Whistlin' Dan
Well-known member
- Joined
- May 18, 2006
- Posts
- 460
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
So, basically, DHL tears up it's contracts and "invites" everybody to re-bid? There are a lot of airplanes out there doing nothing, and a lot of guys who don't want to be on the street, especially in this economy.
So much for "Quantum Leap"
Interesting take Eric. I wonder if DHL would do as you say. Their past experience has been they are complete idiots when it comes to business in the USA. I personally do not think they are capable of learning either A) lessons from their past disaster or B) not trying to do business here as they do abroad.
I really do wonder what will become of them now that their monopoly is 1 year over. Will they even be able to compete globally now they do not have that nest-egg any longer? They do provide a good product overseas, but that is not the USA and now they have a stronger international UPS and FedEx to contend with there.
Time will tell. But I think they are tango uniform in the USA with no ability or even desire to learn how to do business here. Had they been willing to learn, they would have listened to Airborne in the first place. Yes, they admitted that already. But what (if anything) will they do about it?
EDIT: Evidence of that can be seen right here with the first post if the thread. Weenie seems to be in some upper management role and seems to toss a few back with some big brass in DHL. But what does he imply? That contractors "will" conform to the way DHL does business "everywhere else". What kind of dope thinks the contractor tells the business owner what flies and what does not? What morons think ABX made the decisions that DHL was responsible for? Well, seems DHL are the dopes and morons since they seem to be placing blame on an outside contractor for their failures and decisions. If ABX were not providing the contracted services, then DHL would definitely file breach of contract as they have in the past with so many. Then they b!^*# and moan about ABX fought us over this and over that. Well dopes, that is because you were destroying yourselves from the inside out. ABX tried to tell them (they seem to think that is fighting them) and then ABX did it the DHL way. The way they wanted and did not listen to what was being told to them. And....the rest is history. Look what happened doing it the "DHL way" here in the USA. Good job.....!#&$%$
So much for "Quantum Leap"
Guys, the reason DHL stays in the US is not to serve the US market - it's to serve our international customers. They've insisted we continue to provide an import and export business in the US, and that's all that'll be provided for the foreseeable future. The company has supposedly analysed the volumes, and seem to think it'll be around 75-100K shipments a day, and have also come to the conclusion it can be done with a fleet of around 20 to 30 aircraft.
All ground-ops hubs have already been closed, along with around 300 of 400 stations. In other words, a little less than 25% of service centres will remain, and there'll be no linehaul by road. The US market is not expected to generate enough revenue to sustain a return to profitability; the majority of the business will be imports to the US.
...(C-containers with no tracing possibilities was one of the issues).
ABX also did what they always done, namely fill up the aeroplanes even with 2nd day freight - and that's a surefire way of eroding your own revenue potential (why pay for 1 day service if the cheaper 2nd option delivers the same result?).
Suffice to say, the relationship between DHL and ABX was somewhat toxic. That's one of the things that'll be changed this time round.