abxaviator
Well-known member
- Joined
- Aug 12, 2002
- Posts
- 372
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I appreciate Euro's insight. I think the info. he posted is plausable. Lets face it if the UPS deal falls apart, which is likely, DHL will have to continue using ABX and Astar 767s, A300s and DC8s at least for a while. At some point they will pick one airline or the other but from what we have all seen it takes DHL a long time to make decisions. Either way, ILN is not an option for the few flights they are operating now.
I take the part about ABX screwing things up for DHL with a grain of salt. I am sure there is some truth to it but it may be exagerated.
As for the 40,000 lay offs, I think that may be an accurate number. He said INCLUDING contractors. DHL had 40,000 direct employees and I think about 25,000 of contract employees in the US.
Because it's not cost-effective to keep a facility the size of ILN open just to service 15-20 flights a day, 5 days a week? From what I've been told, the CVG hub had some problems, but was more than capable of handling 100,000 shipments per night.Why would ILN not be an option for them? Not that it matters, I just would like to know how ILN is not feasible. Of course they would still have to dump it since it is costing them $$$$. But if they did dump it off to the state in exchange for landing fees to the property value, how would that not actually work to their favor to stay put?
Whichever airline(s) will be doing the job will integrate fully with the way DHL does business in the rest of the world. No C-cans; adopting the same rules, procedures and standards as everyone else. Note, I'm not talking about the actual flying SOPs here, "just" everything else.
Big wigs making huge decisions. What a joke! The idiots that would make that decision are not likely in Kentucky any more than they eat at Holiday Inn.Ive got a friend in upper management at DHL. He keeps telling me that CVG is leading the pack to handle all of the shipments.
Just to confirm that they are looking hard at it. I had recurrent in cvg a couple weeks ago and there was about 20 management guys in DHL shirts eating at the Holiday Inn right next to the sort facilitie. Called my buddy and he said it was the big wigs making "huge deceisions."
Ive got a friend in upper management at DHL. He keeps telling me that CVG is leading the pack to handle all of the shipments.
Just to confirm that they are looking hard at it. I had recurrent in cvg a couple weeks ago and there was about 20 management guys in DHL shirts eating at the Holiday Inn right next to the sort facilitie. Called my buddy and he said it was the big wigs making "huge deceisions."
As a point of customer service, I never received any notification that domestic service was being terminated.
You may want to check the news about DHL every now and then.
http://money.cnn.com/2008/11/10/news/companies/dhl/?postversion=2008111010
"DHL TO CUT 9,500 U.S. JOBS
The firm will end deliveries within the U.S., but will continue shipments to other countries."
It's been in the news continuously since last November when DHL announced their stateside suicide.
"DHL's 9,500 job cuts are on top of 5,400 job reductions announced earlier this year. After these layoffs, between 3,000 and 4,000 employees will remain at DHL's U.S. operations, the company said.As a pilot and International DHL customer, how will the domestic portions of an International Express shipment be picked up and delivered if there is not domestic service??? Are my 3-4 day express shipments now going to take 7-9 days.
The revenue will be decreased by roughly 92%(!), with an expected daily volume of around 100K shipments, down from around 1.5 million.
Why not just shut down completely?
So you think ABx will get the contract with help from Ohio?
Tell them I said to not let the door hit them in arse on the way out of the US. Oh, and tell them I have some extra Federal Express envelopes if they ever desire for anything to actually get where it needs to go. They have management that actually knows how to run a cargo business.![]()
Because DHL Europe has to offer service to the US in order to attract more shippers. If they keep 103 stations in the largest markets of the US, they can say they cover, say 70 percent of the US population (Don't know the real number). They may lose money, I think I saw somewhere in this thread 200 mil a year. But those accounts might go somewhere else if that service isn't offered. I guess I liken it to the grocery store selling toilet paper cheap to get people in the door. I believe the term is loss leader.
I hear you, but to use the entire US market as a loss leader?
Problem with your logic is you still think DHL is swinging the big stick on the international segment. Fedex and UPS have seen almost all of their growth from the last couple of years come from the International segment. They are gonna eat DHL's lunch within 5 years. Period. No reason to ship DHL anymore when Fedex and UPS do the same thing, only better...
Big wigs making huge decisions. What a joke! The idiots that would make that decision are not likely in Kentucky any more than they eat at Holiday Inn.
You Da Man! I stand corrected. I guess DHL big wigs DO eat at Holiday Inn.
Remember - 六四屠城