Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Friendliest aviation Ccmmunity on the web
  • Modern site for PC's, Phones, Tablets - no 3rd party apps required
  • Ask questions, help others, promote aviation
  • Share the passion for aviation
  • Invite everyone to Flightinfo.com and let's have fun

Delta realignment

Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Modern secure site, no 3rd party apps required
  • Invite your friends
  • Share the passion of aviation
  • Friendliest aviation community on the web
N2264J said:
Try as you might to redirect the argument, your hypothetical misses the point. We were prevented by our own union from the opportunity to even attempt to protect ourselves from the serious hole in the mainline scope clause concerning "permitted aircraft." We were locked out. It's had the effect of driving this flying off the property and inducing a horrible whipsaw problem, courtesy of ALPA.

Could you have "bought" scope against other regionals? Maybe. But, you went for the money.


Bye Bye--General Lee
 
General Lee said:
And, Dalpa will fight for any 100 seaters if they ever do come up. USAir---the AWA side, is currently fighting against those 100 seaters at CHQ, since they know it is ridiculous. Too bad you do not.

Bye Bye--General Lee

And if they're willing to fly them for the third-world wages and bennies that are the byproduct of their tragic misunderstanding of Scope they will.....as long as someone doesn't underbid them. Welcome to the world you created......
 
Then he stated something about 737-700s flying to many new South American routes.

Curious what these would be. Besides the major capital cities of South America, the other cities (Cali, Medellin, Chihuahua, etc) are flown by American or Continental themselves (non-codeshare) or their regional partners.

CAL prob has the most Mexico coverage and AA the most South America coverage

Wonder what "new market" Delta is going to tap into.
 
N2264J said:
Try as you might to redirect the argument, your hypothetical misses the point. We were prevented by our own union from the opportunity to even attempt to protect ourselves from the serious hole in the mainline scope clause concerning "permitted aircraft." We were locked out.

so you say. My sources say otherwise.
 
79%N1 said:
Maybe even for E190 products. DAL cannot afford to buy these airplanes, and DALPA WILL NOT be competitive for what these other companies can fly for. Remember, overall costs are the factor, not just crew pay. Managers, dispatchers, cleaners, rampers and mechanics all cost more at DAL than CHQ or SKW! IMHO


first of all, you are right. Pilot costs are not the only issue. However, I do believe the Delta pilots will have no choice but to become competitive in our positions. But managers, dispatchers, cleaners, etc don't have to cost less than or equal too CHQ. They just have to be competitive with Airtran and JetBlue. If they cost more than those airlines, they are overpaid. We are all headed to a similar cost structure. The sooner everyone, from pilots to rampers, realize that, the better. Second, Delta will have to replace aircraft. Its like fuel really. Its one of our "raw" materials. You can't build cars without steel. You can't move furniture without trucks. And you can't fly passengers without airplanes. At some point you have to have aircraft to operate an airline. You can't make money if all you do is code share. Once Delta gets its overall cost structure in line, financing will become available. Plus, I suspect if Boeing is not willing to wheel and deal with Delta for new aircraft, Airbus will be willing. Or even Embraer. But Delta will get new aircraft.
 
General Lee said:
Could Air Canada afford the 35 777s and 20 787's they announced just outside of Canadian Chap 11? They were days from liquidation.

Bye Bye--General Lee

Not really a comparable situation as Air Canada has a near monopoly and the Canadian gov't would never have allowed them to liquidate.

But for more accurate comparisons...take a look at UAL and USAirways. Do you see them buying up lots of new planes? No. They've deferred deliveries for many, many years into the future. Even healthier carriers like AA aren't buying up planes. AA will take delivery of 2 777's and then nothing until 2010.

If AA can't afford planes for that long, what makes you think DL (a far weaker airline) can?

DL's credit rating is so poor that attractive financing just isn't going to happen. And a CH11 filing won't help the matter...DL will be viewed as a deadbeat. Why should Boeing cut a deal with DL for new 737's when more stable carriers like Airtran and Southwest are buying them up rapidly?
 
This is my first post here after lurking for six months or so. I've just got a plea from those of us on the slower side. All the acronyms that everyone is so fond of using here makes the threads really hard to follow. Some posts seem to have more acronyms than actual english words. Examples are DL, DAL, CAL, CMR, LCC, INTL, ML, JB, COEX, DCI, CVG, XJT, RJDC. I can figure out about half of them, but they still make it very hard to read a thread with any kind of comprehension. Equally bad is the abbreviating of aircraft types like 738. It took me about two months to figure out that this meant 737-800.

I'm a product of the mississippi educational system, and a Marine, so God knows I'm not qualified to give any english lessons. I'm just asking folks to take the extra second to type out the names so we dumbasses can follow.

Thanks
 
Once again MedFlyer is right on the money with this topic. Delta isn't going to be buying any aircraft anytime soon and has little in common with Air C.

NWA and Delta ARE going to shrink their domestic operation, either in Ch11 or not. Delta will have to do it out of ATL, and it will be a double digit percentage loss of seats. I doubt Delta is going to do this outside of Ch11.

I see two possible lines of thinking at Delta. Either their mgt figures they aren't going to survive a trip to bankruptcy, so they are going to fight tooth and nail to stay out, or they will go Ch11 in the next 6 weeks before the rules change.

Here's hoping the price of jet fuel takes I dive and I'm wrong!
 
MetroSheriff said:
Uh oh, someone is on his rant again.

JB is that you????

No, but JB does have some valid points. He tells it like it is, not necessarily the way ALPA wants to tell it. I like people who question authority - BOTH sides! Rumor has it some of the ASA MEC members are dissapointed with the recent elections over at DALPA. One of the status reps said "that DALPA is going back to the way it was". Is that really a surprise to you guys? Didn't JB warn you?

Joe
 
Last edited:

Latest resources

Back
Top