Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Friendliest aviation Ccmmunity on the web
  • Modern site for PC's, Phones, Tablets - no 3rd party apps required
  • Ask questions, help others, promote aviation
  • Share the passion for aviation
  • Invite everyone to Flightinfo.com and let's have fun

CNN reported...you decide

Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Modern secure site, no 3rd party apps required
  • Invite your friends
  • Share the passion of aviation
  • Friendliest aviation community on the web
Ridding Iraq of Saddam was a good thing. Whether or not we were justified in doing it, I don't know. The proof will be in the pudding.

What I wonder is how those who are gung ho for the war in Iraq and possibly Syria would feel if it was them who had to risk their lives for it? Would they be willing to go to Iraq? Would they be willing to send their son or daughter to die for this cause? Or is it only ok as long as we pay someone else to do it? Most Americans, myself included, would have been willing to go into Afghanistan. How popular would this war be if we had a draft with no excusions? I wonder.
 
The poets always say it best

Jackson Browne
Lives in the Balance (1986)

I've been waiting for something to happen
For a week or a month or a year
With the blood in the ink of the headlines
And the sound of the crowd in my ear
You might ask what it takes to remember
When you know that you've seen it before
Where a government lies to a people
And a country is drifting towards war
And there's a shadow on the faces
Of the men who send the guns
To the wars that are fought in places
Where their business interests runs
On the radio talk show and the TV
You hear one thing again and again
How the USA stands for freedom
And we come to the aid of a friend
But who are the ones that we call our friends--
These governments killing their own?
Or the people who finally can't take anymore
And they pick up a gun or a brick or a stone
There are lives in the balance
There are people under fire
There are children at the cannons
And there is blood on the wire
There's a shadow on the faces
Of the men who fan the flames
Of the wars that are fought in places
Where we can't even say the names
They sell us our president the same way
They sell us our clothes and our cars
They sell us everything from youth to religion
The same time they sell us our wars
I want to know who the men in the shadows are
I want to hear somebody asking them why
They can be counted on to tell us who our
enemies are
But they're never the ones to fight or to die
And there are lives in the balance
There are people under fire
There are children at the cannons
And there is blood on the wire
 
Mar, Amen brother........

We like to wring our hands about how the Arabs hate the Westerners and they want to destroy our way of life It justifies the actions of the puppets(Kennedy, Johnson, Nixon, Ford, Carter, Reagan, Bush, Clinton, Bush that the "men in the shadows" put in place to affect their own agendas.....It is about the purity of absolute power that knows no borders. If you dont think so than do the research....Start with a guy named Abe Lincoln and the economics of the "War of Northern Aggression".... It's really quite simple. In order to have absolute power you must have unlimited capital and that is where the good detective will pick up the trail. Back to the Arabs, they will never be able to affect our quality of life in the same manner that "we" have absolutely ruined theirs. They have spent the last 5 generations with a big fat western thumb squarely in their eye and they are sick and tired of it. We build military bases in their holy lands and prop up puppet regimes all around them so what should we expect at this point. It is time my friends like Hank Jr. says "for everyone to leave everyonelse alone" but it will never happen. And for all you weeping liberals and right wing freaks, it just does not matter who resides at 1600 pennsylvania for they are simple tools placed there for a specific purpose. The puppets nor their masters ever stand in the way of a bullet so I say this, once they put soldiers in harms way than it is right to support 100% those soldiers and demand that we wage war with ferocity so that it may end as soon as possible but in no way does this support the policies that put them in harms way nor the creators of those policies...............and only when it is over should we then demand to know what dire straits could possibly justify the clear abuse of power by those that hold it over those that gave it........... Do you get it now!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
 
Thanks man

Doggman I'm glad you chimed in at this particular moment.

This'll be my last post for awhile.

Keep hand flying for fun.:cool:
 
What I wonder is how those who are gung ho for the war in Iraq and possibly Syria would feel if it was them who had to risk their lives for it? Would they be willing to go to Iraq?

"Quite proud" and "Yes."

Z
 
Re: Thanks man

mar said:
Doggman I'm glad you chimed in at this particular moment.

This'll be my last post for awhile.

Keep hand flying for fun.:cool:


Good. my eyes were starting to blur from all the crap coming off your posts. At any rate a good debate is always fun, even if we will never agree. :confused: ;)
 
I'm so glad that everyone posting here is smarter than the people making the decisions. Gives me a warm fuzzy to be a part of it all.
 
flywithastick said:
surplus1 - Just when has "W" invoked God in any of his doctrines? Obviously he has faith, but your equating him with fanatical Islamics such as OBL, Ayatola Khomenni, et. al. is way, way off. You just make this stuff up as you go?!

Someone, I can't remember whom, once said "Religion is the opiate of the masses." GWB is a self-proclaimed evangelical Christian. I see that as little different from the fanatical Muslims. If the likes of Par Robertson and Jerry Farwell could ever gain political control of the government, I submit it would be little different from what the Ayotollah Komeni did in Iran. Each of these "groups" has apparently decided that his own version of religion is the one that should prevail and each is bent on the destruction of the other. The methodology that they choose may be different, but the objective is the same.

No, I don't invent this stuff or make it up as I go. I just research the bakgrounds and affiliations of the players and read as much as I can. My reading includes what they say about themselves, what they say about others and what others say about them and, most import of all, the record of what they actually do. Then I form my own opinions.

Yes, I watch FOX News for I need to know their "spin" just as much as I need to know the "spin" of the others. My "problem" is that I don't believe what they say.

GWB is "such and affable fellow, ever uttering anodyne platitudes, the only way to get any real sense of him is through his record." Well, forturnately for those who care, he does have a record -- one in business that predates his adventrues in politics as well as one in politics where he was govenor of Texas for two terms, and one of religious affiliations.

In business, Bush has a record. The record of the Texas Rangers baseball team and Bush's ability to parlay his small investment into a multi million dollar fortune. Bush was a small player, but as the son of a sitting president he could lend his name to a project run by the big players. The name lender got the taxpayers of the Great State to add a big chunk of value to his business, became govenor, and made a $15 million dollar profit, on a $600K investment. It makes Hillary Clinton's adventure in commodities futures look like peanuts.

With respect to religion, what GWB actually believes is anybody's guess but his affiliation with and use of the "Christian Right" is no secret. Ostensibly Bush was "brought to Jesus" by the venerable Billy Graham, whose views with respect to Islam surfaced after 9/11. They were so "insensitive" as to require a public "explanation" of what he supposedly meant. The subsequent "clarification" was little more than a political damage control operation. IMO, Mr. Graham meant exactly what he said.

Another prominent figure in the political life of the governor/president and the Republican Party in Texas is Pat Robertson. Some say the whole party was "born again" in FTW back in '98. As former Senator Margaret C. Smith of Maine once said, "The Republican Party has been taken over by the Four Horsemen of Calumny: fear, ignorance, bigotry and smear." IMO she wasn't wrong.

Another well know affiliate of GWB (in Texas) is Fort Worth televangelist James Robison. You can do your own investigation of that nut. I don't know if Farwell also fits into the picture somewhere, but as a leader of the Christian Right, we do know what he thinks about Islam and a whole lot of other things. We also know that he, Robertson and a whole lot of their kind would like nothing better than to gain political control of this country.

Bush's appearances at that famous Southern bastion of bigotry, B. Y., during the campaign was an accident? Did you know that our President professes to belive that Jews can't go to Heaven and that only Christians are granted God's grace? Apparently Mr. Bush shares the views of the Reverend W. A. Criswell of the First Baptist Church of Dallas (who reportedly often speaks on "behalf of the Lord".) Don't know who Criswell is? Do the reasearch.l

I don't have any positive feelings about Islam myself. I think most of them are fanatics and dangerous. I just happen to think that the evangelical Christian Right is no less fanatic or dangerous. Both of these groups constantly invoke the rath of the Allmighty against each other and the rest of the "infidels", i.e., anyone that doesn't believe what they believe. In my opinion, having a president that is apparently a part of either one of them is not in the best interests of this Republic nor of mankind. I believe in secular States. Religion should have no part in government and government should have no part in religion.

While I have my own religious beliefs, they are separate from my politics and I hope that the same will remain true in my country, as intended by its Constitution.

Finally, under the leadership of governor GWB, Texas became the national laboratory for bad government. I sincerely hope that doesn't carry over to these United States. Up to now, I see nothing that would indicate that it hasn't. I won't invoke the Lord to stop it, but neither will I regret the change to escape it in 2004.
 
Mar said--
KSU--"Sovereignty" = Rightful status, independence, or prerogative.

I'm sorry I'll use smaller words for you because you obviously didn't understand. No nation attacked us, but there are nations that supported those that did. i.e. Iraq.

350Driver

How arrogant are you? You come and post generalities and falacies in an attempt to sound enlightened or some how insightful? You stated no facts, just your opinion. Based on what? What CNN told you? I think we can clearly rule out CNN as a reliable news source now. Get a clue.

please continue to give the majority of us laughs...

71% support President Bush's job as a whole. So I guess in your little world 29% makes up the majority?

BTW when I said Syria and Iran are coming around I was refering to Iran adding a vote on whether or not to reinstate diplomatic relations with the US. That happened just this week. And Syria has hinted they will aid the US in finding any fugitives that may have crossed into their country.
 
posted by ksu_aviator...

No nation attacked us, but there are nations that supported those that did. i.e. Iraq

No offense intended BUT if you "attempt" to speak the big talk you should atleast have some factual evidence to back this up. Absolutely nothing you have posted in this thread is backed up by any factual evidence whatsoever, most if not all are your personal beliefs and opinions , nothing more and nothing less. Read exactly what you have written. How exactly DID Iraq support 9-11.?? What evidence do you have to back these comments up.?? Please explain how Iraq posed such a threat to US interests.?? I am sure you will dodge these questions but I will ask once again.......




How arrogant are you?

I am nothing more than a "taxi driver" in the sky that knows his stuff well.:D ... (my weak attempt at sarcasm for the night)




You come and post generalities and falacies in an attempt to sound enlightened or some how insightful?

I think you may have twisted that around just a tad, not overly sure though. I attribute my writings to the fact that I look at what is as clear as day (evidence or there lack of) and I try not to buy into the false propaganda that the "w" administration is trying to sell to many.. I prefer not to drink that same kool aid as others.




You stated no facts, just your opinion. Based on what? What CNN told you? I think we can clearly rule out CNN as a reliable news source now. Get a clue

And what have you proven in your posts.?? Thought so...... I guess we will have to agree to disagree.

71% support President Bush's job as a whole. So I guess in your little world 29% makes up the majority?

I am sure you are well aware of how these "polls" are set up... How many people are included in this poll.?? Are the majority of Americans included in the poll.? I think not.....

Nothing personally, I enjoy a good debate however I would appreciate examples of HOW "I" am so far off and you are so "correct". Is this too much to ask for.?

3 5 0
 
350 - Go get laid. you need it badly.
 
350 - Go get laid. you need it badly.

I believe the Catholic church teaches "good" followers to wait until marriage before engaging in sexual activities. I think the bible says to abstain as well.:D :D

I do like the avatar loaf. !
c h e e r s
3 5 0
 
350DRIVER said:
I believe the Catholic church teaches "good" followers to wait until marriage before engaging in sexual activities. I think the bible says to abstain as well. :D
So I wonder which causes more sexual deviancy...

(1) ...having sex.

(2) ...being told from day one that sex is bad, and normal human desire must be repressed.

Like I told my wife: when you discover a Playboy in your son's room, doing nothing at all generates a lot less trauma than confronting him with it!

But this is not what the thread is about...sorry. :)
 
Like I told my wife: when you discover a Playboy in your son's room, doing nothing at all generates a lot less trauma than confronting him with it!

I will babysit anytime you and your wife need a free night and do as instructed by "you" if you would just walk my resume in.:cool: :D - lol..... this way there will be no trauma for you- I can get over things like that just in the nick of time for indoctrination and systems class. !! !! !!

3 5 0 :D

( no sarcasm intended in this post )- lol
 
350DRIVER said:
I will babysit anytime you and your wife need a free night and do as instructed by "you" if you would just walk my resume in.:cool: :D - lol..... this way there will be no trauma for you- I can get over things like that just in the nick of time for indoctrination and systems class. !! !! !!

3 5 0 :D

( no sarcasm intended in this post )- lol

I'd walk your resume in here, but oops, I forgot we're NEVER HIRING AGAIN since we now have a limitless supply of AA flowbacks.
 
I'd walk your resume in here, but oops, I forgot we're NEVER HIRING AGAIN since we now have a limitless supply of AA flowbacks.

Your PIT to ORD crews have always been extremely kind, went out of there way for me, and I have never heard a negative comment pertaining to the present day problems you are facing, so cheers to you guys for a pretty positive attitude and hopefully the future will be on your side.


3 5 0
 
How exactly DID Iraq support 9-11.??

This is how...

http://www.terrorismanswers.com/sponsors/iraq.html#Q2

Some Iraqi militants trained in Taliban-run Afghanistan helped Ansar al-Islam, an Islamist militia based in a lawless part of northeast Iraq. The camps of Ansar fighters, who clashed repeatedly with anti-Saddam Kurds, were bombed in the early days of Operation Iraqi Freedom. In February 2003, Secretary of State Colin Powell told the U.N. Security Council that Iraq was harboring a terrorist cell led by Abu Musab Zarqawi, a suspected al-Qaeda affiliate and chemical and biological weapons specialist. Powell said al-Zarqawi had both planned the October 2002 assassination of a U.S. diplomat in Jordan and set up a camp in Ansar al-Islam’s territory to train terrorists in the use of chemical weapons. Powell added that senior Iraqi and al-Qaeda leaders had met at least eight times since the early 1990s.



What evidence do you have to back these comments up.??

I posted in my last post links to Syria's comments and the poll numbers, but I'll do it again...

http://www.gallup.com/poll/releases/pr030403.asp




What proof do you have that President Bush is putting forth false propaganda? More likely you refuse to believe President Bush is right because that would mean that President Clinton was wrong to ignore these issues.
 

Latest resources

Back
Top