NYRANGERS
Well-known member
- Joined
- Jun 13, 2002
- Posts
- 592
Re: Re: Beautiful Irony
I understand the situation completly, thank you. Up until very recently, the comair mec and rjdc have tried not to step on each other too much. Now it seems the mec (cmr) is distancing itself from the the rjdc. The comair mec is smelling a loser in the rjdc and is now trying to open constructive dialog with our (Delta) MEC.
I don't care for the J4J idea. I would be happy with the opportunity to work for one of our DCI carriers (at the bottom of the seniority list) w/o resigning my number. I know some of you ASA guys and most of the comair guys don't like the idea.
All I am trying to say is.......with regards to the interest of furloughed pilots (of all airlines). We would incourage new aircraft to go to airlines with pilots that are willing to fly with us (us being just like any new hire) and not to a group whose mec does not care for the idea.
If Chautauqua gets all of "your"(cmr, I know you fly for ASA) new growth aircraft.................I don't yet see a problem with that. I would rather see the aircraft go to ASA, but CHA will hire furloughed pilots as well.(with out cmr restrictions).
I am sure there are many furloughed pilots (of all airlines) that welcome the opportunity to fly and support their families doing what they are best at.
NYR
~~~^~~~ said:NY Rangers, you completely misunderstand the issues. The RJDC litigation is the result of ASA and Comair being locked out of bargaining by ALPA. Comair and ASA does not have scope because ALPA would not allow us to negotiate with Delta because of the objections of the Delta MEC.
Now ALPA is finally starting to realize the RJDC is correct on this point. A couple of weeks ago Duane Woerth was in CVG telling Comair pilots that in exchange for concessions the union would require that Delta be a signatory to the scope section of the Comair contract.
You and the others who parrot the ALPA line and add in the more radical political spin need to update your information - because your union is beginning to spin issues a lot like the RJDC.
Hey if ALPA finally comes around to actually lead us into a "brand scope" or "inclusive scope" I don't care who's idea it was. It is not a matter of who is right, but rather, what is right.
~~~^~~~
I understand the situation completly, thank you. Up until very recently, the comair mec and rjdc have tried not to step on each other too much. Now it seems the mec (cmr) is distancing itself from the the rjdc. The comair mec is smelling a loser in the rjdc and is now trying to open constructive dialog with our (Delta) MEC.
I don't care for the J4J idea. I would be happy with the opportunity to work for one of our DCI carriers (at the bottom of the seniority list) w/o resigning my number. I know some of you ASA guys and most of the comair guys don't like the idea.
All I am trying to say is.......with regards to the interest of furloughed pilots (of all airlines). We would incourage new aircraft to go to airlines with pilots that are willing to fly with us (us being just like any new hire) and not to a group whose mec does not care for the idea.
If Chautauqua gets all of "your"(cmr, I know you fly for ASA) new growth aircraft.................I don't yet see a problem with that. I would rather see the aircraft go to ASA, but CHA will hire furloughed pilots as well.(with out cmr restrictions).
I am sure there are many furloughed pilots (of all airlines) that welcome the opportunity to fly and support their families doing what they are best at.
NYR
Last edited: