Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Friendliest aviation Ccmmunity on the web
  • Modern site for PC's, Phones, Tablets - no 3rd party apps required
  • Ask questions, help others, promote aviation
  • Share the passion for aviation
  • Invite everyone to Flightinfo.com and let's have fun

Delta TA Scope

Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Modern secure site, no 3rd party apps required
  • Invite your friends
  • Share the passion of aviation
  • Friendliest aviation community on the web
WhatRUSmokinGL? said:
HAHAHA!!!!!

Nice, I have achieved pal.

Of course a truly arrogant person would say that you only succeed if you end up like them. And you never fail to act accordingly.

I don't worship you. I highlight your lies, arrogance, and bloviating. You just don't like it.

You are still obsessing. I am glad you THINK you are doing a great service by trying to expose my supposed lies and mistruths, but in reality you are showing everyone you worship me and what I say. Stop it. Please, get help. You need to get better, and by making up false claims and telling everyone GL thinks he knows the future, when even I know that to be false. Giving educated guesses is better than staying silent. If you are so bent on trying to compare my opinions to absolute LIES, then you have some mental problems. Guessing what will happen is not a bad thing, and I have never stated I had any inside information. Saying what may happen without inside information equals guessing. You know that, right little buddy? Are you ok now? Get a hanky and wipe your nose please.


Bye Bye--General Lee
 
General Lee said:
You are still obsessing. I am glad you THINK you are doing a great service by trying to expose my supposed lies and mistruths, but in reality you are showing everyone you worship me and what I say. Stop it. Please, get help. You need to get better, and by making up false claims and telling everyone GL thinks he knows the future, when even I know that to be false. Giving educated guesses is better than staying silent. If you are so bent on trying to compare my opinions to absolute LIES, then you have some mental problems. Guessing what will happen is not a bad thing, and I have never stated I had any inside information. Saying what may happen without inside information equals guessing. You know that, right little buddy? Are you ok now? Get a hanky and wipe your nose please.


Bye Bye--General Lee
Deflect, Deny, and Counter-Acuse, Insult.
 
Last edited:
Bloviate?

WhatRUSmokinGL? said:
6792 post. Look in the mirror about obsessions.

Just here to point out your BLOVIATION.

For anyone else who wants to know what "Bloviation" means - I looked it up because I don't have anything better to do this afternoon.

Bloviate - to orate verbosely and windily.

The problem with using "bloviate" is that it includes the word "orate" - which means to deliver an oration - and an "oration" implies treating an important subject in a formal and dignified manner. Not much in this thread is dignified with all the childish banter.

Now that I've spent too much time in the dictionary - I'm going for a run.
 
Lolikoka said:
For anyone else who wants to know what "Bloviation" means - I looked it up because I don't have anything better to do this afternoon.

Bloviate - to orate verbosely and windily.

The problem with using "bloviate" is that it includes the word "orate" - which means to deliver an oration - and an "oration" implies treating an important subject in a formal and dignified manner. Not much in this thread is dignified with all the childish banter.

Now that I've spent too much time in the dictionary - I'm going for a run.
[SIZE=-1]"to speak or write overexpansively or with undue grandiosity."

That was the definition I was using.

I'll take your counsel under advisement.
[/SIZE]
 
Last edited:
Take this under advisement also:

You have used the word "denie" at least 4 times. Are you looking for the word "deny" or are you trying to be clever in some way that is not immediately obvious to me?
 
General Lee said:
I was told it was too large (I have heard that before---sorry) for the screen, so I had to take it down. I liked it too.

As far as having the contract thrown out, that would again ultimately result in a strike and shutdown. That won't happen. I think if it is voted down more negotiations would take place. Look at the judge at the Comair Flt Attendant 1113c. He didn't give any ruling at all.

As far as the additional pay cuts, there are none. We get the same pay cut we have now, because that was a temporary agreement. So, we do not get another pay cut from what we have now, and we would get a small 1.5% raise in Jan 07.(jan 08 will give another 1.5% raise, and up to an extra 6% if we hit performance criteria---and we also get 15% of any pretax income as a bonus along with other employees) As far as the pension goes, we all knew it would go away, since they haven't funded it in over 6 months. If any pilot was over 50 or especially over 53, they should have retired and taken the money. Those who did not were dumb in my opinion. IF the DB plan does fail, which is expected, the rest of us will get a large chunk of change in our own IRAs that we chose, and could get more with BK claims we also have (we are creditors also, with $2.1 billion in additional claims that could net $400 million more). In addition, our DC programs will get a 9% monthly contribution (if you make $10,000 a month, then the company would give you $900 worth of matching each month) and they would then also add an additional 2% for 401K matching that was already agreed upon. So, there are some people that will lose out, but anyone over 50 had the chance to leave with more.

Overall, this TA is ok, except for not helping the furloughed pilots. I will vote NO and if they have to go back and fix that part, sobeit. That will cost them nothing, since scope was not included in the costing.


Bye Bye--General Lee

I agree with you General. They threw us furloughees out into the wind. I think the worst when it comes to DAL MGMT now. Next I see....relief on the RJ seat configuration...tied to getting ride of the 88s. That means 90-104 seats being flown by DCI at DCI rates. Mainline shrinks to widebodies and 73-800s.
 
flx757 said:
Take this under advisement also:

You have used the word "denie" at least 4 times. Are you looking for the word "deny" or are you trying to be clever in some way that is not immediately obvious to me?
Ok, I will do something that Arrogant people can not do.

I Was Wrong. I MISSPELLED A WORD.

See, flx757 I can admit when I was wrong about something (spelling). Or is that you GL? Did you sign on under a different name.......
 
No, it's not the General. It's me. Simple Alaska guy. I just thought I might be missing something clever and was kicking myself that I couldn't figure it out.

Carry on with "debate".:D
 
General Lee said:
What do you mean? If this TA passes, our pay will go up a minimum of 4.5% in the next 3 years, with a potential of an extra 13.5% if the airline does well. Plus, we will get 15% of any pre-tax income for the year as a bonus, along with the other employees.

So, with a minimum INCREASE of 4.5%, how are we contributing to that? The regionals are declining or will be declining at a much larger rate in the future, trying to chase new feed.

Bye Bye--General Lee

How long do you think it will take management to go to the BK court and ask permission to throw these clauses out? My guess is 4-6 months. Mind you, this is all from a team that came up with "Delta After Dark" where the employees take time away from their families to work for FREE. Tell me how great this contract is in 6 mos. Just keep in mind your friends at ATA who, in the course of 1 and a Half years agreed to FOUR pay concessions under the auspices of ALPA.

ALPA - Why fight for a Brighter Future when a Dimmer One is Easier to Reach?
 
General Lee said:
What pay cut? We had a temporary pay cut last December, and that will now hold. So, no additional pay cuts. Plus, there is a clause in the TA that does NOT allow bonuses to management for our pay cuts. Did you read the TA? I don't think so. You need to. Besides the scope issue, it really isn't bad. Helping our current furloughs is the only area that needs work. Get informed before you post.

Bye Bye--General Lee

Shareholders and creditors go wild when costs are reduced (your salary being a cost) and stock goes up. Shareholders profit. But management only takes you pilots as "lowly" rank and file, barely educated enough to tie your shoes.
 
General Lee said:
That would be obsessive, but I have been on here for 5 years, and I actually respond to all criticism and rebutt posts. And, I really enjoy this board. You sound defensive.


Bye Bye--General Lee
No you don't, You still haven't touched the doubled standard of your desire to staple DALPA pilots on the top of the ASA/CMR lists when there was no preferential process or 'flow-through' process in place when times were good at DAL.

BTW
6800/5=1360 post per year
1360/365=3.7 posts per day for five years straight. hmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm


Yeah your right, no obsession there. Just baseless claim.

Of course you'll just Deflect, Deny, and Counter-Acuse, and then Insult to pull attention away from it right?
 
Last edited:
WhatRUSmokinGL? said:
Ok, I will do something that Arrogant people can not do.

I Was Wrong. I MISSPELLED A WORD.

See, flx757 I can admit when I was wrong about something (spelling). Or is that you GL? Did you sign on under a different name.......
Good lord is that the pot calling the kettle black. You call GL obsessive and ask if HE signed in under a different name - yet you created an entire screen name for the sole purpose of arguing with him!!?! and hide your other identity on this board?

God you need a life. Or counseling.
 
dtfl said:
Good lord is that the pot calling the kettle black. You call GL obsessive and ask if HE signed in under a different name - yet you created an entire screen name for the sole purpose of arguing with him!!?! and hide your other identity on this board?

God you need a life. Or counseling.

I didn't post until I saw his stance on a 'pop-up' flow back when his group was hurting.
I was a silent troller until then
 
dtfl said:
I agree with you General. They threw us furloughees out into the wind. I think the worst when it comes to DAL MGMT now. Next I see....relief on the RJ seat configuration...tied to getting ride of the 88s. That means 90-104 seats being flown by DCI at DCI rates. Mainline shrinks to widebodies and 73-800s.

Well, I think it is wrong what they are doing to you guys, and that is why I will vote no. I think they can clean up some of the TA and make it better, for no cost.

I actually think though that there will be recalls. We are short, and there will be some sort of an expansion plan, primarily to cover some of the 767s that will be going to INTL. Those DOM 767s will be covered by 757s, which will have to be replaced on certain routes by 738s, and then MD88s, etc. I don't think the 70 seater or even a 76 seater could cover for those planes, and it will be two full years until they could get 30 of those, and they just have 6 extra seats. The TA did say that force mejeur could NOT be used, and the 1113c also can not be used again in this BK, unless DIP financing were in major jeopardy. The only way that will happen is if we have another 9-11, and that would affect every airline. I cannot see us EVER giving up on MD88s or any 100 seater we will get. They cannot change the 76 seater to 90 seats---again, no Force Mejeur can be allowed to do any of that. There is such a big gap between a 76 seater and the next smallest plane (after the 737-200 is gone)--the MD88, that there will be some 100 seater eventually found, and there is NO way DCI can take it or no way we would give up our MD88s etc. Could they pull another BK on us? Maybe, but doubtful. USAir did it twice, but they never had the fundamentals in place the first time, and I think we really would tank this place if it happened again soon.

So, I will vote no because of the way they are treating you, but I think eventually they will fix the TA and we will grow a bit more and you will come back. I think many will bypass recall, and if you are ready you will come back sooner than later. That is how I see it, and I will be at the ATL road show and make sure to ask the tough questions. This TA may still NOT pass (I hope so), and I think the company now sees we are serious, especially with our 95% vote authorization. No more relief will be given, again.

Bye Bye--General Lee
 
Last edited:
WhatRUSmokinGL? said:
I didn't post until I saw his stance on a 'pop-up' flow back when his group was hurting.
I was a silent troller until then

Pop up flowback? USAir did that with Mesa and PSA when they were in BK, and I am sure if some airline wanted more growth, they would accept the same. This isn't an idea that just popped into my head, it actually happened. So, you changed your name and became obsessed with trying to show that I lie.....Hmmmmm. Coookoo Coookoo. Thanks for reacting on every thing I print. That makes me feel special. Go to therapy.


Bye Bye--General Lee
 
General Lee said:
? USAir did that with Mesa and PSA


Bye Bye--General Lee

OH! then by all means it MUST be ok.

If anyone else can do it than I want to do it too. That removes the stigma of scum bag tactics on your part.
 
WhatRUSmokinGL? said:
OH! then by all means it MUST be ok.

If anyone else can do it than I want to do it too. That removes the stigma of scum bag tactics on your part.

Thanks again for the put down. Wow, you are good with those zingers. Anyway, as I was saying, we are the ones negotiating with DL, and if they want something, they will do it. We will do that for this TA, or the next contract, you can count on it. You would do the same if you were at CAL, but you cannot get off your tush and actually fill out an app, you are too busy trying to villify me. Get working, and it will change your mind.

Bye Bye--General Lee
 
General Lee said:
You are still obsessing. I am glad you THINK you are doing a great service by trying to expose my supposed lies and mistruths, but in reality you are showing everyone you worship me and what I say. Stop it. Please, get help. You need to get better, and by making up false claims and telling everyone GL thinks he knows the future, when even I know that to be false. Giving educated guesses is better than staying silent. If you are so bent on trying to compare my opinions to absolute LIES, then you have some mental problems. Guessing what will happen is not a bad thing, and I have never stated I had any inside information. Saying what may happen without inside information equals guessing. You know that, right little buddy? Are you ok now? Get a hanky and wipe your nose please.


Bye Bye--General Lee
This is refering to my last post when you came back at me with mom jokes and called me an a$$ clown.. Are you FREAKING SERIOUS, that is the best wit that you could come up with, mom jokes, a$$ clown, you have got to be a riot on the overnights. Do you bring the hand shake buzzer, the squirting flower, and the whoppi cushion. You're the guy who could never get laid in high school so you thought the pilot ticket and sailor suit would help you score.

Let give give you a little help on how to state an opinion, it goes something like this.
"well fellas, I'm not sure how this whole scope think in going to go. We are a young group, it's pretty important to us, I THINK 50.1% will vote it down. We will have to wait and see."

No if that was said we would all respect that and give you our take on the subject.

Instead you show up and say
" we have the votes, it will not pass" a couple hundred times.
that implies the statement to be fact, and you look like a clown when it doesn't happen.

however,this rule doesn't apply to me when I state
"GENERAL YOU ARE A CLOWN" because the majority knows it to be a fact.
 
Salty Pirate said:
This is refering to my last post when you came back at me with mom jokes and called me an a$$ clown.. Are you FREAKING SERIOUS, that is the best wit that you could come up with, mom jokes, a$$ clown, you have got to be a riot on the overnights. Do you bring the hand shake buzzer, the squirting flower, and the whoppi cushion. You're the guy who could never get laid in high school so you thought the pilot ticket and sailor suit would help you score.

Let give give you a little help on how to state an opinion, it goes something like this.
"well fellas, I'm not sure how this whole scope think in going to go. We are a young group, it's pretty important to us, I THINK 50.1% will vote it down. We will have to wait and see."

No if that was said we would all respect that and give you our take on the subject.

Instead you show up and say
" we have the votes, it will not pass" a couple hundred times.
that implies the statement to be fact, and you look like a clown when it doesn't happen.

however,this rule doesn't apply to me when I state
"GENERAL YOU ARE A CLOWN" because the majority knows it to be a fact.

Can you hear that? LISTEN. Hear it? That is my little golf clap for you. I have never claimed to be a negotiator, nor a chief pilot with the inside track. IF you believed what I said, then great. I always stated "we shall see" at the end of my posts, and that means "We will see what happens." Is there any certainty in that? Is there? You and whatareyousmokinGL are on the chronic. Get help. But, if you want to buy a bridge, I KNOW I can sell you one in Brooklyn. Do you believe me?


Bye Bye--General Lee
 
General Lee said:
Thanks again for the put down. Wow, you are good with those zingers. Anyway, as I was saying, we are the ones negotiating with DL, and if they want something, they will do it. We will do that for this TA, or the next contract, you can count on it. You would do the same if you were at CAL, but you cannot get off your tush and actually fill out an app, you are too busy trying to villify me. Get working, and it will change your mind.

Bye Bye--General Lee
Yeah and CAL/COEx - ExJet had an agreement PRIOR to th eflow back. So did AA and Eagle. They didn't do it only when it was convienent for them. Small details that you continually leave out that destroy your arguments.
I guess with you anything is OK if it benefits you. Amazing character. You must be a 'Boomer'.

BTW if bringing up the 'fine' points like the one above is 'villifying' you than maybe you should seek help.

But wait... I got it now!! You just don't want anyone confusing your fantasies with facts. Now I get you.

"The vote WILL fail and SCOPE is the ONLY thing." vs. I only said I 'THINK' after things change.


Deflect, Deny, and Counter-Acuse, and then Insult
 
Last edited:
WhatRU raises a good question. Why did the Delta MEC wait until they were in trouble to want some sort of flowback arrangement? I realize that they thought they were safe with the no-furlough thing, but would it have cost them so much to work out a flowthrough beforehand just in case? Never hurts to have a backup plan.
 
General Lee said:
TWe will do that for this TA, or the next contract, you can count on it.
Bye Bye--General Lee

Is this yet another famous GL Statement of fact?!

Can we all log this one and bring it back up when you are wrong again?

Or are you gonna say we are villifying you and that you only said you 'Think' it's gonna be in the next contract.
 
WhatRUSmokinGL? said:
Is this yet another famous GL Statement of fact?!

Can we all log this one and bring it back up when you are wrong again?

Or are you gonna say we are villifying you and that you only said you 'Think' it's gonna be in the next contract.

Your obsession with GL is becoming quite scary. Drink a beer, and relax for goodness sakes.....It'll be ok in the morning, I promise!
737
 
737 Pylt said:
Your obsession with GL is becoming quite scary. Drink a beer, and relax for goodness sakes.....It'll be ok in the morning, I promise!
737

Yeah! General watch out on your next layover. You might have someone roofi you and you wake up in some ghetto hostel with someone torturing you about scope.
 
Geez - Enough already.

I'm no fan of GL but enough is enough. Alright, the TA provides some scope relief - fine. GL was wrong - fine. GL has ragged on regional guys forever - fine, he get's the point now.

I'm an ASA guy and I've had some disputes with Gl, but it's time to put this behind us. If the TA passes, it passes. If it doesn't, it doesn't.

It's time to demonstrate a little professionalism out there. We want to be paid like professionals, let's act like them. All of this infighting only serves to support managements attempts to divide us.

OK - enough of my little rant. Please feel free to continue your rants and flame against me as well.
 
dtfl said:
Yeah! General watch out on your next layover. You might have someone roofi you and you wake up in some ghetto hostel with someone torturing you about scope.

Does he look like that "King" from Burger King? That would freak me out. He probably does, a big head and all.......


Bye Bye--General Lee
 
Does he look like that "King" from Burger King? That would freak me out. He probably does, a big head and all.......

Yeah, what the he!! were the ad folks thinking on that one?!? That dude creeps me out.

You know what you need General.....more cowbell.
 
737 Pylt said:
Before you and your rjdc gals start your "high fiving" and butt slaping, consider this. We don't even know it this will be approved by the membership. I for one won't be voting yes to this POS!
BTW I'm still waiting for your response about using the ALPA forum for rjdc efforts?
Secondly, we know why your lawsuit started.. The rjdc is filled with the "undesireables" of aviation. No college degree, some dui's. SO get your facts straight! Your idea of one list was "DOH" and didn't fly, so ram it!
737

Oh great, another elitist snob banging his 4 yr degree drum again. You Sir can take your attitude and "ram it"!



Sitting here with my H.S. diploma and twice the maturity.......
 
Exskydiverdrivr said:
Oh great, another elitist snob banging his 4 yr degree drum again. You Sir can take your attitude and "ram it"!



Sitting here with my H.S. diploma and twice the maturity.......
Funny how people find the weirdest things to use as justification to look down their nose at others.

Funny how most of it comes from other forums to this one.

Of course they are here 'Just for educational purposes'. They aren't here to incite people. Nope, only the most pure of intentions. And don't any of you question them. They are superior to you! Just ask them.
 
Last edited:

Latest resources

Back
Top Bottom