JoeMerchant
ASA pilot
- Joined
- Mar 31, 2005
- Posts
- 6,353
CASS and CrewPass don't pay the mortgage.
Hmmm....ability to bypass security or paying my mortgage....Tough question...:laugh:
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
CASS and CrewPass don't pay the mortgage.
What have independent Unions or the teamsters ever done for our profession?
The APA brought us the B scale and a sick out, which along with PATCO put a nasty bile taste for labor amongst the public and gov't....
Telling them they should give up their good schedules, pay, and vacation to start over again isn't going to build a "team".....
Who is saying anything like that? Regional airlines can be a great place to spend a career if you can accept the inherent instability of working for a contract carrier. Considering there really isn't stability anywhere in the industry this isn't much of a trade off.
CASS and CrewPass don't pay the mortgage. There's no food in the cupboard...the pipes are leaking...the foundation is crumbling...and the wiring is shot. But the Window Dressing is looking good.
ALPA, ALPA cheerleaders, and ALPA cheerleader like yourself are saying that..
Saying what? Saying that you should have a crappy schedule? Why would someone want you to have a crappy schedule?
I wish you would come out and say whats bothering you here? What is your perceived hidden agenda?
It's the manner how ALPA has handled it. Live to fight another day?I don't see where ALPA has caused any of this misfortune.
Bingo! And the Majors represented by ALPA brought us the regional jet.The APA brought us the B scale and a sick out
Your point is that regional "lifers" should just accept the fact that their own union is working to limit their careers...and if they don't like it they can leave and go to "big leagues"....That proves that you don't understand the mindset of the regional "lifer".....Until you and the rest of the ALPA cheerleaders understand that....you won't have the Cumbaya moment you are looking for....
I don't have a "hidden agenda" here.....My agenda is to advance MY carrier...and grow it....I will oppose my union if it attempts to limit my carrier.....It is ALPA that has a hidden agenda....It is pretending to represent ALL of us when that is impossible under the current situation.....
Bingo! And the Majors represented by ALPA brought us the regional jet.
It's the manner how ALPA has handled it. Live to fight another day?
And mainline was too good to fly those.Actually, a non-ALPA canadian mainline carrier brought us the Regional Jet.
Willing to forget about the past? You have pilots who have flown for their entire professional career. Many have gone back to 1st year pay MULTIPLE times. Many of these guys have meager retirements saved up partly due to WEAK contracts and countless personal sacrifices made in the name of this "profession."
And you're asking that they just brush the past away to make ANOTHER sacrifice for someone who hasn't contributed anything (300hr GLA SuperPilot) to the industry yet?
Good luck with that.
Of course! Because contracts are permanent and set in stone!
You guys have your heart in the right place...but your head up the wrong place.
Why aren't the pilots participating? One would think if they REALLY believed in the system, then they'd participate, right?
And the AUDACITY of those GA pilots wanting to benefit from all the airway/airport infrastructure ALPA helped usher in...bunch of damned free loaders!!!
I am indifferent to the Skywest pilots.
Look, my comments about ALPA stem from the fact that there is a very obvious disconnect between large carriers and small. Large carriers WILL drive the agenda at ALPA. It will take the wills of many smaller carriers to go ahead and WORK together towards common goals to make them heard. But until you get Chip and Skyler out of the mindset that their job at XYZ Regional airlines is just a "tour of duty" you won't be able to achieve a "minimum" type of contract that should be in place at every regional airline...meaning that certain work rules and certain pay should be a "minimum"...not THE minimum.
But let me ask, assuming I could vote: I'm supposed to elect people that will do these things. And then they don't do these things that I want them to do. I only get to elect a few people at my line pilot level. What's my vote mean beyond those people? Besides, even if the person I get to vote in is trumped by the agenda of the others, who's ultimately responsible? Me and my fellow line pilots or the other people WHO ARE IN CHARGE OF THE NATIONAL UNION?
Scope is probably the biggest example. ABC's scope clause immediately impacts XYZ regional's operations.
***There was a mistake in my previous post, it meant to say 300hr GIA super pilot**This mentality is exactly what I'm talking about. Why should I care about the 300 hour GLA SuperPilot if I can effect change on the magnitude that the 300 hour GLS SuperPilot would be irrelevant.
Like I said, pilots have to abandon the attitude that since I went through hell everyone else must also. That is what I mean by forgetting about the past. The wounds of the past should only be used to motivate people to effect change so that no one else endures those same hardships. And it may also take having to make one more hardship to make that happen. And that is why pilots need to abandon the "whats in it for me right now" attitude as well.
***There was a mistake in my previous post, it meant to say 300hr GIA super pilot**
Pilots have to abandon this attitude? How about pilots have to provide for families and retirements? Like it or not, this attitude WILL NOT change. It doesn't mean I agree with it, but I can certainly appreciate this attitude when:
-Retirements are slashed
-Pilots lose their medical well before 65
-Multiple furloughs
-And concessions
It's not necessarily rooted in "I went through hell, so do they" as much as it is "What's in it for me right now, because tomorrow is promised to nobody?"
The highlighted words are KEY. Because it also works to managements favor. I believe the idea of a strong Union CAN work...but you need solidarity among the pilots (even if only in ONE group) to work. Right now...I don't see that and it doesn't look like many pilots are buying into it now.Exactly why that language can be included on any contract. Once you have the language in place, there is nothing management can do, short of BK, to take it away if the other party is unwilling.
If there is a will, there is a way. It sounds like you are not against anything we are talking about buy just believe that it isn't possible. It is possible. This is a man made problem that can be fixed if enough of us want to fix it. This isn't like trying to defy any laws of physics.
Alot of people are disenfranchised by the government today. Seems like you gotta pay to play...if you don't have the money...get outta the way for the next person who does.I can say the same thing for the US government. Why aren't the citizens participating? ONe would think if they REALLY beleived in the sytem, then they'd participate, right?
I'm all for stomping out pilot pushing. I am not for watching pay and benefits dwindle.The difference is that most GA pilots are not trying to make their living more safe. Most GA pilots can elect not to fly if they feel its too dangerous where as airline pilots had to deal with pilot pushing.
But even if you did earn a living in GA, there are other organizations you could contribute to to make it better such as AOPA, EAA, NAFI, SPA, HAI, NBAA, etc.