Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Friendliest aviation Ccmmunity on the web
  • Modern site for PC's, Phones, Tablets - no 3rd party apps required
  • Ask questions, help others, promote aviation
  • Share the passion for aviation
  • Invite everyone to Flightinfo.com and let's have fun

Delta guys please explain

Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Modern secure site, no 3rd party apps required
  • Invite your friends
  • Share the passion of aviation
  • Friendliest aviation community on the web
jarhead said:
No! Don't apply! Buy a franchise and OWN it. That's the little secret of capitolism.:) :)
They are very selective about who they sell franchises to - - exhibit the lack of business sense that some of these folks do and they wouldn't sell you the McDonald's name for quadruple the going rate. They actually have pride in what they do - - and I doubt they'd even dream of PFT.
 
I'm all for you guys CHOKING the GOLDEN GOOSE as much as you can. Just please don't squeeze that neck too hard. You might just KILL IT!

A lot of people's lives depend on Delta's future.

Jet
 
Definition?

Seriously, folks... if all the Delta pilots decided tomorrow to work for free, the dent in operating costs would be negligible.

This depends on your definition of negligible. With everything GG is asking for (30% plus some work rules) , the total is around 800-900 million per year. With a 300 mil loss per quarter, this would equate to around 300 mil per year loss at present operational costs. That is quite a substancial change in operating revinue.

The General also stated and agreed to by many other mainline guys on this board that others beside mainline need to take cuts. Well, the Gen would be shocked that I fully aggree with him on this one. Since all of the other labor groups in the Delta family are at industry average or just above industry average, we should ALL take a pay cut to be 5% below industry average. The Gen is correct in that he wants all employees to pay, so all emolyees get to pay. That should also help out Delta. Every single one of us will get industry average less 5%. Since industry average would be over 67% of DALPA's pay, that would more than put Delta into the Black. So what do you guys think? Fair is fair, right? I mean surely DALPA does not want to see all of the rest of the emloyees below industry average while they stay well above industry average, would they?:eek:
 
TonyC

Your comments remind me very much of the arrogant UAL guys that I used to argue with 2001-2002.

I'm sure you can go back and find quotes from them that would match your quotes almost word for word..."if we all worked for free, the company still wouldn't make money."

They all sat around with witty remarks and entrusted their ALPA MEC to fix their problems.

What they got was a management imposed contract while their company went into bankruptcy, with worse work rules than I have at Comair.

(By the way...I didn't make up those numbers about annual average pilot salaries at DAL...those numbers came out of Air Inc documentation.)

Also, I never said the only part of the solution was pilot salary cuts. As I said above, it would have to be coupled with parking unprofitable planes, and buying new planes with lower operating costs, as well as more efficient utilization of aircraft (the average turn at Comair is 20-30 minutes, even for our RJ70...it's a heck of a lot quicker to turn an RJ70/90 than it is an MD80 or a 737-200.)

If my proposals for all DAL/DCI pilots to take pay cuts, buy more profitable planes, get the DAL guys off the street, and park gas hog money losing planes is not a viable plan...

What is your plan to save DAL?
 
Last edited:
goldentrout said:
TonyC

Your comments remind me very much of the arrogant UAL guys that I used to argue with 2001-2002.
And your comments remind me of someone who is envious of others who make more money than you, and you have a plan to even things out for yourself. Your envy of senior pilots and their pensions is blatantly obvious. It will be interesting to see how your tune changes in 30 years.

(You still haven't addressed any Operating Cost figures, and the pilots' salaries as a percentage of those costs.)

goldentrout said:
What is your plan to save DAL?
Refer to article posted above by jarhead
The pilots' union has countered with a proposal that calls for a 9 percent wage cut in addition to holding back the impending raises; an offer the union says could help Delta restructure its debt.

Union officials have said that they continue to be open for further negotiations. But they characterize the company's offer as being presented as "take it or leave it," which they say is unacceptable.
"In our analysis, the magnitude of the demand is not justified by the data we have been given," said union spokesman Chris Renkel. "We do acknowledge that our plan addresses the debt, which seems to be the $20 billion elephant no one seems to want to talk about."

Still, "we're just a phone call away." Renkel said.
 
I think with world events the way they are, the economy the way it is, rising fuel costs and expansion at the regionals...this industry analyst's prediction could come to fruition. Even if it doesn't, I don't see the legacy carriers welcoming regional pilots with open arms and open legs, when they eventually do hire again.

I also thought it was interesting that American Pilots sued and got a setlement from American for the lost wages they suffered as a result of regional flying taking away jobs at American. So in the end, it cost American Airlines mainline wages to operate regionals when you consider the settlement of the suit.

Rough skies for big airlines

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
By Alexander Coolidge
Post staff reporter

The air travel rebound that the industry has been praying for is on its way, but it will leave traditional airlines behind with diminished market share as healthier, low-cost rivals take off, a new government report predicts.
Airline passenger demand will return to pre-Sept. 11 levels in 2005, but regional carriers such as Cincinnati-based Comair Inc. and low-cost carriers such as Southwest Airlines, JetBlue and AirTran will be the beneficiaries, the Federal Aviation Administration report says.

Major carriers like Greater Cincinnati's dominant airline, Delta, have seen their collective market share slip from 83 percent of traffic to less than 77 percent, said the report. The agency predicts old-line "legacy" carriers such as Delta will see that share shrink to less than half the total domestic market by 2015.

"That's hardly a surprise," said Glenn Engel, an analyst with Goldman Sachs & Co. in New York. "It's still a very tough business."

Traffic at Cincinnati/Northern Kentucky International Airport, which is dominated by Delta and its subsidiary Comair, should continue to benefit from Delta's shifting more flights to Comair, said Ted Bushelman, airport spokesman. Delta reported earlier this year that, while its overall traffic shrank 3.3 percent in 2003, Comair saw a 40 percent increase in the same period.

"Delta does very well in Cincinnati with Comair," he said.

Bushelman said traffic at the airport was growing and that local officials were pursuing plans for eventual expansion.

Engel said major carriers have trapped themselves in a vicious cycle of flying fewer planes to save money. Cutting capacity brings in less money and spreads more costs over fewer active planes. It also invites low-cost competitors to expand into the majors' markets.

"Nobody's ever shrunk their way to profitability," he said.

The report came out as Southwest Airlines said it was stepping up its expansion into Philadelphia -- a highly aggressive move against US Airways, which maintains a hub there. The move prompted US Airways chief executive David Siegel to tell employees the discount carrier was "coming to kill us."

Since the end of 2000, legacy carriers have seen traffic drop nearly 15 percent, while low-cost carriers have seen traffic rise by more than 28 percent

Publication Date: 03-30-2004
 
===========
Mullin will complete his departure this week when he turns over his seat as chairman to Delta board member and former General Motors CEO John F. Smith at Thursday's annual meeting.
In addition to Mullin, former president and chief operating officer Fred Reid left last month to help start a new airline.
And on Thursday, Delta's remaining highest-ranked officer under Grinstein departed. Executive vice president and chief operating officer M. Michele Burns said she was resigning to take a similar job at another Atlanta company
============

Didn't Delta mgmt increase the funding to their pension plan to prevent this from happening?

This came out the day after the pilots signed their latest contract.

Was it a lie that the pension funding would prevent senior mgmt from leaving? Or did the rescind the additional pension funding.
 
MBB wrote:
AA took the paycuts and they're still losing money....
MBB,

You're a genius! AA isn't any longer talking about bankruptcy and the possibility of Chapter 11 and eventual Chapter 7 are they?!

You can't compare AA with Delta anymore.


Tony C wrote:
And your comments remind me of someone who is envious of others who make more money than you, and you have a plan to even things out for yourself. Your envy of senior pilots and their pensions is blatantly obvious. It will be interesting to see how your tune changes in 30 years.

This is amazing. Wow. We don't care what you make!!! We hope you make a lot of money!! As a pilot we want the profession to have high wages!! It's the people that don't have a stake in the future of "DELTA" that say "HOLD THE LINE GUYS".
"DON'T LET THEM TAKE YOUR MONEY", etc. They don't care if Delta goes tits up!!! It helps many of them if Delta goes out of business!! Their airline will grow to take up some of the slack.

It's people like me that have a stake in DELTA that are going to be telling you to get things under control soon.

WE BLAME THE MANAGEMENT AND DELTA PILOTS EQUALLY!!!

Being an employee of Delta, that sees the pilot salaries way out of whack at an AIRLINE LOSING A LOT OF MONEY, I and others in my position want things to become manageable like AA soon, so we don't LOSE OUR JOBS. We don't care how much you make, but when it's going to make us lose our jobs, we want the pay to atleast come back to EARTH.

DELTA has way entirely too much debt and it's losing money hands over fist QUICKLY! This can't continue.


I wouldn't blame Grinstein for taking the company into Chapter 11 as quickly as possible. I think the shareholders would not sue! They would know that Grinstein was doing what was best for the share price two to three years from now!

The way things are going, Chapter 11 looks like it's inevitable at Delta.

Let's hope it doesn't get worse than that.

I do think all of the employees should give up some pay and everyone could come back to just above industry average. I also think Grinstein is going to take away some of the other non-union employees pay. I think he'll cut their pay back ONLY AFTER he gets pay cuts from the pilots. That's my opinion.



TONY C you need to stop thinking everyone is jealous of your pay. We're proud of you bud! Nice job! Bravo! Just don't take away our pay in the process.

Jet
 
Last edited:
Yah, I Do.

Posted by Vortilon "...Do you really think your are worth a piddly $40k per year to fly passenger jets? Managers at McDonalds make more than that..."

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
What more needs to be said? I guess market dynamics, competition, efficiencies, and supply/demand principles have nothing to do with it. I'm worth what I'm worth!

What would happen to the McDonald's or Home Depot or Terminix Manager who said that?

But aye darn, I'm worth XXX and that's what I demand to be paid!!! Not a cent less, you hear? (and it's not just for me, it's for the unwashed masses that will come after me).

But what about the guy who will do your job for half of what you're asking? Hope is not a method and he isn't going away. He will always be there and in the end will factor strongly into what you end up making. Right? Skill is a commodity to be sold on the open market. It is not a freakin' birthright.

The emperor has no clothes. But he doesn't know it yet.
 
jetflyer said:
TONY C you need to stop thinking everyone is jealous of your pay. We're proud of you bud! Nice job! Bravo! Just don't take away our pay in the process.

Jet
In the first place, I didn't say everyone... my remark was directed at goldentrout who seems to think the salvation of "his" airline lies in mainline pilots giving up 30% of their wages.

Second, I didn't say MY pay. I work for FedEx - - a far cry from Delta wages.

Anybody know what the Delta pilot wages are as a percentage of Total Operating Costs?? Anyone??
 
DMEC Chairman Speaks

EQUAL TIME: Delta's pilots always ready to do fair share
John J. Malone - For the Journal-Constitution
Monday, April 19, 2004

A few short years ago, Delta Air Lines was earning record profits amid a booming economy. Today, the airline is fighting for its survival and no one is more concerned than its employees, including the pilots. Unlike corporate executives who have taken their "retention" packages and moved on, the pilots are tied to this company.

Since Sept. 11, 2001, pilots have agreed to amend our contract many times to help Delta save money and compete. By waiving a portion of our contract, we allowed Delta to enter into a revenue-generating domestic code-share arrangement with Northwest and Continental. Another waiver permitted Delta to operate Song, an "airline within an airline." Thousands of U.S. troops were flown to war by Delta pilots after we amended our contract to make it easier for Delta to do this.

All of these concessions pale in comparison to the bailout package the pilots have been offering for almost a year. Our continual efforts to help over this period have been met with "all or nothing" demands from management. Regardless, we will continue to try to do our part to help the company.

Labor is just one part of the recovery equation. The pilots' union has offered hundreds of millions of dollars even though Delta has shown no evidence of a business plan that will enable it to compete effectively within the airline industry. Even those network carriers that have obtained worker concessions have yet to become profitable.

One only has to look at the losses incurred at United, American and U.S. Airways to see that labor alone cannot turn the tide. While it's easy to point to employee salaries, the "low hanging fruit," when a company is losing money, cutting labor costs alone is not the answer. An effective strategy must also include the elements that historically have set Delta apart from its competition, such as customer service and employee morale.

Much of the outcry over Delta's situation emanates from parties with absolutely no stake in the airline's recovery. We, the employees, have the most to lose should our airline not survive.

We didn't create the current situation, and only the most uninformed observer would conclude we can solve it by our givebacks alone.

We will continue to negotiate our participation in Delta's recovery as we always have --- in a businesslike manner, with the interests of the pilots, our fellow employees and our passengers foremost in mind.

John J. Malone, a Delta captain, chairs the airline's pilot union.

This column is solicited to provide another viewpoint to an AJC editorial published today. To respond to an AJC editorial, contact David Beasley at [email protected] or call 404-526-7371

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

What he said.

land_on_3
 
TonyC said:
In the first place, I didn't say everyone... my remark was directed at goldentrout who seems to think the salvation of "his" airline lies in mainline pilots giving up 30% of their wages.

Second, I didn't say MY pay. I work for FedEx - - a far cry from Delta wages.

Anybody know what the Delta pilot wages are as a percentage of Total Operating Costs?? Anyone??

Assuming an average pay per pilot of $150k/year, taking into account the 1000 pilots furloughed, the pilot payroll portion of the operating expenses is $901 million.

The total operating expenses of Delta is $13.3 billion. That would make the pilot payroll expenses 6.7% of the total operating expenses of the airline.

Now, if the pilots took a paycut of 20%, the new total pilot payroll expenses would be $720 million. A total savings each year of $181 million for the airline. That's about $45 million a quarter. In other words, it would barely dent the losses that Delta is taking.

Now, if the pilots decided to work for free, yes I said FREE, then Delta would save the total $901 million for the year. Delta is currently losing about $1.2 billion per year. That means that if the pilots worked for FREE, then delta would still be about $300 million in the red. That's right, if the pilots worked for nothing, then Delta would still not make money.

In other words Goldentrout, TonyC was right. Pilot pay cuts are not going to fix, or even significantly help the situation. Delta management needs to come up with some much better ideas quickly.

(most of the above information is available in the annual 10K report that Delta is required to make to the SEC. It is available on the Delta website.)
 
What about the pension costs for all the retired DAL pilots? How much of the operating expense does that come to? Anyone know? I've heard it is substantial, and growing.
 
TonyC, PCL-28

I know you guys can read because you've made it pretty far in the aviation business.

Why do you keep saying I want the DAL pilots to take a 30% pay cut? (Never said that). Also, I never said pay give backs were the total solution to the problem (Did you even read my first post that laid out my plan, with pilot pay cuts as a part of that plan?)

DAL would save millions a quarter by parking their gas hogs and putting new, smaller more cost efficient planes on many of their routes. An MD-80 with 90 people on board is a big money loser. An RJ90 with 90 people on board is a big money maker.

So you get 45-50 million a quarter from the pilots. A few work rule changes saves you another 10 million a quarter. You stop losing money on $300 737/MD-88 tickets and start making money on RJ70/90 $300 tickets. Maybe you save another 50-75 million a quarter. You add more smaller, money making aircraft into appropriate markets. You offer more flight frequency, building more market share. That gets you another 30 million in revenue a quarter. That puts you at an annual savings/additional revenue of around 500 million.

In ain't just about the pilot salaries...it's about a comprehensive plan, of which the pilot salaries must be a big part.

By the way...do you know why DAL management is putting out "all or nothing" deals...BECAUSE THEY HOLD ALL THE CARDS! A smart man knows when he can and can't bluff. DAL pilots have NOTHING to bluff with right now, and DAL management knows this! If I was DAL management, I would like nothing more than to have the pilots sit on their big fats wallets right into bankruptcy. Then I void all my union contracts, put together my own contracts, based on my competitors contracts (remember that contract...10 days off, no trip or duty rig, 50% deadhead pay), and impose my "take it or we'll find someone else to do your job" deal.

And that Vortilon guy...I and my family carry a DAL pass card in our pockets...just like you and your family. I wear black pants with Gold stripes and my wings say "Delta Connection." You wear black pants with gold stripes and your wings say "Delta." The revenue I generate goes into the DAL bank account, just like the revenue you generate.

Like it or not, we are on the same team. Without RJ feed, DAL would be Tango Uniform in very short order (what was the estimate...DAL lost $500,000,000 during the 89 day Comair strike?)

And to top it off...my suggestion was that DAL pilots can come in on top of me with their date of hire at DAL...I just want to get them off the street, because I don't like to see my "team" members suffer.

PCL-28, TonyC, Vortilon...you guys should go back to the archives and see these same conversations I had with the UAL guys around Dec 2001.

Same crap "it's mangement's fault...we could work for free and nothing would change...our MEC has things under control...it's not as bad as it seems...you don't understand how this business works because you haven't been around long enough."

OK...let's see, it's been about 28 months since my chat with the UAL guys...their company is now in bankruptcy, they took a 30% pay cut, their contract is gutted, they have little to no trip or duty rigs, they get 10 days off on reserve, they get 50% deadhead pay, they've got close to 2000 guys on furlough, etc...

I'll just check back in another 24 months or so and we'll see who was right...but for now the score is...

Goldentrout 1

Mainline MECs 0
 
goldentrout said:
TonyC, PCL-28

I know you guys can read because you've made it pretty far in the aviation business.

Why do you keep saying I want the DAL pilots to take a 30% pay cut? (Never said that).
You're right. Delta wants 30% - - take it or leave it. And enigma said 30%. But you said the salvation of Delta lies in a 20% pay cut and parking all the mainline gas-hogs. Since you wear "Delta pants," everyone ought to fly the same airplanes that you do, right?

goldentrout said:
In ain't just about the pilot salaries...it's about a comprehensive plan, of which the pilot salaries must be a big part.
AS I have said before, and has been recently demonstrated, pilot salaries are NOT a big part of the operating expenses, and will be but a minute part of any recovery plan.

goldentrout said:
By the way...do you know why DAL management is putting out "all or nothing" deals...BECAUSE THEY HOLD ALL THE CARDS! A smart man knows when he can and can't bluff. DAL pilots have NOTHING to bluff with right now, and DAL management knows this!
Let's see. If DAL management really thinks they're in trouble and bleeding too heavily, they'll ignore the Association's offer of an immediate pay cut followed by the the offer to forgo a 5% pay raise - - mind you it WILL go into effect if no action is taken - - just so they can wait for a 30% cut? I doubt it. If it's really all that bad, they take the immediate (effective) 15% cut and start working, negotiating for more. Apparently, they're content to let things ride as is.

goldentrout said:
If I was DAL management, I would like nothing more than to have the pilots sit on their big fats wallets right into bankruptcy. Then I void all my union contracts, put together my own contracts, based on my competitors contracts (remember that contract...10 days off, no trip or duty rig, 50% deadhead pay), and impose my "take it or we'll find someone else to do your job" deal.
So, if you were in management, you would put the corporation into bankruptcy so you could save the Company roughly 2.25% of its total operating expenses? I wonder what kind of golden parachute you'd be offered right before you were asked to resign.
goldentrout said:
...but for now the score is...

Goldentrout 1

Mainline MECs 0
You don't get to keep score until you start taking your meds.
 
goldentrout said:
TonyC, PCL-28

I know you guys can read because you've made it pretty far in the aviation business.

Why do you keep saying I want the DAL pilots to take a 30% pay cut? (Never said that). Also, I never said pay give backs were the total solution to the problem (Did you even read my first post that laid out my plan, with pilot pay cuts as a part of that plan?)


The problem is that once the pilots give the concessions, the company will not implement any other changes that will help the airline. The only thing the airline is talking about is pay cuts. They have no other solutions to the problems. Just like at UAL, AA, USAir, etc..., as soon as the pilots make concessions, the airline management will sit back and let the rest of the operation go on cruise control and the red ink will continue to flow. Airline management never follows concessions with any real solutions. They take the concessions, brag to their shareholders that they beat the evil unions, and then sit back and do nothing else. I would give no concessions until I see the other elements of any plan put into place.

DAL would save millions a quarter by parking their gas hogs and putting new, smaller more cost efficient planes on many of their routes. An MD-80 with 90 people on board is a big money loser. An RJ90 with 90 people on board is a big money maker.


I've got news for you: it takes money to buy or lease new airplanes. Delta is so debt-laden right now that it would be extremely difficult to secure financing for a lot of new airplanes.

But, let's assume that Delta could get financing for a bunch of CRJ-900s. Under the current scope, Delta can get as many 90 seaters as they want. They just have to give them to mainline pilots to fly. There is nothing to stop Delta management from getting 90 seat airplanes if they think it is the best airplane for the market. All they have to do is call some of the 1060 off of furlough. I'm sure they would be happy to fly them. How 'bout it TKbane, would you like to fly a CRJ-900 at mainline?

By the way...do you know why DAL management is putting out "all or nothing" deals...BECAUSE THEY HOLD ALL THE CARDS! A smart man knows when he can and can't bluff. DAL pilots have NOTHING to bluff with right now, and DAL management knows this! If I was DAL management, I would like nothing more than to have the pilots sit on their big fats wallets right into bankruptcy. Then I void all my union contracts, put together my own contracts, based on my competitors contracts (remember that contract...10 days off, no trip or duty rig, 50% deadhead pay), and impose my "take it or we'll find someone else to do your job" deal.


Delta still has over $2 billion in cash on hand. At present losses it will take about 2 years to go through that much cash. If Delta management were to file bankruptcy with 2 billion (or 1 billion for that matter) in the bank, then shareholders would file plenty of lawsuits. GG isn't about to risk that just yet. I give it at least a year before that even becomes a remote option.

Even if bankruptcy were to happen, a judge has to approve any contract changes. Management can't just void the contract instantly by filing bankruptcy. ALPA isn't in as week of a position as you make out.

And that Vortilon guy...I and my family carry a DAL pass card in our pockets...just like you and your family. I wear black pants with Gold stripes and my wings say "Delta Connection." You wear black pants with gold stripes and your wings say "Delta." The revenue I generate goes into the DAL bank account, just like the revenue you generate.


Actually, he wears NAVY BLUE pants and gold stripes. If you're going to compare yourself to a Delta pilot at least get the freakin colors right. You are no more a Delta pilot than I am. Get over yourself.

And to top it off...my suggestion was that DAL pilots can come in on top of me with their date of hire at DAL...I just want to get them off the street, because I don't like to see my "team" members suffer.


This is just plain insulting. Guys like TKbane have already been where we are. They've done the regional thing and have moved on to bigger and better things. Do you really think he would give up his Delta number to come back to a regional again? Come on man, get serious. You continue to take what used to be his flying at much lower wages, and now you are going to "let" him come back to ASA? Again, it's just insulting.

PCL-28, TonyC, Vortilon...you guys should go back to the archives and see these same conversations I had with the UAL guys around Dec 2001.


What's your point? The guys at UAL gave huge concessions and liquidation can still be seen on the horizon. What good did it do Trout? They make less money and have a much lower QOL, and the airline still pours red ink. Using UAL as an example does not help your case.
 
PCL-28

First of all...DAL does wear black with gold strips...the whole idea of our uniforms at Delta Connection was to make the customers see a seamles transistion from DAL to DCI when they fly. The only difference in our uniforms is my winds say Delta Connection, and their wings say DAL.

TonyC...you wanted hard numbers for pilot expenses. Since we've all been estimating, here's what an airline analyst says.


from http://www.enquirer.com/editions/2004/04/18/biz_delta18.html

Pressing the case
Company officials and analysts see the pilot situation as the biggest problem.

"Pilot reductions alone won't make Delta profitable, but Delta will not become meaningfully profitable without such pilot reductions," Buttrick said.

Grinstein said in Wednesday's conference call that he has met with more than 1,000 pilots in town hall-style meetings to push his case, although he has yet to make his case to pilots here. The union includes nearly 7,400 pilots, including nearly 800 based in Cincinnati. The company is seeking a 30-plus percent pay cut along with productivity increases.

"Our main competitive disadvantage continues to be our pilot costs," said Grinstein, pointing out that the pilots are due to receive a 4.5 percent raise on May 1. "That continues to be the boulder weighing us down."

The pilots' union has countered with a proposal that calls for a 9 percent wage cut in addition to holding back the impending raises, an offer the union says could help Delta restructure its debt.

Union officials have said that they continue to be open for further negotiations. But they characterize the company's offer as being presented as "take it or leave it," which they say is unacceptable.

"In our analysis, the magnitude of the demand is not justified by the data we have been given," said union spokesman Chris Renkel. "We do acknowledge that our plan addresses the debt, which seems to be the $20 billion elephant no one seems to want to talk about."

Still, "we're just a phone call away." Renkel said.

How long this goes on is up to the pilots, Buttrick said, saying the company could be spending $50 million a month more on pilots than its nearest competitors.

"The sooner the pilots accept the marketplace reality, the smaller the concessions will have to be," he said. "The longer the wait, the deeper they have to be.

"That's just math."

Poison pill possible?
All the swirling problems have led many analysts to begin speculating about Delta's potential for entering bankruptcy. With nearly $2.2 billion in ready cash on hand, Buttrick said the company could survive at least the rest of this year and into next year.

Beyond that, he would say only that "Delta will not be OK after two years," a sentiment echoed by many other analysts in several reports issued this week.

Buttrick and others have openly asked about the potential of spinning off regional subsidiaries Comair and Atlantic Southeast Airlines, which could raise more cash, but Grinstein said the two airlines are "valuable parts of the Delta network."

Grinstein also told analysts he was committed to turning the company around without resorting to bankruptcy.

"I believe we can make Delta a great airline once more, and I believe we can do it without resorting to court-ordered restructuring," he said.

end of article

So there you have it...just as in Dec 2001...my conclusions are backed up by every those folks whose job it is to study the industry.

My points

1. DAL pilot wages are totally out of line with the market.

Analyst says....

"How long this goes on is up to the pilots, Buttrick said, saying the company could be spending $50 million a month more on pilots than its nearest competitors.

"The sooner the pilots accept the marketplace reality, the smaller the concessions will have to be," he said. "The longer the wait, the deeper they have to be."

"That's just math." (gosh I love it when I'm right...especially that part about "the longer they wait, the deeper they'll have to be"...told UAL78 the same thing back in early 2002...that the union should've gone to management immediately after 9/11 and began helping to save the company...of course I was told by the "old head experienced" guys that I didn't understand the industry, and that they need to "preserve the profession.")

2. Pilot wages are a part...but not the whole..solution

Analyst says...

"But the airline's problems don't stop with the pilots. Its credit is tapped out. Fares continue to be depressed, thanks to increased competition from low-cost carriers and price pressures from Internet shoppers."

"Pilot reductions alone won't make Delta profitable, but Delta will not become meaningfully profitable without such pilot reductions," Buttrick said."

Sounds to me like expensive gas hogs need to be parked. and some less expensieve, more profitable aircraft might be needed to make money off the lower fares (DAL just might be able to borrow some money to lease some aircraft if they were able to bring their cost structure down...the reason no banks will loan them anymore cash is they see exactly what I see...there is no way DAL can be competitive in the airline industry without a huge reduction in overhead costs.)

3. DAL has about 18 months left

Analyst says

"Poison pill possible?
All the swirling problems have led many analysts to begin speculating about Delta's potential for entering bankruptcy. With nearly $2.2 billion in ready cash on hand, Buttrick said the company could survive at least the rest of this year and into next year.

Beyond that, he would say only that "Delta will not be OK after two years," a sentiment echoed by many other analysts in several reports issued this week. "

I guessed 18 months...might have been off by a month or two.


You know...it's not that I'm so smart...it's that I read the analysts' predicitons about UAL and US Air in 2001...and they are exactly...almost word for word...the same now in 2004 for DAL.

Again...time will tell who is right...but I fail to see any major differences between UAL/US Air in 2001 and DAL in 2004.

This is the reality at DAL.

1. DAL pilot wages are at least 50% above the industry average.

2. DAL...even with increased capacity and increasing load factors is still losing a billion a year.

3. DAL can no longer borrow money. They have 18-24 months of cash reserves, then they (we) are done.

4. Competition and lower fares wil continue to put more pressure on DAL as AirTran and Jet Blue begin to acquire hundreds more aircraft up and down the NE corridor in direct competition with DAL.

5. DAL needs hundreds of aircraft in the 70-100 seat range...at rates competitive with Jet Blue/AirTran...to have any hope of battling these airlines. Jet Blues 100 new 100 seaters will be serious competition for DAL in NY, as will the 100 new 737s at AirTran in ATL.

6. The longer DAL waits to bring it's cost down , the more debt it incurs, and the less margin and capital it has to make strategic moves...every day is one closer to the "B" word...in which case management will have ALL the leverage...if you don't beleive me, ask my friends at UAL.

UGGHH!!! It's so frustrating...I'm just trying to help my fellow pilots...and their pride and arrogance is just so thick...

I guess that's what I would expect from mostly former AF guys (I being one of them) "we live in fame, go down in flames."
 
goldentrout said:
TonyC...you wanted hard numbers for pilot expenses. Since we've all been estimating, here's what an airline analyst says.


from http://www.enquirer.com/editions/2004/04/18/biz_delta18.html

UGGHH!!! It's so frustrating...I'm just trying to help my fellow pilots...and their pride and arrogance is just so thick...

I guess that's what I would expect from mostly former AF guys (I being one of them) "we live in fame, go down in flames."
Evan, is that you?

Pride ... arrogance... can YOU read???

T O T A L ... O P E R A T I N G ... C O S T S

Did you find those in the article you linked? NOOO. So you still haven't stumbled upon the answer.

If Delta pilots agree to a 30% cut, the savings in TOTAL OPERATING COSTS will be about 2.25%. If they work for FREE, the savings in TOTAL OPERATING COSTS will be about 6.7%.

Will 2.25% savings or 6.7% savings in TOTAL OPERATING COSTS save Delta? NOOOOO.

Nothing arrogant about that, and nothing involving flames.

If it makes you feel better to think you're a quasi-Delta pilot, fine. But don't let it go to your head and make you start thinking you can offer to cut Delta pilot wages while Delta management does nothing to improve the situation. Any wage concessions will only be TOKEN in comparison to the REAL costs of the airline.
 

Latest resources

Back
Top