Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Friendliest aviation Ccmmunity on the web
  • Modern site for PC's, Phones, Tablets - no 3rd party apps required
  • Ask questions, help others, promote aviation
  • Share the passion for aviation
  • Invite everyone to Flightinfo.com and let's have fun

C-17 lands at wrong airport.

Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Modern secure site, no 3rd party apps required
  • Invite your friends
  • Share the passion of aviation
  • Friendliest aviation community on the web
I can see their confusion. 3500' vs. 11000'
 
The Capt aircraft commander will promptly be promoted to Maj and named Chief of Stan Eval next month!! More to follow!!

Screw up. move up!!!
 
I just read that there 19 crew members on this airplane!

I thought the C-17 just needed two pilots and a loadmaster.

I had the happiness of being an observer on the flight deck of a special purpose C-130 a few times, years ago. I vividly recall that they were carrying extra crewmembers who's main function seemed to be to talk contentiously throughout the flight.

I wonder if there were 23 people yaking away during their approach.

In any case, I hope the pilots have a strong sponsors, they will need them.
 
I was in DFW (taxiing to 17R) when an Air Force 737 landed there but was supposed to be at JRB Fort Worth. The comments from the peanut gallery on ground freq were pretty funny.
 
I'll have to forward this to an old neighbor of mine. He's in his mid-nineties, and still sharp. He once told me about his initial training in the B-17, during which he mistakenly touched down on the same Davis Is. runway at night, only to quickly realize his mistake. He was able to get back airborne and complete the quick trip across Tampa Bay and landed at MacDill. It was the early to mid forties, and his excursion went either unnoticed or was ignored, so he and his crew finished training and he survived dozens of missions over Germany.

Amazing video... I wonder if they've had the seat cushions replaced yet.
 
Was no mistake, this is all running together now from this administration. Remember the military doing exercises in the streets of St.louis and other towns across America. This no doubt is part of the strategy to try getting military into small town America and getting us used to seeing it.
 
The windscreens were probably fogged over, just like the F-16 incident at KOSH last year;)
 
I almost did this a few months ago! I bid off on it initially because we were held up high, and I was in a hurry to get down. Luckily something didn't seem right and I cross checked the glass and saw that this runway was a few miles short of MacDill, but on the same heading. I could see how this could happen if a crew were task saturated and TIRED from the abuse TACC puts crews through nowadays. 24+ hour duty days are the norm, with sliding take off times. Thank goodness for the 12 huge anti skid breaks.
 
I think if you fly long enough you can see how this could happen.
Not proud to admit I have been close once. At least they landed on a runway and not a taxiway.
 
I just read that there 19 crew members on this airplane!

I thought the C-17 just needed two pilots and a loadmaster.

.

True statement, although rarely functional. Most trips are augmented missions, hence three pilots and two loads are the norm.

As to why 19 "crewmembers" the answer could be Dead headers, Areovac Crews or any other host of iterations of the above.

Lucy, you got some expaining to do :).... Always follow the magenta line. When they inputted the airport data for landing, if they put in the wrong airport, the runway length would have been a big tell, just glad there safe.

Cheers

Koko
 
I was in DFW (taxiing to 17R) when an Air Force 737 landed there but was supposed to be at JRB Fort Worth. The comments from the peanut gallery on ground freq were pretty funny.

No f r e a k i n way. I flew out of both, JRB is like 13000 x 300, looks nothing like DFW.
 

Latest resources

Back
Top