I got the impression flybige was referring more to the issue of whether an interviewer was familiar enough with the legal fine points of logging instrument time rather than disagreeing with the regs themselves.
I agree with him that I wouldn't want to bet my shot at a career slot on whether some interviewer (pilot or non-pilot) understood the regs well enough to know I wasn't "fudging" or, if he did know the regs, pushing the envelope. Considering how flaky and subjective the interview process can be, I wouldn't want to risk it.