F/O
Smells like....
- Joined
- Mar 7, 2002
- Posts
- 485
Tom
I don't have that much time in the plane, but I know you are coming from the -300 so here are a couple of things you will notice.
First, you will realize how spoiled you were by the room in the Fokker and the Boeing. As others have mentioned, the Lear has an extremely small and I think downright uncomfortable cockpit. My seat sits all the way against the bulkhead and there's still nowhere near the legroom you have in a Boeing. Rudder pedals don't adjust, either.
Second, if it's hot and/or humid outside, the cockpit is a fiery furnace until about an hour after departure, and is especially bad on the ground. I don't think I've ever sweated as much as I did in the Lear on a recent trip back east. Literally soaked in sweat. The A/C works great in the back, though, so as long as you have a GPU the folks will be comfortable on the ground.
A few random observations follow. As you might expect, the Lear is quite a bit more responsive than the Boeing. It's a bit more difficult to fly SMOOTHLY. You will get used to this. You can't deploy the reversers with the nosewheel still off the ground like you can in the 737. Unless you are intentionally using aerodynamic braking to slow, you will lower the nosewheel onto the runway more positively than you do in the 737. Finally, the spoilers are controlled by a switch near the throttle quadrant. This is an "on/off" switch. You get all or nuthin'. Unlike the Boeing, it is impossible to deploy them smoothly. A pitch change and a terrific rumble will follow. You will be manually deploying them on landing. Gear and initial flap extension speeds are the same as the Fokker.
Performance is easy, and no getting spoiled by ACARS and authothrottles!!
Enjoy!!
I don't have that much time in the plane, but I know you are coming from the -300 so here are a couple of things you will notice.
First, you will realize how spoiled you were by the room in the Fokker and the Boeing. As others have mentioned, the Lear has an extremely small and I think downright uncomfortable cockpit. My seat sits all the way against the bulkhead and there's still nowhere near the legroom you have in a Boeing. Rudder pedals don't adjust, either.
Second, if it's hot and/or humid outside, the cockpit is a fiery furnace until about an hour after departure, and is especially bad on the ground. I don't think I've ever sweated as much as I did in the Lear on a recent trip back east. Literally soaked in sweat. The A/C works great in the back, though, so as long as you have a GPU the folks will be comfortable on the ground.
A few random observations follow. As you might expect, the Lear is quite a bit more responsive than the Boeing. It's a bit more difficult to fly SMOOTHLY. You will get used to this. You can't deploy the reversers with the nosewheel still off the ground like you can in the 737. Unless you are intentionally using aerodynamic braking to slow, you will lower the nosewheel onto the runway more positively than you do in the 737. Finally, the spoilers are controlled by a switch near the throttle quadrant. This is an "on/off" switch. You get all or nuthin'. Unlike the Boeing, it is impossible to deploy them smoothly. A pitch change and a terrific rumble will follow. You will be manually deploying them on landing. Gear and initial flap extension speeds are the same as the Fokker.
Performance is easy, and no getting spoiled by ACARS and authothrottles!!
Enjoy!!