Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Friendliest aviation Ccmmunity on the web
  • Modern site for PC's, Phones, Tablets - no 3rd party apps required
  • Ask questions, help others, promote aviation
  • Share the passion for aviation
  • Invite everyone to Flightinfo.com and let's have fun

Delta RFP - will Delta pay for the gas?

Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Modern secure site, no 3rd party apps required
  • Invite your friends
  • Share the passion of aviation
  • Friendliest aviation community on the web
General Lee said:
Paying for the fuel difference is ridiculous.

When I talked about Lawson, I was just remembering how he was sooo greedy asking for extra 70 seaters when our furloughed pilots were out of luck. A lot of us will never forget that, and I wasn't even furloughed.

Bye Bye--General Lee
General: Guess what - Delta pays for all the gas, not just a portion of it, not just a "difference." Delta negotiates a rate and if it says "Delta" on the side of the airplane that is the rate it goes in at, plus a small fee for the folks pumping the gas.

But if contracts are re-written so that SkyWest negotiates their own fuel contracts, then Delta will still buy all the gas because the price will be figured into the revised contract.

You apparently don't understand what Regional Airlines are these days - we are basically aircraft leasing companies. Usually leasing companies don't buy fuel - it is a pass through because the customer gets a better deal that way.

Delta makes these contracts, they are the 900lb gorilla. You think measley ASA holds them up when there is a glut of 50 seat RJ's on the market? - hardly. We make money the old fashioned way, by paying slave wages, spending nearly nothing on service and delivering about 1/3 of what we promise. Delta's passengers surely suffer, but Delta calls the shots and it seems they like the lowest bidder.

As for Lawson, you give the man mythical powers. First, Delta Management decided where and what they were going to outsource. (Now here is the news flash) ** ALPA then adjusted its scope policy to meet Management's plans ** and you see the result.

Lawson did the right thing by trying to establish a dialogue with the Delta MEC instead of a cram down. Lawson wanted to talk about brand scope - wich we obviously need and your MEC Chairman refused.

As the RJDC litigation continues we are learning why your MEC Chairman refused. Could it be that ALPA and Delta Management were working in partnership on scope changes and that ALPA National provided the Delta pilots with economic analysis of the benefits Delta would recieve as a result of concessionary bargaining at Connection, which was used as bargaining capital?

It isn't that the DCI pilots are responsible for your concessions, but the documentation from the RJDC lawsuit certainly indicates ALPA, on the behalf of the Delta pilots, has an active role in DCI concessions.

And isn't this what we sort of suspected anyway? With every concession Delta would announce its intentions, the Delta MEC would go nuts and threaten to shut the place down, then the final result would be pretty much whatever Delta wanted?

I'm telling you - ALPA really boned up this deal and they continue down the wrong road purely out of mainline arrogrance. We are all getting screwed by this alpa apartied system.

At least you and I agree on one thing! We both would like to see the RJ's go to Delta mainline. Me, just so I can see you guys fly them at rates which are below ASA, Chautauqua, Republic, Air Wisconsin, Shuttle America or Horizon (and if I failed to mention SkyWest it is because I don't fully comprehend how they make $15 less than me an hour but take home $40,000 more a year with profit sharing - but when I figure it out they will also have rates over what your MEC secured on "our" equipment.)

But it brings us back to the point - your MEC negotiated these rates on phantom airplanes to try to help management reduce costs at Connection. Thanks, ALPA. We must have offset enough of your concessions, because you voted for it.

~~~^~~~
 
Last edited:
Question, does ASA or any other conection carrier have anything that the Delta pilots didn't give us? I mean its not like we went to Delta and said hey we can do this route cheaper than mainline, however that is exactly what is happening right now at the regionals and all ALPA can concern themselves with is mainline problems. Don't be an Indian giver Delta pilots, if you willingly give up scope then accept your fate like a man and quit bitching about it. As for the freedumb, skywest, and ********************taco folks you all better step it up in contract negotiations or you will continue to be looked upon as the trash you seem to be.
 
One contract doesn't fit all...

~~~^~~~ said:
You apparently don't understand what Regional Airlines are these days - we are basically aircraft leasing companies. Usually leasing companies don't buy fuel - it is a pass through because the customer gets a better deal that way.
~~~^~~~
Don't assume all contracts and regionals are the same. The biggest problem pilots have is a lack of knowledge in business and about what is going on at companies outside of their own. It will continue to be our downfall if we don't educate ourselves and stop yelling at each other comparing two things which in reality are not the same.

For example, most of Colgan's contracts (if not all) are not structured this way. Colgan pays all expenses, from Fuel to baggage delivery (despite the fact that they have no control over misconnecting bags). This makes the liability to the mainline carrier practically nil. The flipside to this agreement is that Colgan sets the fares and the schedules. No one tells them when to fly or for how much. They add and remove flights as they see fit and adjust the prices as well. If they know what they're doing (and they do) then they maximize their profit without leaching off the mainline carrier or losing out on strong revenue.

I don't know if this would work with all regionals, but it is another form of contract that is proven and continues to work.
 
Salty Pirate said:
737 take a break, the general doesn't need hummers from you every day. There is only one thing worse than being the general, it's being his little playground bitch that stands behind him talking smack.
That's pretty funny....Now if only your mom will remove herself from the bent over position on the basketball court, the pro team can get back to practicing for the upcoming season!
737
 
miles otoole said:
Hey LEEna,
It's not too late to come on over to WN. You can use your next vacation to get your 737 type, unless you got one during your time serving your country. In 2 years when DL finally goes tits up, you'll be glad you did. You can thank Plato for your career mistake.
hey miles, how many knee pads did you go through to pay off that 737 type? I hear your mom is still paying off your braces through "favors" done during football camp!
737
 
Well, leave the poor General alone. With the TA he said would never pass passing, he's enjoying a full schedule due to the productivity increases. And the pay cut caused him to put his Redneck Humvee up for sale, take out a second mortgage on his Redneck Mansion in PTC, get a second job at Home Depot, and spend more time catering to his "hot wife" so she doesn't run off with some 250lb balding ASA pilot in the neighborhood who's making more money flying a CRJ-700.

All that doesn't leave much time for Flightinfo, so when he posts, he has to piss off as many people as possible to get the bang for his buck.
 
Salty Pirate said:
737 take a break, the general doesn't need hummers from you every day. There is only one thing worse than being the general, it's being his little playground bitch that stands behind him talking smack.

That's funny. I'm picturing a girl on the playground having a fight with another girl, and her entourage behind her yelling insults at the other girl, and repreating everything she says and snapping. That's 737pylt. We should start caling him Shaniqua.
 
John Pennekamp said:
That's funny. I'm picturing a girl on the playground having a fight with another girl, and her entourage behind her yelling insults at the other girl, and repreating everything she says and snapping. That's 737pylt. We should start caling him Shaniqua.
Oh boy another one....I guess YOU of all people know why they call him salty pirate huh?? Shouldn't you be busy shopping for mouthwash?!
737
 
737 Pylt said:
Oh boy another one....I guess YOU of all people know why they call him salty pirate huh?? Shouldn't you be busy shopping for mouthwash?!
737

Yeah, I do need to, 'cause the flippin' TSA took mine away. Hey, I'll say hi to ya when you greet me on my way into Walmart this afternoon.
 
John Pennekamp said:
Yeah, I do need to, 'cause the flippin' TSA took mine away. Hey, I'll say hi to ya when you greet me on my way into Walmart this afternoon.
And the next time you don't hand me my shopping cart and and say "welcome to Walmart," I'm getting your ass fired!
737
 
737 Pylt said:
And the next time you don't hand me my shopping cart and and say "welcome to Walmart," I'm getting your ass fired!
737

Sorry, I already beat you to the Walmart insult. You're not even very creative are you? Were you beaten as a child?
 
the way it was explained to us in recurrent recently at skywest:

Delta has a predetermined amount they give us for fuel. I don't know if it's per leg, per month, per quarter? someone else here might. if we go over that, it's a cost to us. if we come in under, it is a surplus for us. I believe these amounts are constantly analyzed and adjusted.

for United, it is a pass through that is audited and then paid. I'm sure there are myriad target amounts, projections, minimums, maximums, etc.
 
Wouldn't surprise me if Delta figured a way to ensure that any regional partner covered the fuel price risk going forward. Delta won't expose itself to that risk if it doesn't have to - and regional bottom dwellers like Mesa and CHQ will accept these terms to get the business. It's that simple.

Say adios to Skywest/ASA, Comair, etc. if they won't play by the new rules...........
 
johnsonrod said:
Say adios to Skywest/ASA, Comair, etc. if they won't play by the new rules...........

I was with you until this asinine statement. You're proving your ignorance, because the ASA/Skywest contract is not subject to the RFP. You're right, however that Comair is screwed.
 
General Lee said:
Thanks for flying slow and saving us money. But, I don't think DL management is impressed overall with your company. Your past strike cost $1 billion, and your FA obstinance is making them mad. Good luck.

By this assertion, Delta is making business decisions based on spite. That's a great way to run a company. The sad part is, I think you might be right.
 
johnsonrod said:
Wouldn't surprise me if Delta figured a way to ensure that any regional partner covered the fuel price risk going forward. Delta won't expose itself to that risk if it doesn't have to - and regional bottom dwellers like Mesa and CHQ will accept these terms to get the business. It's that simple.

Why would any regional agree to this? If the regional partner has no ability to raise ticket prices (increase revenue), why would they agree to cover fuel price risk (increased costs). This simply makes no sense. What advantage is it to Delta to set one of their suppliers up with a business model that will fail: fixed payments (no ability to raise revenue) with variable costs (the risk that fuel will go above whatever amount the agreement was predicated on)?

I don't really care if you mainline guys hate the DCI guys and vice versa, but let's be pragmatic here. Any supplier of anything, paper clips or lift, would be foolish to agree to a likely money-losing proposition.
 
No regional will cover gas prices as long as they have no way of curbing it. Not Mesa, not CHQ, no Comair, ASA, or Skywest. Like it has been said, it would be stupid to agree to pay for fuel when you don't control ticket prices. Delta will continue to pay for their gas because they want to sell cheap tickets. If they need more money then they just need to raise the price of their tickets. These days every other airline will follow suite a few days later so its good for all of us.
 
John Pennekamp said:
I was with you until this asinine statement. You're proving your ignorance, because the ASA/Skywest contract is not subject to the RFP. You're right, however that Comair is screwed.

Thanks professor! ASA/Skywest will get their's in due time during the next round of negotiations. The entire regional business is screwed in the long term - quit acting like a jacka$$...
 
johnsonrod said:
Thanks professor! ASA/Skywest will get their's in due time during the next round of negotiations. The entire regional business is screwed in the long term - quit acting like a jacka$$...


Yeah.... 15 years from now!
 
DrewBlows said:
By this assertion, Delta is making business decisions based on spite. That's a great way to run a company. The sad part is, I think you might be right.

I think they are sick and tired of Comair's krap. They know they can get feed for cheaper, and they are really taking it to everyone involved. SkyWest made a deal that keeps them away from that right now, but that won't always be the same in the future. SkyWest and ASA get a small reprieve for now, but lower costs will be asked of them too eventually. In the meantime, Comair may be in a world of hurt very soon.


Bye Bye--General Lee
 
General Lee said:
SkyWest and ASA get a small reprieve for now, but lower costs will be asked of them too eventually.

Bye Bye--General Lee
So General YES is back.

Nice to see you have no shame. Nice try but your NO/YES BS hasn't been forgotten. How has it felt to bend over and take it? Are you as loud in the crew room about your NO-NO-NO-NO... ok give it to me.... YES VOTE?
 
Last edited:
In Case anyone forgot the BS spewed by General YES.....

04-16-2006, 15:42 #11 General Lee Registered User

Join Date: Aug 2002
Posts: 7,054
Civ/Mil: Civilian
A/C Flown: EM2, 727FE, 738,757,767
Ratings: many
Curr Position: Flying
Total Time: A lot
Posts: 7,054


Our TA hasn't even been seen or voted on by our MEC members yet. It may get voted down by the MEC members, since most of them stated no RJs over 70 seats to DCI, period. They will be held accountable otherwise. Then it could go to the membership, and I doubt it would pass with that allowance. I won't vote for it.

Bye Bye--General Lee
__________________

 
WhatRUSmokinGL? said:
In Case anyone forgot the BS spewed by General YES.....

04-16-2006, 15:42 #11 General Lee Registered User

Join Date: Aug 2002
Posts: 7,054
Civ/Mil: Civilian
A/C Flown: EM2, 727FE, 738,757,767
Ratings: many
Curr Position: Flying
Total Time: A lot
Posts: 7,054


Our TA hasn't even been seen or voted on by our MEC members yet. It may get voted down by the MEC members, since most of them stated no RJs over 70 seats to DCI, period. They will be held accountable otherwise. Then it could go to the membership, and I doubt it would pass with that allowance. I won't vote for it.

Bye Bye--General Lee
__________________


All of that was BEFORE I saw the TA. I was uninformed prior to reading it, and I then chose to weigh the good and bad. It was then an INFORMED decision, and it was the correct one. Thanks for caring so much to mark my exact quotes in your head.


Bye Bye--General Lee
 
General Lee said:
All of that was BEFORE I saw the TA. I was uninformed prior to reading it, and I then chose to weigh the good and bad. It was then an INFORMED decision, and it was the correct one. Thanks for caring so much to mark my exact quotes in your head.


Bye Bye--General Lee
So I guess your are admitting your IGNORANCE. Well that is the first step.

PS Thanks for allowing the SCOPE to slip just a little bit more. What exactly is your limit? Sorry, that is an unfair question for a boomer. If it serves you than it must be ok, right? No limits, just self indulgence.

How often do you spout KRAP? Are you still just on here spouting more IGNORANT KRAP to flame bait?

What was the purpose of the latest thread you started? To inform?

YES!
 
Last edited:
WhatRUSmokinGL? said:
Our TA hasn't even been seen or voted on by our MEC members yet. It may get voted down by the MEC members, since most of them stated no RJs over 70 seats to DCI, period. They will be held accountable otherwise. Then it could go to the membership, and I doubt it would pass with that allowance. I won't vote for it.

__________________


And your point is? Didn't the quote start with the premise that the TA hadn't even been seen by the MEC yet, let alone the rank and file?

For the record, I voted no, but I don't begrudge anyone who voted yes. It's our PWA, we'll live with it. It's not the best, but it's far from the worst.
 
Last edited:

Latest resources

Back
Top Bottom