TWA, If you are indeed an airline refugee (ex TWA) like most of us are I understand your frustration over a system that uses longevity.
I was hired at TWA in April 1999 and furloughed October 2002. My frustration lies more in pilot groups who seek to take advantage of others, ie, the USAirways Easties.
In my opinion your group took it in the shorts when you were bought by AA.
Yes, but do you fully understand why? Though I certainly disagree with the APA-imposed integration methodology I have to concede it's possible an arbitrator could've ruled similarly. Had that integration gone to arbitration I would've accepted the result even if I didn't like it.
What irks me about you isn't your support for a particular integration method but your support for a pilot group that wishes to do exactly what the APA did to TWA. You can express your opinion of Nicolau's list all you like but that doesn't change the fact that both sides submitted to binding arbitration and one side disliking the result doesn't justify their actions.
I personnally don't feel the need to jump longevity nor am I in the mood to have folks jump over me?
Relative seniority. It means maintaining your current seat, equipment, and position. Unless the two pilot groups are demographically similar a DOH/LOS integration causes far more of the leapfrogging you lament.
Again, in my opinion, though AWA may have been a great place to work they still find themselves in a position where they are not bringing much to the table.
Whether this is a great place to work is irrelevant and what we'd bring to the table is our airplanes and our flying. What that's worth should ultimately be up to a neutral to decide.
If we do a relative seniority type of deal, AWA pilots will have gone from a small carrier to looking at widebody oceanic flying overnight,while the USAir pilots will get shoved even further down the list,
That's why there are usually fences. And the USAir pilots were already shoved down the list when close to half their pilots were furloughed.
Although you and some of your fellow AWA pilots would have no problem with this it would only bring anomosity and resent to the over all pilot group.
WHO brings the animosity?
Now as for USAP, they would have to go. It would make more sence to have UAPA, unless it's the USAir name that survives!!??
Which name survives is irrelevant and whichever union loses the representational election will be the one to go. I've been an ALPA member at three carriers, IBT, APA, and now USAPA. A union's strength comes not from its national affiliation but from within. Frankly, I think fixing ALPA from within is the best way to go. Not saying it'd be easy but I see zero advantage to any in-house unions.