I will kick you in the...
- Apr 8, 2004
- Total Time
Rumor on the streets is that Cape is going to get 70 seat flying in IAH soon?
I don't think any new props are allowed to fly in to EWR anymore. I only see one corporate 328 in there.NEDude said:Every Continental Connection affiliate is rumored to be getting large cabin class turboprops. CommutAir is rumored to be looking at the Q400. Cape Air the Q-400 or ATR. Colgan the Saab 2000. CAL is probably waiting to see who gets them first to shell out a bunch of new flying, both in IAH and EWR.
I have heard multiple variations on the same theme. Some versions say no 19 seaters. Some say no new turboprop flying at all. Some say there is a phase out time frame for all turboprop operations.I don't think any new props are allowed to fly in to EWR anymore. I only see one corporate 328 in there.
So which is going to have a worse impact on EWR: A 78-seat turboprop that can move fast until close-in, or a 37-seat jet that has to slow down farther out?nimtz said:Gee, just what EWR needs! More small fricking airplanes...
Check the joy of the delay programs this summer especially if you are low on the Continental slot food chain. The answer is neither...CA1900 said:So which is going to have a worse impact on EWR: A 78-seat turboprop that can move fast until close-in, or a 37-seat jet that has to slow down farther out?
Actually, the have ATRs fly as Continental Connection...not Express.TheGreatChecko said:Are you talking about the ATR-42s they fly in Guam?
They apparently have three flying as Continental Express.
CLECA,CLE145CA said:Actually, the have ATRs fly as Continental Connection...not Express.
The only airline currently authorized to use the "Express" name is ExpressJet.
Source? Not likely. TP are not allowed into EWR any more and I doubt CAL would be interested in more delays in and out of EWR/IAH for equipment that can occupy jet space. Sabbs or ATR's for Commutair out of CLE would not be out of the realm of possibility.NEDude said:I have heard multiple variations on the same theme. Some versions say no 19 seaters. Some say no new turboprop flying at all. Some say there is a phase out time frame for all turboprop operations.
However CAL is talking about large turboprops with its connection partners, and EWR is widely talked about in those discussions. So that would lead one to believe that there is some room for props in EWR.
Express has stated in the past that CAL has approached them to do TP flying, but XJT said they could not do it any more and be profitable. We will see if that rings true once oil hits $70.00 a barrel.Why wouldn't CO look at giving props to XJT, and just to CO Connection carriers? I know XJT used to have props, what's to preclude them from having them again? (I know you guys wouldn't be too thrilled, just curious.)
BLUE-ICE-MAN said:I've heard that the flying would be out of IAD. This would be in addition to the GUM flying currently in place.
Maybe a light Q400 vs. a heavy CRJ. The plane does well down low, but it is still a prop. I think once the rj get some airspeed on it above 10k it does better than the megawhacker.Headfake14 said:I heard the Q400 will out climb the CRJ (VSI) up through the low teens...thats what I've heard, don't know for sure..
This isn't true at all. XJT simply has no interest in operating props.Mookie said:When they IPO'd part of the deal was that they would not operate turboprop planes again....ergo...no props on property or it's an SEC violation.