Delta TA-whos seen it?

[BILL LUMBERG]

6 year deal? No way...

 

[bigshooter107]

6 yr deal

19% DOS
2.9% each year
That's 33.5% after 6 yrs.

Scope:
76 seat max
Remove "widebody" clause
For every 1 new mainline A/C = 1 new DCI 76 seat A/C


Will see how close I got it.....

Heard the same thing...

 

[Cobraair75drvr]

what is "widebody" clause?

 

[Schwanker]

what is "widebody" clause?

If I understand it correctly:

You had 6 or more drinks in the previous 90 minutes and it's after midnight, you take the fat chick!:beer:

 

[bigshooter107]

If I understand it correctly:

You had 6 or more drinks in the previous 90 minutes and it's after midnight, you take the fat chick!:beer:

"wide body" clause. Love it...

 

[GogglesPisano]

If the MEC approved a 4,8,3,3 deal they'd be faced with the very real possibility of a recall.

 

[777forever]

If the MEC approved a 4,8,3,3 deal they'd be faced with the very real possibility of a recall.

No kidding


Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk HD

 

[Hamfighter]

If thats the big offer, it's a big no.

 

[FBN0223]

A 4,8,3,3 deal would be the end of ALPA at Delta. By Friday, the DPA would double it's membership and bid ALPA farewell.

 

[Hamfighter]

I thought the overall theme of the alpa survey was southwest or better money and no more scope relief. Remember, they heard us "loud and clear."
I double-dog dare them to offer less.

 

[crazy8]

LGA-ORD / JFK-ORD

On second thought, meh. 1st and 3rd most populous cities in the country, let the RJ pukes handle it. Who cares what our customers think.

RJ pukes? Fukc off dude. As$holes
like you are the problem with this profession. I'm sure you were born in the left seat of a 777.

 

[General Lee]

6 yr deal

19% DOS
2.9% each year
That's 33.5% after 6 yrs.

Scope:
76 seat max
Remove "widebody" clause
For every 1 new mainline A/C = 1 new DCI 76 seat A/C


Will see how close I got it.....

I don't know about your guess. The DOS % should be about right, but the length of the contract is too long, and I would guess the company would want more 76 seaters, but 1 for every new mainline plane won't do. I would guess they would get a limited number for dumping 50 seaters, like 1 76 seater for every 3 they dump. They want to dump them, they have said so. If the 717s or A319 rumor is true, then there could be a lot of new planes, but the problem is in the last agreement there was a clause for 3 76 seaters for every new mainline plane over a certain number (I don't think we got there), but when a mainline plane was parked (like most of the DC9s), NONE OF THE RJs were parked. Who the heck didn't figure that out? If mainline planes are parked, so should RJs. That better be in the upcoming TA.


Bye Bye---General Lee

 

[Hamfighter]

I don't see how 19% DOS is acceptable. It shouldn't take six years to match SW on narrow bodies.

 

[Hamfighter]

And...
NO. More. RJs.
I spent seven years at regionals. I'm not wishing that (or more) on anybody.

 

[bigshooter107]

I'm thinking he was suggesting a more or less re fleeting of the RJ population with 900s, when delta comes to a number on the amount of RJs in th DCI system they would allow most of them to be 76 seaters..