Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Friendliest aviation Ccmmunity on the web
  • Modern site for PC's, Phones, Tablets - no 3rd party apps required
  • Ask questions, help others, promote aviation
  • Share the passion for aviation
  • Invite everyone to Flightinfo.com and let's have fun

Details about the near-crash in Germany

Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Modern secure site, no 3rd party apps required
  • Invite your friends
  • Share the passion of aviation
  • Friendliest aviation community on the web
"Sidestick takeover command button?" What the hell is that? Is this an airplane or a PS3 console? Plastic French crap.

That is right DC9 boy..... enjoy eating your Pascals on your lap.....

I got a nice pullout table I'd like you to meet....

:D
 
Let's face it. Male or female, Ab initio pilots SUCK.

And yet it is the future... not much you can do about it...

Control what you can.....


on general topic...

Seems to me a little rudder skill is in order....

Rudders are for two reasons: xwind landings and V1 cuts.... but it seems most can't even do that....



go get some tailwheel time....
 
If it actually takes 6 months to be able to touch the controls- they shouldn't be pilots at all.
You've obviously never tried to fly a 20-series Lear at 300 hours total time coming straight out of a Duchess and/or 172.

Flying the CRJ is like flying a Baron compared to flying the Lear. The quote from AbleOne is most accurate: "Razor sharp pitch control, split-second decision-making". It's not that it's a hard airplane to fly, it's that it can get away from even a seasoned pilot if your attention is diverted for even 2 seconds.

New pilots just don't have the scan to keep up with the airplane when you're taking off empty at 50 degrees OAT with only 3,500 lbs of fuel on board because you're doing your last leg home and it's CAVU and only a 20 minute flight. To be more specific, my last flight like this had a 1,500 ft displaced threshold. We were airborne before we reached the Fixed Distance Marker (less than a 2,000 foot takeoff roll) and cleared 10,000 feet AGL before the end of the runway in the climb.

Then, when you level off at 10,000, if you don't bring the power back aggressively (from 97% to 70% or so), it will go from 200 kts to red line (307) in less than 10 seconds, then the overspeed horn is screaming at you, plus you're fighting just to hold your altitude as the pitch changes with the center of pressure movement along the chord.

No, I'm not exaggerating. The only other aircraft that perform like it are the G-2 (and the MU-2 for roll rate but not climb speed). Period. It's NOT a good airplane to make a transition into the turbine world, much less the jet world, but they catch up... eventually.

THAT'S why Argus (insurance) minimums for 20-series Lear Captains are DOUBLE what they are for 30- and later series Lear Captains and why the DoD won't allow any pilots on DoD contracts that don't have 250 hours in type for the Lear, but will take 100 in the Falcon.

Joe, I work for Kalitta. They're just being safe, realizing that the pilots are qualified and checked per the FAA, but that they're not ready for many of the flight situations they're going to get and want the CA to fly until the F/O's are good and comfortable with the PNF aspects before they start trying to mix a new aircraft, new operation type, high-altitude airspace nav, and high-density ATC work with flying an aircraft that averages 200-300% faster in all phases of flight than they're used to.

That's also why many regional airline FOM's state not only that the CA is the final authority as to who flies, but also that although it is customary to swap legs, the CA is under no obligation to do so if he/she deems it necessary for the safety of flight (straight out of the PCL FOM).

I'm a firm believer that to be an Airline Pilot, you should have to possess an Airline Transport Pilot license, including the minimum flight times to obtain it. Go build time where you're not risking the flying public. I did, so did many others; it's called "paying your dues", and I don't mean with Daddy's wallet (or a student loan you can't possibly hope to pay back for at least a decade or more).
 
Last edited:
That's also why many regional airline FOM's state not only that the CA is the final authority as to who flies, but also that although it is customary to swap legs, the CA is under no obligation to do so if he/she deems it necessary for the safety of flight (straight out of the PCL FOM).

I'm a firm believer that to be an Airline Pilot, you should have to possess an Airline Transport Pilot license, including the minimum flight times to obtain it. Go build time where you're not risking the flying public. I did, so did many others; it's called "paying your dues", and I don't mean with Daddy's wallet (or a student loan you can't possibly hope to pay back for at least a decade or more).

Exactly correct.....ALPA could make this a priority and possibly enlist help from the media and the insurance companys...

This is a true safety issue that has collective bargaining implications.....

Other professions have managed to regulate the barriers to entry much better than we have.....
 
I couldn't even finish reading those articles, basically praising the pilots for saving peoples lives. The 24 year old pilot who was apparently flying in hurricane weather, if you watch the video, you'll see that was the worst crosswind technique possible. I didn't even check what the experience of the fo was. In my opinion they should be fired.
 
Apologies Lear- I haven't flown the Lear, but my old instructor flew at Kalitta and used to tell stories. All i'm saying is that i'll take a good attitude pilot who has been conscientious and shown ability their whole career w/ lower time- than somebody acting as a dead weight in the right seat building time- I really have flown w/ 3000 hour pilots who struggled much more than many 1000 hour pilots. Merit in aviation does matter.
I'm a fan of the majors taking back flying that should be theirs. We don't need 25 yo's w/ 2500 hours being captains on jets flying 50-90 people around on terrible work rule contracts that make you tired and don't attract the best pilots.
 
Last edited:
agreed on the barriers to entry part. as much as i agree that those w/ ability will do well whenever they get the opportunity- the risk goes down w/ flight time. Maybe they'll also appreciate the job more and demand better contracts if it took more effort to get the job.
 
I can. Our F/O's aren't even allowed to TOUCH the controls for the first 6 months until they've been signed off by 3 Captains AND a check airman. For ANY phase of flight.

Man it must be hard to get signed off when you can't even touch the yoke. So what do they do to get signed off? They talk you through an ILS? I guess there has to be a reason for getting the FOs your company is getting.
 
Exactly correct.....ALPA could make this a priority and possibly enlist help from the media and the insurance companys...

I thought you rejected alpa...why do you expect them to do this?

in addition, alpa couldn't work on this for a while because of certian lawsiut....

Finally, its a great idea! can you provide the critical thought of application?
 
Man it must be hard to get signed off when you can't even touch the yoke. So what do they do to get signed off? They talk you through an ILS?
They get signed off from PNF to F/O (which allows them to fly) by flying an entire day without missing anything (radio callouts, navaid settings, GPS programming, clearance, preflight, checklist, standard callouts, etc).

Seriously.

I guess there has to be a reason for getting the FOs your company is getting.
The same reason EVERYONE is hurting for F/O's, even the regionals who are hiring people with wet commercial certificates.

Not many people want to spend $150,000+ or more to get all their ratings and get to where you can become a regional f/o making $18k a year...

I don't blame them.
 
They get signed off from PNF to F/O (which allows them to fly) by flying an entire day without missing anything (radio callouts, navaid settings, GPS programming, clearance, preflight, checklist, standard callouts, etc).

Seriously.

Man, I wouldn't make it one leg, let alone the entire day, not to mention the entire tour!
 
Man, I wouldn't make it one leg, let alone the entire day, not to mention the entire tour!

So they have one good day and they're good to go. Meanwhile they don't know the difference between wing into or wing away from the wind on a crosswind landing. Yeah, that perfect day of never missing a radio call is the acid test alright. :laugh:
 
We all need to be teaching all the time. We all need to be learning- ALL the time.

In this case it needs to be stressed that in a crosswind- the wingtip that is in the most jeopardy is the downwind wing- and stress the reasons why.

Do that and it's a lot funner. Those who run away from that- run into situations like this and can't handle them.

ps- doesn't matter how good you used to be either.
 
Heh-heh . . . Reminds me of a story told to me by a Learjet pilot who was trying to break in a former MU-2 driver on a LR25.

He said when they were approaching an assigned altitude, it would go something like this:

"Two thousand". . "One thousand" . ."My Airplane!"

.
 
Not my policy, don't shoot the messenger.

And, in case you missed, it, it's not a nomination for upgrade training, just being allowed to start flying some of the empty legs that don't have weather or mx considerations so that they start building experience, then they get to fly live legs, then they get signed off as LSA (Left Seat Authorized), then they get recommended for upgrade.

Not a perfect system, but it's working,,, FWIW.

Ty, that's not far from the truth. Nothing like climbing so fast the needle is stuck on 6,000 fpm (and you don't really know what the rate is - it's been clocked upwards of 10,000 fpm by ATC) and the guy isn't slowing his climb down 2,000 feet from level-off.
 
We all need to be teaching all the time. We all need to be learning- ALL the time.

In this case it needs to be stressed that in a crosswind- the wingtip that is in the most jeopardy is the downwind wing- and stress the reasons why.

Do that and it's a lot funner. Those who run away from that- run into situations like this and can't handle them.

ps- doesn't matter how good you used to be either.
Very true.
 
I thought you rejected alpa...why do you expect them to do this?

I don't expect them to do this....they will probably fail with this issue too....

Rez O. Lewshun said:
in addition, alpa couldn't work on this for a while because of certian lawsiut....

Are you referring to the RJDC lawsuit? It has already been settled....Why are you using it as an excuse...Surely you can come up with a better one....

Rez O. Lewshun said:
Finally, its a great idea! can you provide the critical thought of application?

Yes I can.....Press releases to the media regarding the experience level of new pilots and passing this information along to the major aviation insurance companies along with a sit down with them to address the potential issue it may cause with regards to safety.....In addition, I would recommend a full court press opposing the MPL based on safety issues....
 

Latest resources

Back
Top