spinproof
Well-known member
- Joined
- Oct 19, 2002
- Posts
- 774
Well there you go an expert on (Kool-aid) sucking speaks!!!Apparently not as good as that kool-aid laced breast milk you were sucking from Dan Ford's tit.
Last edited:
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Well there you go an expert on (Kool-aid) sucking speaks!!!Apparently not as good as that kool-aid laced breast milk you were sucking from Dan Ford's tit.
I know you're being funny, but DL operates more rj's than anyone, and like oys said, I think you'll see a lot more of them grounded as they just don't make money (50 seaters) any more.
We will continue to hire. 47 newbies plus 4 rehires on Monday and at least 70 a month in April.
It really doesn't matter how much they lose. They can always go back to BK and hang out a while, not pay creditors, and redo all the contracts that they redid a couple of years ago. It's a pretty good deal. As long as DAL doesn't owe you money, you work for DAL, or own DAL stock.
So the answer to your second question...it doesn't really matter when the money runs out.
My question is, how many years of record profits would it take for DAL to pay off all they lost since 2000.
Update yourself.
JoeMerchant;1538921 If you replace 3 or 4 RJs a day with one Maddog said:Losing traffice due to schedule reduction will not be nearly as much of a factor as has been in past. Why? Because every carrier will be cutting RJ service. The playing field should level itself as the loss-makers are filtered out.
That said, SW is always a problem since they are hedged, even out to 2012 at better than 50% lower fuel costs than the rest of the industry.