It potentially puts Delta pilots in position to take the DC9 furloughs, if that happens.
You mean the we over expanded in Europe furloughs.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
It potentially puts Delta pilots in position to take the DC9 furloughs, if that happens.
DAL737FO;1718812When it boils down to it for SLI purposes 911 has nothing to do with it. A number is a number. We have hired 10% of our seniority list since 911. You are using an emotional issue said:Actually I believe the arbitrators said something to the effect that all career expectations were off post 9/11, therefore those hired after 9/11 do not have the same expectations as those in the game before hand.
Regardless of how the list is constructed, I think it doubtful the arbitrators will agree to put 2007 DAL hires ahead of 1998 NWA hires, just because of the equipment they are on.
No bump/flush together with dynamic or freezes keeps everyone where they are, so there is no aircraft position windfall and minimizes training costs and waterfalls.
Treating different portions of the list differently allows them to reconcile the asymmetries in seniority that occur at one end or the other in other scenarios.
Thus far, the re-deployment of those airplanes on longer routes means that staffing will remain static. On block hour basis, the change should be neutral. Delta's current Advance Entitlement has ~220 new 767 ER positions reflecting this re-allocation.Clippyyip said:You mean the we over expanded in Europe furloughs.
Perhaps.... Nobody wants to take anything from someone who survived the pain of furlough, but, the result is still one heck of a windfallNo bump/flush together with dynamic or freezes keeps everyone where they are, so there is no aircraft position windfall and minimizes training costs and waterfalls.
Treating different portions of the list differently allows them to reconcile the asymmetries in seniority that occur at one end or the other in other scenarios.
But that would go against Einstein's argument. I love how he's talking about a 7 to 5 ratio now with pullouts. Wouldn't this be less than what DAL asked for, which is the only "fair and rational" way to do an award.
Let the backpeddling begin.
You mean the we over expanded in Europe furloughs.
General: Once they can bid Delta bases, we'll be crash pad buddies. Maybe they can tell us where the ones with good high speed internet connections and community beer are. I've never owned a rebel flag, but maybe a little reminder of the Confederacy would help us find the crash pad from the bus stop in the snow.
:beer:
But how can that be. DALPA OBVIOUSLY won every argument and the NWA case is sooooooo weak? What about all the growth opportunities for the NWA guys. Oh, that's right, DAL will be REDUCING capacity. (Damn, can't believe the NWA guys didn't fall for that)
All ribing aside, I would be prepared for a bit more than 1-2%. My $ is ratio top part, DOH middle, hybrid bottom, General Lee fired.
Unless the Company breaks the flow down,