Lear70
JAFFO
- Joined
- Oct 17, 2003
- Posts
- 7,487
This came up recently amongst the P2P group and we were told that the Midwest group had made a comment that "they *COULD* raise a lot of cash with" those specific dollar amounts, NOT that they HAD done it or were absolutely going to.
Again, there are NO plans to do this at AirTran, just *TALK*. Maybe the guy who was there was feeling out the pilot group to see how that kind of assessment would go over.
I personally think it's a rather stupid move unless and until we are definitely in that kind of battle.
Not that I think a "battle" would be a good thing between two pilot groups, but I've already said I honestly believe no middle ground would be achievable on seniority integration and that it would end up in arbitration a la' UAir/AmerWest.
I'm not saying anything on the recall issue... Although I haven't agreed with much that AP has done in the last 90 days, it's always easier to sling mud than come up with honest fixes to issues and you can't please everyone all the time.
I said it during the election - show me a candidate who's a better choice and I'll vote for them.
Again, there are NO plans to do this at AirTran, just *TALK*. Maybe the guy who was there was feeling out the pilot group to see how that kind of assessment would go over.
I personally think it's a rather stupid move unless and until we are definitely in that kind of battle.
Not that I think a "battle" would be a good thing between two pilot groups, but I've already said I honestly believe no middle ground would be achievable on seniority integration and that it would end up in arbitration a la' UAir/AmerWest.
I'm not saying anything on the recall issue... Although I haven't agreed with much that AP has done in the last 90 days, it's always easier to sling mud than come up with honest fixes to issues and you can't please everyone all the time.
I said it during the election - show me a candidate who's a better choice and I'll vote for them.