Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Friendliest aviation Ccmmunity on the web
  • Modern site for PC's, Phones, Tablets - no 3rd party apps required
  • Ask questions, help others, promote aviation
  • Share the passion for aviation
  • Invite everyone to Flightinfo.com and let's have fun

Best Entry Level Medium

Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Modern secure site, no 3rd party apps required
  • Invite your friends
  • Share the passion of aviation
  • Friendliest aviation community on the web
The WSCoD, although certainly a fine aircraft,
icon6.gif
(snicker, snicker) would most likely suffer from the same runway-itis that the 650, 700, and 55 do at elevation. Even with those fancy limb-cutter looking things glued to the wing.
 
Falcons are out there for little more money. How is the support? Don't know much about their hot and high. Any one operating got an opinion?
 
CelticCitation said:
Falcons are out there for little more money. How is the support? Don't know much about their hot and high. Any one operating got an opinion?

Superb support. We had a slow leak leak on a main tire fuse plug while in Europe. Dassault had a full wheel on a rim sent to us in 1 day .... under warranty to boot (suprising). They also had contracted a local flight department to give us a hand.

I do not think that they will provide the same level of support to the 20 fleet, however. If the 20's are like any other older airframe out there, every time you take it to the service center you will roll the dice on costs. Best to get one that is service center maintained, if there is such an animal, and keep it there. Non represented FBO's can turn your airplane into a maintenance nightmare with little chance of help from the manufacturer.

High and hot is great in the 50/900 and very good in the 2000EX. It starts to deterorate from there. I have never flown the 20 series so I cannot speak on them.
 
G100driver said:
I have never flown the 20 series so I cannot speak on them.

I have dealt with the 20's and they are fine flying aircraft. However, you do not want anything earlier than a F model and you want the 731 conversation. The CF700's are becoming maintenance nightmares. They are based on the CJ610's and GE doesn't support either engine to any great degree. Overhauls are becoming outragous. Plus the fuel burns. It is either pay me now or pay me later. The way the price of fuel is becoming, the pay off of getting fuel effient engines is becoming much shorter.

And forget about 200's. They are orphans. They actually have a lower market value than the 20F's with the 731 conversation, which is an older aircraft. That tells you something.
 
Any concerns on the Sabre 65 with pax thinking they are too old an aircraft? Currently flying a 1980 model C-550, so about the same era, but perceptions mean a lot.
 
CelticCitation said:
Any concerns on the Sabre 65 with pax thinking they are too old an aircraft? Currently flying a 1980 model C-550, so about the same era, but perceptions mean a lot.

Looked at Sabres in the past. If you are carrying women any appreciable amount, the answer is not just NO, but H-LL NO!. Women just seem to hate that step down into the cabin, especially if they are wearing dresses or skirts. Not a major deal killer in the bigger picture, but if a woman has any power over your department, I would give more consideration to something else.
 
Rick1128 said:
Looked at Sabres in the past. If you are carrying women any appreciable amount, the answer is not just NO, but H-LL NO!. Women just seem to hate that step down into the cabin, especially if they are wearing dresses or skirts. Not a major deal killer in the bigger picture, but if a woman has any power over your department, I would give more consideration to something else.
But just think of the comfort that they'll have in knowing that when you ditch in the Atlantic the airplane will float. :p

'Sled
 
Just read on another thread that VII's are going to drop in the market as Net Jets dumps them. Anyone know time frame or how many they actually are getting rid of?
 
You know, you really can't have it all. If you want something with a 1) decent size cabin, 2) good hot and high performance, 3) reasonable cruise performance, 4) fairly new, and 5) a cheap purchase price, it's just not gonna happen. You have to give up something.

You'll be lucky to get three of those five in one airplane. Of course, if you are willing to give up on #5 then you can get a Falcon 50 or a Citation Sovereign and have the other 4.

CelticCitation said:
Any concerns on the Sabre 65 with pax thinking they are too old an aircraft? Currently flying a 1980 model C-550, so about the same era, but perceptions mean a lot.
 
A typical passenger can't tell the difference between a 1978 Citation and a new Encore off the assembly line. Question is, what do they think of the Sabre. I realize there must be compromises. That is why I ask this forum. The opinions of pilots who are flying the equipment means a lot more to me than the opinion of even the most honest salesperson. And I do thank everyone who has given an honest responce.
 
We flew a VII for a couple of years. Very reliable, good performer, nice handling. Sold it and flew a III for 6 months. Really missed the VII. Flying a Sovereign now and what a performer! Does everything Cessna said it would do and more.
 
What kind of range does the Sabre have? And isn't a VII just as much as an Astra and maintaince heavy?
 
Last edited:
The Sabre 65 has 2700 mile range. We have women on board and the step has not been a problem. You step up to the top step - then step down into the aircraft. I do not work for a woman, and what kind of man would let a woman complain about such petty things an the door to his corporate jet? The entry is not as nice as a Hawker, but the 65 is faster, less maintenance cost, and we don't have to put alcohol in our wings.
As far as the age - some passengers think it's a new aircraft and I don't tell them the year model unless they ask. Do they ask the age of the 727 or 737-100 when flying airlines?
If you want or need something newer then the Astra will do about everything a 65 will do and the Falcon 50 will do more, both at a higher cost.

HEADWIND
 

Latest resources

Back
Top Bottom