Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Friendliest aviation Ccmmunity on the web
  • Modern site for PC's, Phones, Tablets - no 3rd party apps required
  • Ask questions, help others, promote aviation
  • Share the passion for aviation
  • Invite everyone to Flightinfo.com and let's have fun

Delta the Least Respected Brand in America

Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Modern secure site, no 3rd party apps required
  • Invite your friends
  • Share the passion of aviation
  • Friendliest aviation community on the web
You might want to read it again, Scoot; I think he was sticking up for you.

Bubba
No Bubba, I got it right. His childish infatuation with Delta is noted. I still think his diaper is dirty, and it might be time for his bottle.
 
Bubba,

As I said before, it's a shell game. Our Chief Pilot is a SWA pilot. His underboss is on SWA Manager pay. He's on the AirTran seniority list and voted. There's a Single Operating Certificate. AirTran pilots receive Southwest profit sharing. The profits we make are Southwest profits. Every AirTran pilot works for Southwest, under a convenient shell called AirTran.Which ends when again? Our work is outsourced by Southwest on a lower pay scale. Which ends when again exactly, and was voted overwhelmingly by let me think, AirTran pilots.

Perhaps we're like Comair ? They were owned by Delta yet operated separately. That's outsourcing isn't it Bubba ? No, Comair is outsourcing, what is happening at SWA is the winding down of AT, you know that's happening right? You're seeing fewer and fewer 737's and 717's every week, guys going through SWA training to become SWA pilots. Nothing like what happens with Comair. You dont like that, right Bubba ? Your allowing it with the same aircraft type at a lower pay. But it all drops dead Sep 2014 or Jan 1 2015. Does Comair have a drop dead date?

You're having to split hairs in order to justify your reasoning. I would say a separate company operated in perpetuity and one that is being dismantled with an end date, is not splitting hairs. It's a temporary B Scale and its outsourcing. 50% right, it's a B scale approved by all AT pilots, but it has and end date, also approved by AT pilots. Approved by SWAPA in exchange for a seniority bump. Wow you got one right. You're unable to call it a B Scale and outsourcing because its embarrassing and doesn't fit your self image. I'm unable to call it a B scale beyond the day any pilot becomes a SWA pilot, what is that, 40 or so a month, and the end date of 31 Dec 2014. Individually, and as a group.
added for content
 
This thread took an unexpected turn. What difference do the things you guys are fighting about make? If you're happy where you are then be thankful and be glad someone else is happy where they are. And of its not your company then what's happening there isn't your business.
 
Last edited:
You might want to read it again, Scoot; I think he was sticking up for you.

Bubba

Hating runs strong in that one Bubba- he just wanted to use that line-

In the meantime- Delta's not close to the worst brand in the airlines (probably the beat of the big 3) much less across industries-

dumb article
 
But it all drops dead Sep 2014 or Jan 1 2015. Does Comair have a drop dead date?


That would have been funny if you weren't serious. Google Comair and check out their "drop dead date".

No, I'm not noticing less aircraft. Perhaps I need to pay more attention. We have all of our 717s on property still. With the exception of one painted in DAL colors. How many AirTran 737s have gone to SWA to date ........ ?
 
That would have been funny if you weren't serious. Google Comair and check out their "drop dead date".

No, I'm not noticing less aircraft. Perhaps I need to pay more attention. We have all of our 717s on property still. With the exception of one painted in DAL colors. How many AirTran 737s have gone to SWA to date ........ ?

Rumor has it that 6 717s per month will be delivered until the end of the year instead of 3 per month, but it will return to 3 per month in Jan. There are a bunch parked at the hanger on the other side of 9R at ATL. I believe a couple may be down in MIA for the mx checks and wifi/paint job.


Bye Bye---General Lee
 
I'll give you a hint: In the process agreement (which you clearly haven't read), both unions AGREED to send the negotiated agreement to their respective constituencies for a vote. THEN, and only then, the next step was mediation and arbitration, IF either side voted down the agreement. It became clear that the ALPA leadership at AirTran had absolutely NO intention of honoring their word and allowing a vote. They were pushing to go straight to arbitration from the get-go.

That's why, General. Anything ELSE you'd like answered?

Bubba

Bubba, you are mistaken. The Merger Committee only had the authority to negotiate, it was never empowered to accept an Agreement, that authority rests with the MEC, just like during Contract Negotiations. You never give your negotiators the ability to accept the Agreement, that is standard, and I'm sure SWAPA's leadership also had the final authority as well.

It was up to the MEC to decide whether the Agreement brought back by the Merger Committee met the minimum standards, sending it out for Member Ratification, or to send them back to the table. If there was not a desire from the other party to continue negotiations, or if time ran out, it was to proceed to binding Arbitration, as agreed to under the Process Agreement.

Unfortunately, instead of proceeding under the Process Agreement, we got threatened with being parted out, and thus the underwhelming Agreement was overwhelmingly voted for.
 
Last edited:
Bubba, you are mistaken. the Merger Committee only had the authority to negotiate, it was never empowered to accept an Agreement . . . You never give your negotiators the ability to accept the Agreement, it has to be done by the MEC, just like during Contract Negotiations.

It was up to the MEC to decide whether the Agreement brought back by the Merger Committee met the minimum standards, sending it out for Member Ratification, or to send them back to the table. If there was not a desire from the other party to continue negotiations, or if time ran out, it was to proceed to binding Arbitration, as agreed to under the Process Agreement.

Unfortunately, instead of proceeding under the Process Agreement, we got threatened with being parted out, and thus the underwhelming Agreement was overwhelmingly voted for.

Your right Ty. The MEC piece was in there, but they never had any intent of sending anything out.....ever. Their end game was to run the clock out for arbitration. Didn't it take them three days to look over the agreement that they supposedly knew nothing about? Arbitration was their only game.
 
Your right Ty. The MEC piece was in there, but they never had any intent of sending anything out.....ever. Their end game was to run the clock out for arbitration. Didn't it take them three days to look over the agreement that they supposedly knew nothing about? Arbitration was their only game.

Well, with a fool like MaxBlast representing us at the table, can ya blame them? :laugh:
 

Latest resources

Back
Top