BoilerUP
Citation style...
- Joined
- Nov 11, 2003
- Posts
- 5,311
You paid $70K (which seems awfully high, does that include a college degree?) for your ratings so you could be employed. The distinction comes when you drop an extra 8-12K TO GET A JOB. Many "regionals" airlines in the mid-90s were PFT, including Comair, Expressjet, ASA, and Chautauqua. "Hired" employees had to pay for their training up front before they could start flying for pay.
Many wholly-owned regional airline pilots (ExpressJet, Comair, ASA, American Eagle, etc) on this board bash Mesa and CHQ and occasionally TSA because their contracts aren't a few precentage points above Comair's. They bash Skywest because they are non-union and *currently* fly 70 seat jets for 50 seat rates, although this will change. They claim these companies have "sold out for growth", i.e. accepted lower pay (especially on FO scales) because they are growing rapidly and people are upgrading quickly, often at the expense of the wholly-owned carriers.
The contract carriers (CHQ, SKW, Mesa, etc) often complain that many of the wholly-owned (WO) pilots "bought their job" through PFT (although it was common in the mid-90s) and that they whine about other people's contracts when they are unwilling to take the burden themselves to "raise the bar".
Who is right and who is wrong in this argument? Nobody and everybody. And the whipsaw goes on and on and on...did I miss anything?
I HIGHLY suggest you read both Hard Landing and Flying the Line Vol. 2 before you start your airline career. Best of luck to ya, and welcome to the board.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/1c4fb/1c4fb4a004ac374ae735c210f8560be0dce354ac" alt="Big grin :D :D"
Many wholly-owned regional airline pilots (ExpressJet, Comair, ASA, American Eagle, etc) on this board bash Mesa and CHQ and occasionally TSA because their contracts aren't a few precentage points above Comair's. They bash Skywest because they are non-union and *currently* fly 70 seat jets for 50 seat rates, although this will change. They claim these companies have "sold out for growth", i.e. accepted lower pay (especially on FO scales) because they are growing rapidly and people are upgrading quickly, often at the expense of the wholly-owned carriers.
The contract carriers (CHQ, SKW, Mesa, etc) often complain that many of the wholly-owned (WO) pilots "bought their job" through PFT (although it was common in the mid-90s) and that they whine about other people's contracts when they are unwilling to take the burden themselves to "raise the bar".
Who is right and who is wrong in this argument? Nobody and everybody. And the whipsaw goes on and on and on...did I miss anything?
I HIGHLY suggest you read both Hard Landing and Flying the Line Vol. 2 before you start your airline career. Best of luck to ya, and welcome to the board.