General Lee said:
Surplus1,
Easy now bud, come on. I was agreeing with you that we needed to work it out. But, in some ways this really is about our bat, our ball, and our stadium because our PWA controls your growth. I know you don't like or agree with that, but it is the truth.
General,
From my perspective this is not a quarrel with you personally, it is only a discussion of the issues. You have some valid points which you believe are predominant. I believe that my points are more valid than yours. Thus we have a disagreement and a debate.
You are correct that your PWA in its present form controls our growth. That is why the legitimacy of our union negotiating those provisions that favor you and prejudice us is in question. I do not question the truth of your statement (above), I question the validity of those contractual provisions, and they are being challenged legally. We will both have to await the outcome of that challenge.
When I said your side of the industry was "crumbling", I meant that the pay side of your industry is going to the lowest bidder---like the new contracts for Skywest and Chataqua---all going for growth. Delta management can see that. They will apply that to you as well.
OK, that I understand and I can't say you're wrong. I can somewhat understand the Chautauqua (new) contract because of where they were before, but the actions of SKYW, ARW and ACA totally escape my reasoning. I think any pilot group that believes it can "buy" future growth by giving up its contract is extremely foolish.
AA, UAL and U all had legitimate reasons for making some concessions given the status of those companies. There may even be reason for the DAL pilots to make some concessions (that's your call). But those "regionals" had, in my opinion, no reason at all to do what they have done. It was a classic case of FUD. The fact that ALPA was complicit in several of those "deals" is also rotten to the core. I can guess why, but this isn't the place for that speculation.
Hopefully the CMR MEC will recognize several things, 1) There can be no more growth at DCI as long as your PWA remains unchanged (therefore promises of growth are a scam), 2) Comiar itself can't agree to "growth" __ Comair does not control that __ so unless Delta itself makes the "deal" it won't be worth the paper its written on; 3) The financial condition of CMR does not justify the need for concessions in its pilots' compensation package; 4) The folly of others should not govern CMR decisions; 5) Our brothers at ASA deserve our support __ undercutting their negotiations is not in our best interest or theirs; 6) The fact that the DL pilots would like us to "share" in their own concessions is irrelevant.
Since I doubt that DAL itself will agree to direct negotiations, and I doubt even more that ALPA would agree to that, the answer to the request for concessions should be: Not until you (Delta) have something realistic to offer in exchange.
We shall see how it all plays out.
I hope your future growth will meet your expectations and hopes and that all your furloughed pilots can be recalled to your own seniority list very soon.
General, I don't expect the DMEC to "rush to our aid". I don't even recall our asking that. You all are way too busy trying to use us as a bargaining chip in your own discussions with the Company. That I wish you would stop, but I don't expect you to do that either. You will not stop until the courts require you to do so. Maybe the courts will and maybe they won't, we'll both have to wait and see.
We have to come to some sort of an agreement that would benefit you guys and our furloughs somehow. (And after this CRM mess--I don't see any of them going to the bottom of any DCI list) I know you probably don't like that, but that is reality.
Meanwhile, I don't see anything even remotely similar to "Jets for Jobs" happening on this property. Perhaps I am misreading you, but it looks like you might be hinting at some form of J4J as a possible solution. Are you?
Maybe Delta will "order" Comair management to hire your furloughed pilots. If that happens it will be fine __ as long as it is in compliance with the CMR PWA. If you believe we have "CRM problems" now, which we do not [propganda from your management], I assure you that any attempt to place Delta pilots on the CMR list ahead of CMR pilots (like J4J) would create a lot more than "CRM problems". This is not Mesa, and I'm pretty sure that CMR pilots will not allow their own seniorty to be bypassed by Delta pilots (or any other pilots) under any foreseable circumstance. You would not do that and neither will we.
We do need a joint solution to the divisive issues, but that one isn't it.
Best regards,