regionaltard
seat lock
- Joined
- May 22, 2005
- Posts
- 951
~~~^~~~ said:This guy is exactly right. Any of the Delta pilots beginning to realize it yet?
I know of at least one who definitely hasn't........
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
~~~^~~~ said:This guy is exactly right. Any of the Delta pilots beginning to realize it yet?
~~~^~~~ said:FDJ2:
You often repeat this quote and try to tell everyone it means something other than what its says. Has your own zeal blinded you?UOTE]
Earth to Fins, the quote is very easy to understand, according to the RJDC and its lawsuit, no pilot group has the right to control its code, only its aircraft. You see Fins, you support a lawsuit that is aimed at eliminating scope protections and allowing airlines to outsource more and more of their code to low bidders. You need to educate yourself.
~~~^~~~ said:If the Delta pilots want to contract for all Delta flying - GREATThe problem is that the Delta pilots only want to perform some of Delta's flying while outsourcing the flying they deem as being beneath them. The RJDC believes, as do I, that once the Delta pilots sell their scope, it no longer belongs to them.
skykid said:My fear for Delta is they are going to get just enough relief (sale of regional, sale of aircraft, pension payment timeframe extended) that they are going to limp through the deadline for Ch11 under the old rules.
michael707767 said:so you think we have the right to scope, but only if we have scope for all flying?? Good luck in your future negotiations, cause I don't think there are any pilot groups with enough leverage to have scope coverging all flying. So according to you, non of us can have any scope.
FDJ2 said:The RJDC does not believe that any pilot group can own its code, an airline's code, according to the RJDC, can only be controlled by the airline, not the pilot group. According to the RJDC, contract language that limits an airlines ability to outsource is illegal.
michael707767 said:read again what YOU just wrote. Your MECs were denied a seat when MAINLINE scope was being negotiated. Why should you be at the table when mainline scope is negotiated?
michael707767 said:Know what, there are right. Delta does own the code. And Delta chose to sign a contract with the Delta pilots giving them rights to a large portion of that code. They did not have to do that. But they did. Deal with it.
JoeMerchant said:There lies the rub Michael. Get out your contract and look at it. Delta signed an agreement with ALPA, not the "Delta pilots". The RJDC lawsuit is against ALPA, not the "Delta pilots". See the difference?
JoeMerchant said:Because it affects me. It's a very simple concept Michael. ALPA represents BOTH of us, therefor when it goes to the table, it has to represent me too. While DALPA may make the decisions, legally only ALPA exists.
michael707767 said:Actually it says "between the airline pilots in the service of Delta Inc, as represented by the Air Line Pilots Association."
Represented by does not mean controlled by. ALPA works for us, not the other way around.
michael707767 said:Thats not true. ALPA represents us, just like a lawyer. My lawyer does not tell me what do to or what to negotiate. He works for me. I tell him what I want and what to negotiate for. Same for ALPA.
michael707767 said:If being represented by ALPA limits what I can do and or negotiate for, then what possible reason would I, or you, have for being in ALPA? Oh, and did you invite the Delta pilots or the ASA pilots to the table when you were negotiating your last contract? Didn't think so.
michael707767 said:PS. I know you disagree. Hence the lawsuit. My bet is that I will be proven right. And if not, I will respect the decision of the court. Then I will demand my pilot group leave ALPA. I won't let my pilot group be harmed by membership in a national union. If you think ALPA is not right for you, why have you stayed?
JoeMerchant said:Actually I agree somewhat. The analogy I like to use is having the husband and wife use the same lawyer in a divorce. Definite conflict of interest.
I guess you assumed I was a CMR pilot?
Because I actually believe in the concept of a truly NATIONAL UNION. ALPA hasn't lived up to that expectation however and thus the lawsuit. We would all be better off if we had a truly NATIONAL UNION.
michael707767 said:If it was legal and both parties knew about it before signing up to use that lawyer, I don' t you can complain afterward.