Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Friendliest aviation Ccmmunity on the web
  • Modern site for PC's, Phones, Tablets - no 3rd party apps required
  • Ask questions, help others, promote aviation
  • Share the passion for aviation
  • Invite everyone to Flightinfo.com and let's have fun

DAL & NWA JPWA Vote

  • Thread starter Thread starter ~~~^~~~
  • Start date Start date
  • Watchers Watchers 18

Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Modern secure site, no 3rd party apps required
  • Invite your friends
  • Share the passion of aviation
  • Friendliest aviation community on the web
peanuckle said:
It pains me seeing the jumbo RJ's running around all the airports that both DAL and NWA have given up in recent years.

superpilot92 said:
I see that also, why is that? Completely short-sighted IMHO. SCOPE is extremely important and needs to be captured asap.

You two weren't singing this tune when you were RJ pilots!

But now that you're ex-RJ pilots, and now mainline drivers, you scream bloody murder about RJ flying and scope.
 
I said the same thing when i was an "RJ" pilot so your attempted flame is worthless. Your embarrassing yourself by acting like a crybaby.:bawling:
 
I'm sure you did. I'm sure you did, indeed!

And the second your regional job would have been threatened by scope, you would have raised bloody he!! like none other. Wrong, i always pushed for CAL to keep the 50 seat scope language. Next :cool:



Hahaha, funny What are you the grammar police:rolleyes: .


Why have you suddenly flooded the NWA and DAL threads spreading you BS? :cool:
 
You two weren't singing this tune when you were RJ pilots!

But now that you're ex-RJ pilots, and now mainline drivers, you scream bloody murder about RJ flying and scope.


Actually, I was singing that tune when I was an RJ pilot. It always ticked me off flying with guys foaming at the mouth over getting 76 seaters. They would always get a lecture on why the larger the airplanes the regionals fly, the fewer top tier jobs there will be.
 
Actually, I was singing that tune when I was an RJ pilot. It always ticked me off flying with guys foaming at the mouth over getting 76 seaters. They would always get a lecture on why the larger the airplanes the regionals fly, the fewer top tier jobs there will be.

Remind me again which pilot group allowed Compass to be formed?

Keep in mind that Mesaba getting 36 new CRJ-900s is simply a replacement for the 69 seat Avros they used to have. So, there is no 'net' change for the "large" RJs at Mesaba.

As far as Pinnacle goes, to this date, they fly only 50 seat CRJs for NWA.

Which brings us to Compass..... explain to me who (which group) 'okayed' Compass to exist and the terms of its existence? Hint... not Pinnacle, not Mesaba.......
 
Last edited:
Economically, the Avro was irrelevant. The CRJ900 is a DC9 slayer.

Compass is an alpa sanctioned alter-ego. That should be NWA/DAL flying.
 
Last edited:
You two weren't singing this tune when you were RJ pilots!

But now that you're ex-RJ pilots, and now mainline drivers, you scream bloody murder about RJ flying and scope.

I don't know Superpilot, but I've known PeanuckleCRJ for several years. His opinions about RJs have always been the same. Just because you fly an RJ doesn't mean you have to agree with the outsourcing bulls---.
 
That should be NWA/DAL flying.

Careful you once were a "RJ" pilot and saying such things will get you a crybaby post from Flamer1015. :bawling:

Alot of us have continually spoken out about not allowing any further outsourcing of flying to the regionals, even when we were at the the regionals, and for whatever reason that just chaps Flamer1015's a$$. Why is that Flamer? :angryfire

I find it ironic that as soon as the new contract got voted on he flooded the NWA/DAL topics with his flames.:cool:
 
Last edited:
I don't know Superpilot, but I've known PeanuckleCRJ for several years. His opinions about RJs have always been the same. Just because you fly an RJ doesn't mean you have to agree with the outsourcing bulls---.

Agreed and I assure you I have always had the same stance. When i was with XJT i was always a proponent of CAL keeping their 50 seat scope limitation even though that meant XJT couldn't at the time get bigger planes. The more flying that is farmed out the less amount of jobs there are at the Majors meaning less positions for everyone, including flyer1015.

The majors should have put it ALL on one ticket to begin with and we wouldn't be having this conversation. Had that been done it would have meant higher career earnings for ALL pilots and quicker longevity rises on the mainline pay-scales. If your not part of solution your part of the problem.
 
The majors should have put it ALL on one ticket to begin with and we wouldn't be having this conversation. Had that been done it would have meant higher career earnings for ALL pilots and quicker longevity rises on the mainline pay-scales.

Ahhhhhhhhhh, finally something I agree with 100%. You can search my previous thread history if you wish to see exactly my point regarding this outsourcing back in the 90s when the RJs first came out.

I like you now.
 
Ahhhhhhhhhh, finally something I agree with 100%. You can search my previous thread history if you wish to see exactly my point regarding this outsourcing back in the 90s when the RJs first came out.

I like you now.

Thats been my stance all along which is why i dont know why you pitched a fit about anything i said previously. Glad we are on the same page now. Carry on ;)
 

Latest resources

Back
Top Bottom