K.V.
Well-known member
- Joined
- Mar 14, 2003
- Posts
- 240
So was Sten Molin a buffoon, too?
Yes. But that's apples to oranges clown
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
So was Sten Molin a buffoon, too?
Raise your hand if you've been taught by a Part 121 airline during the stall recovery section of simulator training to not lose altitude at all costs, no matter how long you keep it in the shaker, how much you ride the barber pole, and how close you get to a pusher.
"Don't let the nose drop!"
The thing I can't believe is the media reporting that the NTSB says that icing was not a factor. Are you kidding me? Is the NTSB really saying this? Icing was obviously the BIGGEST factor in this accident. True, it was pilot error in letting the airspeed deteriorate, but if the airplane wasn't covered in ice it would have stalled at a much lower airspeed. Not to mention how distracted the crew was by the whole idea of ice being on the airplane.
No one stalls on PURPOSE! It's when a bunch of factors come into play, attention diverted (maybe a turn from base to final, eyes out, and speed drops while spoilers were out), adding the fact this is leg 6 of 6 and you're pushing a 14+ hr duty day.Like 99% of other pilots out there, I dont stall airplanes, therefore not needing to see if my training department has taught me proper stall recovery.
I'm just not sure what there is to learn from this accident, really.
That the never ending quest to "never compromise savings" is burying this industry and people along with it.
The question is- will any true corrections be made from it?
Everybody here is missing the real point. DONT STALL!!! Its really not that hard. Stall recovery profiles should NEVER be used on the line because you should NEVER unintentionally stall an aircraft...