept of Homeland Security last year. Still the same service (I think), but no longer having to battle the FAA for funds through the DOT. Most Coasties think that is a change for the better.
FJ