rigger
Well-known member
- Joined
- Dec 18, 2004
- Posts
- 387
Curious to know some details.
If you hate unions, that's cool.
But not being from CA, could someone enlighten me as to what the union did, specifically, to cause CA to fail? Did you guys bargain for, and receive, some exhorbitant payscale that wasn't sustainable? Go on strike?
So what happened that the union is taking the blame for these developments at CA?
I'm not asking for a back-and-forth about what the union is doing NOW, for or against the pilots/company. Just want to know what the union did to cause CA to fail.
Thanks to anyone who replies without flaming.
As has been said here already, it is one of many items that pushed the car over the bridge. You and I both know that unions ALWAYS increase costs and reduce margins, there are studies after studies showing the numbers. The zealots will argue this but Hey I just read where bumbles chief budget guy says they gave a balanced budget....there will be bamabots on here telling you it's true....
As was told in the road shows by the president and many others before the vote be careful what you wish for...things can get worse, law of unintended consequences, etc etc. you did not need to be a rocket scientist to read the tea leaves to how rough the business was, so what do the super smart pilots do.....stop any chance of reviving the company economy and create an entire new company division funded by the company to go after themselves.....this is what the union did as soon as it got voted in. Not saying the union was not needed by the things the company was doing but am saying just like adding new taxes there comes a point where people and companies say screw it we are done.....it's the laffer curve....it's real and working.
They voted a union, they got a union, the company actually does sooner what it was thinking about already ( if this happens, or this happens we can do this, or this) it's how business works.....contingency plans.