Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Friendliest aviation Ccmmunity on the web
  • Modern site for PC's, Phones, Tablets - no 3rd party apps required
  • Ask questions, help others, promote aviation
  • Share the passion for aviation
  • Invite everyone to Flightinfo.com and let's have fun

chemtrails

Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Modern secure site, no 3rd party apps required
  • Invite your friends
  • Share the passion of aviation
  • Friendliest aviation community on the web
dash8driver said:


either that or he's just flamebaiting everyone...which is what i'm starting to think because he's evading questions and really... who can be this ignorant and gullible to believe such far fetched stories.


Flamebait, say it ain't so.

Actually, I think that Denver has stumbled on to the secret Luftwaffe plan to resurrect the Third Reich. It's all of those Krauts at El Paso that are out spreading chemicals all over Texas. If you pay attention, they avoid areas like Fredricksburg, Walburg, New Braunfels, and Ennis because they know that fellow Germans live there. The last time I was out over Texas, I think, just maybe, I may have seen a ME262. They said that it was just a replica built at Meachan five years ago, but I don't believe it. It had to be piloted by Goering's clone from Brazil. What are we to do now? I mean, we finally beat back the Commie threat, then we found ourselves threatened by the Muslims, but they could just be a red herring. If you think about it, George W keeps telling us that the Muslims are peaceful, maybe he really knows but is afraid to tell us that Nazi's are the real threat because he wants to avoid panicking the public. Man, this is getting scary. I think that maybe I'd better move to Idaho. Do they get chemtrails there?

enigma

PS destroy this message as soon as you finish reading it.
 
I challenge denver to document his claim that he took the photo
on his website titled "ChemTail" in Austin, TX on a day when ground temperature was 95F and humidity was 15%.
He needs to supply the date and a link to the archived relative humidity data at the National Weather Service. He won't do so, because he just made it all up. He is a fraud, like most chemmies.
I doubt humidity has been that low in Austin, ever.

I'll bet he doesn't really believe he is being sprayed by chemicals at all, as well. Guess how you can tell a 'true believer' from a faker?

answer: The True Believers actually wear, at minimum, a particulate dust mask at all times. All others are pretenders for one reason or another, as shown by their disregard(and obvious lack of consequences) for protecting themselves from putative "toxins".

Not 1 in 1000 people who claim to believe in chemtrails actually does in truth 'believe', the rest are all fakes.

Here are photos of the two dopey women from Houston who administer the messageboard ChemtrailTrackingUSA which regularly features terrorist threats against aircraft. They are seeking new chemcult members outside a health food store.

The caption reads, "As you will see in the following photographs, plenty of visual aids were provided by the trails being laid overhead throughout the morning."

Note the unprotected smiling faces of these two frauds:

http://users.ev1.net/~seektress/fair2.htm

Jay Reynolds
 
Re: Typhoon1244 #2

See, Denver, the difference between you and me is that I'm willing to do a little research when questions like this come up.
Denver130 said:
I would be hard pressed to say from looking at the bottom of that jet, in the photo Chem Tail that the jet is a Continental 767 airliner. It appears gray.
Denver...guess what color Continental paints the bellies of its aircraft. Go ahead, guess.

If you said "gray," you're correct.

So your credibility isn't getting any better.
I've seen military jets on Wings and at air shows and on movies that appear gray...
Well that certainly makes you an expert in my book! "I've seen military jets on Wings..." Give us a freakin' break, Denver.
Also, you use the word "assume." Your guessing.
Yes, but my guess is rooted in observation, fact, and logic. I can't be certain that this is a Continental jet because USAirways also paints the underside of their aircraft gray!

So tell us, Denver, if two major U.S. airlines operate aircraft that are identical to the one depicted, why must we assume that this is a military aircraft? Hmm?
What is factual is this. Austin is arid, dry, and hot with typically clear skys and the locals will tell you point blank that jet contrails are not a part of the scenery. Its so hot and dry in Austin that by the beginning of May the grass has browned out or is dead, the creek beds are dry and the animals are thirsty.
From NOAA
Most of the time, the moderating affects of the Gulf of Mexico limit daytime highs [in Austin]; however, they also add to the discomfort with higher humidity. (Emphasis added.)
You beloved NOAA doesn't seem to be supporting your contention that Austin is "arid, dry, and hot," Denver.
If chemical engineers at ConocoPhillips with no background in the chemtrail issue can call what they see a chemical spill in the air, it might not be a bad idea to step off of your plane, open up your mind and look up at the sky.
Denver, step outside this winter when it's down around forty or thirty and exhale broadly. You're going to see a plume of water vapor and CO2 appear behore your eyes. Is it a chemtrail? Or is it a natural process called "condensation?"

If you had even the vaguest understanding of basic Earth sciences, you'd know that fog, contrails, low clouds, and high clouds are one and the same.

Answer the stupid question: if we can see condensation at ground level at temperatures as high as forty or thirty, why do you believe that aircraft contrails can only form at minus forty? (You still haven't explained the pictures we've shown you of contrails appearing behind aircraft on takeoff and landing.)
A pilot pat answer is not a good enough explanation.
Your right. You'r ignorant conjecture is far superior to a pilot's "pat" answer. :rolleyes:
 
Other favorite topics

You're kidding me. You actually have either a need to embarrass yourself or you're plain ignorant to post on a PILOT bulletin board that you have a leg up on us with identifying aircraft because you saw it on the TV show WINGS! HA!

You remind me of those morons I just got done arguing with (on the same chemtrailcentral.com board) that the Air Force stood down on 9-11 on purpose. One of the items of evidence....that only a handful of the 30-some-odd air force installations on the east coast launched fighters.

Let's see...the conspiracy author listed Bolling AFB (no runway), Hanscom AFB (no runway), Cape Cod AFS (a radar site), McGuire AFB (KC-10 base), Dover AFB (C-5 base) and a host of other non-fighter installations that since they didn't provide F-16s on 9-11, there must have been a stand down! Not to mention that most of those *with* fighters don't sit in an alert posture.

Basically, it's a bunch of guys who get their aviation education from Wings, sitting around making assumptions about US air defense capabilities and procedures. When I tried to explain that if an airplane loses radio contact, it's typically (at least prior to 9/11) assumed they are having electrical problems of some sort, and fighters aren't automatically launched just to go check out a potential NORDO situation. Anyways...back to chemtrails....
 
I've got another question for you, Denver...not that you'll answer it. You seem to be pretty weak in that area.

I don't know much about petrolium engineering, but I know about combustion. I have frequently flown over and driven past refineries and seen tongues of flame shooting into the sky from these facilities. Now since the petrolium industry has made it very obvious that they are intent on destroying all life on Earth (eg. the Exxon Valdez "accident"), I guess I have to conclude that these "flamethrowers" are part of an evil plot to burn off all the oxygen in the atmosphere. All of us "outsiders" will suffocate while you and your cronies survive in underground shelters, waiting for the atmosphere to restore itself so that you can emerge and take over the globe.

Am I right? Is that what those flames are all about?

Or am I jumping to conclusions due to my ignorance of a very specialized field?


(We've got some nerve, dont we? Thinking we know something about aerodynamics and meteorology, just because we're pilots. Well Denver, you asked what we though about this issue. Satisfied?)
 
Last edited:
Typhoon1244 said:

I don't know much about petrolium engineering, but I know about combustion. I have frequently flown over and driven past refineries and seen tongues of flame shooting into the sky from these facilities. Now since the petrolium industry has made it very obvious that they are intent on destroying all life on Earth (eg. the Exxon Valdez "accident"), I guess I have to conclude that these "flamethrowers" are part of an evil plot to burn off all the oxygen in the atmosphere. All of us "outsiders" will suffocate while you and your cronies survive in underground shelters, waiting for the atmosphere to restore itself so that you can emerge and take over the globe.


dern typhoon, now you've screwed us. you've let the cat out of the bag and our fate is sealed. they are going to "liberate" us so the truth of world domination by the petrol refineries wont get out.

wait.. i think i hear the black helos outside my window. no wait, i wouldnt be able to hear them because they are stealth helos...but i know they're out there to get us now that we know! everyone run for your lives, start some websites to alert the public. let the chemkooks know so they can save themselves! before its too late!

bwahahahahahaha.. oh man... must be the chem-exhaust from the illuminati-mobiles spraying my neighborhood.

good nite...dont forget to check for monsters under your bed and in your closet, denver.
 
Denver,
I was biting my tounge, but i will say it now. I think that you are stupid.
 
Denver130

I see that you have chosen not to respond to any of the questions I or many other have posed to you. You are completely unqualified to speak on the subject of meterology.

Go and beleieve what you want. The operative part of this is "GO".

You're a flake. Go away.
 
Austin time lapse

I know your all crabing at me.
Your thinking how can he possibly think a jet contrail might be a chemtrail in disguise.
Its very simple. Average intelligent citizens are seeing trails that don’t fit the definition of jet contrails.

The best way to illustrate this is the new time lapse link at

http://www.geocities.com/houstonchemtrails/Austin3.html

There’s no way according to jet contrail science that those photos represent normal jet contrails unless you deny jet contrail physics or say that jet contrail exceptions are the norm.

1. The climate is too hot and dry
2. The trails are too low
3. Their too big looking from the ground up.
They should be pencil thin
4. Their lasting TOO LONG – If trails in hot and humid
Houston last 30 seconds, how can they be lasting over
an hour and beyond in hot, dry Austin?
 
Typhoon1244 #3

You said...

Denver...guess what color Continental paints the bellies of its aircraft. Go ahead, guess.

If you said "gray," you're correct

--------------------------------------------

To assume that if the jet belly is gray then its a Continental jet is false. You're still guessing. All gray belly jets are not Continental jets.
 
Re: Austin time lapse

Denver130 said:

There’s no way according to jet contrail science that those photos represent normal jet contrails unless you deny jet contrail physics or say that jet contrail exceptions are the norm.

1. The climate is too hot and dry
2. The trails are too low
3. Their too big looking from the ground up.
They should be pencil thin
4. Their lasting TOO LONG – If trails in hot and humid
Houston last 30 seconds, how can they be lasting over
an hour and beyond in hot, dry Austin?


Okay. You guys are right. He's a troll. I took him seriously initially, but this post seals it for me.
 
Austin climate

Heres a few sentences from articles I've read on Austin climate.

Around the San Antonio-Austin region, average temperatures surpass 90 during the summer. Rainfall is also moderate in Central and South Texas. Only four months see precipitation above 3 inches. The relative humidity averages 47 percent.

The area’s low humidity, combined with warm days and cool nights, contributes to the year round comfort of the San Antonio-Austin region. Residents enjoy over 300 sunny days each year.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------

With an average humidity of 47 percent, would that be high enough to say that figure would fit the term "saturated humidity" which science says you need for jet contrails to form?

By the way, 3 inches of rain over a 4 month span is not a lot of rain to talk about.

So what about the comment that there's a lot of jet contrails now in Austin? There is... just look at ....

http://www.geocities.com/houstonchemtrails/Austin3.html

It looks like train tracks in the sky. Wet drippy, dispersing jet contrails that just don't want to go away.

Question...question...question....turn over the stones...
the truth is out there.....
 
must be the chem-exhaust from the illuminati-mobiles spraying my neighborhood.

"illuminati-mobiles" ROFL. dash8driver, that's the funniest thing I've seen on this board in a long time.


Denver130,

It's hard to believe that you take yourself seriously. Your whacko theories would have high school science students laughing at you.
 

Latest resources

Back
Top Bottom